All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [Next] CPU Hotplug test failures on powerpc
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:17:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B279370.5050800@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260873827.4165.362.camel@twins>

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> I added some debug statements within the above code. 
>> This is a 2 cpu machine.
>>
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1
>>
>> Seems to me that the control is stuck in an infinite loop and hence the
>> machine appears to be in hung state. The dest_cpu value is always 1024
>> and never changes, which result in an infinite loop.
>>
>> In working scenario the o/p is something on the following lines
>>
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 0 
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 0 
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 0 
>>
>> Let me know if i should try to record any specific value ?
>>     
>
> Could you possibly print the two masks themselves? cpumask_scnprintf()
> and friend come in handy for this.
>
> The dest_cpu=1024 thing seem to suggest the intersection between
> p->cpus_allowed and cpu_active_mask is empty for some reason, even
> though we forcefully reset p->cpus_allowed to the full set using
> cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked().
>   
So here is the data related to the two masks.

cpu_active_mask = 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000
XMON dest_cpu = 1024

while p->cpus_allowed =  00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000001
XMON dest_cpu = 1024

In working scenario the above data looks like

cpu_active_mask = 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000002
XMON dest_cpu = 1

while p->cpus_allowed =  00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000002
XMON dest_cpu = 1


hope i got the data correct.

Thanks
-Sachin


-- 

---------------------------------
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
---------------------------------

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Next] CPU Hotplug test failures on powerpc
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:17:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B279370.5050800@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260873827.4165.362.camel@twins>

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> I added some debug statements within the above code. 
>> This is a 2 cpu machine.
>>
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1
>>
>> Seems to me that the control is stuck in an infinite loop and hence the
>> machine appears to be in hung state. The dest_cpu value is always 1024
>> and never changes, which result in an infinite loop.
>>
>> In working scenario the o/p is something on the following lines
>>
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 0 
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 0 
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 0 
>>
>> Let me know if i should try to record any specific value ?
>>     
>
> Could you possibly print the two masks themselves? cpumask_scnprintf()
> and friend come in handy for this.
>
> The dest_cpu=1024 thing seem to suggest the intersection between
> p->cpus_allowed and cpu_active_mask is empty for some reason, even
> though we forcefully reset p->cpus_allowed to the full set using
> cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked().
>   
So here is the data related to the two masks.

cpu_active_mask = 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000
XMON dest_cpu = 1024

while p->cpus_allowed =  00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000001
XMON dest_cpu = 1024

In working scenario the above data looks like

cpu_active_mask = 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000002
XMON dest_cpu = 1

while p->cpus_allowed =  00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000002
XMON dest_cpu = 1


hope i got the data correct.

Thanks
-Sachin


-- 

---------------------------------
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
---------------------------------


  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-15 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-11 10:53 [Next] CPU Hotplug test failures on powerpc Sachin Sant
2009-12-11 10:53 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-14  2:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-14  2:48   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-14  4:37   ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-14  4:37     ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-14 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-14 10:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-14 11:11   ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-14 11:11     ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-14 11:11     ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-14 12:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-14 12:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-14 21:17       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-14 21:17         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-15  9:44         ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-15  9:44           ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-15 10:43           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-15 10:43             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-15 13:47             ` Sachin Sant [this message]
2009-12-15 13:47               ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-15 15:03               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-15 15:03                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16  5:38                 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-16  5:38                   ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-16  7:14                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16  7:14                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16  6:56               ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16  6:56                 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16  6:25 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16  6:25   ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16  6:41   ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-16  6:41     ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-16  6:45     ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16  6:45       ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16  6:54       ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-16  6:54         ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-16  7:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16  7:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16  7:57           ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16  7:57             ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16  8:24             ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-16  8:24               ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-16  9:07               ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16  9:07                 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16  9:07                 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16  9:15               ` [PATCH] fix cpu hotplug " Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16 10:16                 ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B279370.5050800@in.ibm.com \
    --to=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.