All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ocfs2:freeze-thaw: initialization and cleanup
@ 2010-01-09 18:00 Wengang Wang
  2010-01-15  1:53 ` Sunil Mushran
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2010-01-09 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ocfs2-devel

this patch does some initialization and cleanup for freeze/thaw.

Authored-by: Tiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com>
Authored-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
---
 fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h  |    1 +
 fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c     |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/ocfs2/super.c       |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h
index b5786a7..489c599 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h
@@ -217,4 +217,5 @@ void dlm_register_eviction_cb(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
 			      struct dlm_eviction_cb *cb);
 void dlm_unregister_eviction_cb(struct dlm_eviction_cb *cb);
 
+int dlm_freeze_lock_supported(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm);
 #endif /* DLMAPI_H */
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
index 437698e..ad15a66 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
@@ -764,3 +764,15 @@ error:
 	return status;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dlmlock);
+
+int dlm_freeze_lock_supported(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm)
+{
+	if (dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_major == 1)
+		return (dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor >= 1);
+
+	if (dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_major > 1)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dlm_freeze_lock_supported);
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
index 0caa69e..cf88af2 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
@@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ static int ocfs2_check_refcount_downconvert(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
 					    int new_level);
 static int ocfs2_refcount_convert_worker(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
 					 int blocking);
+static int ocfs2_check_freeze_downconvert(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
+					  int new_level);
 
 #define mlog_meta_lvb(__level, __lockres) ocfs2_dump_meta_lvb_info(__level, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __LINE__, __lockres)
 
@@ -290,6 +292,11 @@ static struct ocfs2_lock_res_ops ocfs2_refcount_block_lops = {
 	.flags		= 0,
 };
 
+static struct ocfs2_lock_res_ops ocfs2_freeze_lops = {
+	.check_downconvert = ocfs2_check_freeze_downconvert,
+	.flags		= 0,
+};
+
 static inline int ocfs2_is_inode_lock(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres)
 {
 	return lockres->l_type == OCFS2_LOCK_TYPE_META ||
@@ -722,6 +729,15 @@ void ocfs2_refcount_lock_res_init(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
 				   &ocfs2_refcount_block_lops, osb);
 }
 
+static void ocfs2_freeze_lock_res_init(struct ocfs2_lock_res *res,
+				       struct ocfs2_super *osb)
+{
+	ocfs2_lock_res_init_once(res);
+	ocfs2_build_lock_name(OCFS2_LOCK_TYPE_FREEZE, 0, 0, res->l_name);
+	ocfs2_lock_res_init_common(osb, res, OCFS2_LOCK_TYPE_FREEZE,
+				   &ocfs2_freeze_lops, osb);
+}
+
 void ocfs2_lock_res_free(struct ocfs2_lock_res *res)
 {
 	mlog_entry_void();
@@ -3006,6 +3022,7 @@ local:
 	ocfs2_rename_lock_res_init(&osb->osb_rename_lockres, osb);
 	ocfs2_nfs_sync_lock_res_init(&osb->osb_nfs_sync_lockres, osb);
 	ocfs2_orphan_scan_lock_res_init(&osb->osb_orphan_scan.os_lockres, osb);
+	ocfs2_freeze_lock_res_init(&osb->osb_freeze_lockres, osb);
 
 	osb->cconn = conn;
 
@@ -3043,6 +3060,7 @@ void ocfs2_dlm_shutdown(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
 	ocfs2_lock_res_free(&osb->osb_rename_lockres);
 	ocfs2_lock_res_free(&osb->osb_nfs_sync_lockres);
 	ocfs2_lock_res_free(&osb->osb_orphan_scan.os_lockres);
+	ocfs2_lock_res_free(&osb->osb_freeze_lockres);
 
 	ocfs2_cluster_disconnect(osb->cconn, hangup_pending);
 	osb->cconn = NULL;
@@ -3228,6 +3246,7 @@ static void ocfs2_drop_osb_locks(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
 	ocfs2_simple_drop_lockres(osb, &osb->osb_rename_lockres);
 	ocfs2_simple_drop_lockres(osb, &osb->osb_nfs_sync_lockres);
 	ocfs2_simple_drop_lockres(osb, &osb->osb_orphan_scan.os_lockres);
+	ocfs2_simple_drop_lockres(osb, &osb->osb_freeze_lockres);
 }
 
 int ocfs2_drop_inode_locks(struct inode *inode)
@@ -3909,6 +3928,11 @@ void ocfs2_set_locking_protocol(void)
 	ocfs2_stack_glue_set_locking_protocol(&lproto);
 }
 
+static int ocfs2_check_freeze_downconvert(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
+					  int new_level)
+{
+	return 1; //change me
+}
 
 static void ocfs2_process_blocked_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
 				       struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/super.c b/fs/ocfs2/super.c
index 14f47d2..9127760 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/super.c
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ static void ocfs2_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode);
 static int ocfs2_susp_quotas(struct ocfs2_super *osb, int unsuspend);
 static int ocfs2_enable_quotas(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
 static void ocfs2_disable_quotas(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
+static int ocfs2_freeze_lock_supported(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
 
 static const struct super_operations ocfs2_sops = {
 	.statfs		= ocfs2_statfs,
@@ -1772,10 +1773,18 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super_block *sb,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int ocfs2_freeze_lock_supported(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
+{
+	if (!osb->cconn || !osb->cconn->cc_lockspace)
+		return 0;
+	return dlm_freeze_lock_supported(osb->cconn->cc_lockspace);
+}
+
 static int ocfs2_mount_volume(struct super_block *sb)
 {
 	int status = 0;
 	int unlock_super = 0;
+	int unlock_freeze = 0;
 	struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(sb);
 
 	mlog_entry_void();
@@ -1796,6 +1805,15 @@ static int ocfs2_mount_volume(struct super_block *sb)
 	}
 	unlock_super = 1;
 
+	if (ocfs2_freeze_lock_supported(osb)) {
+		status = ocfs2_freeze_lock(osb, 0);
+		if (status < 0) {
+			mlog_errno(status);
+			goto leave;
+		}
+		unlock_freeze = 1;
+	}
+
 	/* This will load up the node map and add ourselves to it. */
 	status = ocfs2_find_slot(osb);
 	if (status < 0) {
@@ -1821,6 +1839,9 @@ static int ocfs2_mount_volume(struct super_block *sb)
 		mlog_errno(status);
 
 leave:
+	if (ocfs2_freeze_lock_supported(osb) && unlock_freeze)
+		ocfs2_freeze_unlock(osb, 0);
+
 	if (unlock_super)
 		ocfs2_super_unlock(osb, 1);
 
-- 
1.6.5.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ocfs2:freeze-thaw: initialization and cleanup
  2010-01-09 18:00 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ocfs2:freeze-thaw: initialization and cleanup Wengang Wang
@ 2010-01-15  1:53 ` Sunil Mushran
  2010-01-15  2:26   ` Wengang Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sunil Mushran @ 2010-01-15  1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ocfs2-devel

Wengang Wang wrote:
> this patch does some initialization and cleanup for freeze/thaw.
>
>   

Please capitalize the first letter of a sentence. ;)

> Authored-by: Tiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com>
> Authored-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h  |    1 +
>  fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>  fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c     |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/ocfs2/super.c       |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h
> index b5786a7..489c599 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h
> @@ -217,4 +217,5 @@ void dlm_register_eviction_cb(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
>  			      struct dlm_eviction_cb *cb);
>  void dlm_unregister_eviction_cb(struct dlm_eviction_cb *cb);
>  
> +int dlm_freeze_lock_supported(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm);
>  #endif /* DLMAPI_H */
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
> index 437698e..ad15a66 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
> @@ -764,3 +764,15 @@ error:
>  	return status;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dlmlock);
> +
> +int dlm_freeze_lock_supported(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm)
> +{
> +	if (dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_major == 1)
> +		return (dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor >= 1);
> +
> +	if (dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_major > 1)
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dlm_freeze_lock_supported);
>   

Change the fs protocol. We shouldn't need to export any symbols.

> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> index 0caa69e..cf88af2 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ static int ocfs2_check_refcount_downconvert(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>  					    int new_level);
>  static int ocfs2_refcount_convert_worker(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>  					 int blocking);
> +static int ocfs2_check_freeze_downconvert(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
> +					  int new_level);
>  
>  #define mlog_meta_lvb(__level, __lockres) ocfs2_dump_meta_lvb_info(__level, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __LINE__, __lockres)
>  
> @@ -290,6 +292,11 @@ static struct ocfs2_lock_res_ops ocfs2_refcount_block_lops = {
>  	.flags		= 0,
>  };
>  
> +static struct ocfs2_lock_res_ops ocfs2_freeze_lops = {
> +	.check_downconvert = ocfs2_check_freeze_downconvert,
> +	.flags		= 0,
> +};
> +
>  static inline int ocfs2_is_inode_lock(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres)
>  {
>  	return lockres->l_type == OCFS2_LOCK_TYPE_META ||
> @@ -722,6 +729,15 @@ void ocfs2_refcount_lock_res_init(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>  				   &ocfs2_refcount_block_lops, osb);
>  }
>  
> +static void ocfs2_freeze_lock_res_init(struct ocfs2_lock_res *res,
> +				       struct ocfs2_super *osb)
> +{
> +	ocfs2_lock_res_init_once(res);
> +	ocfs2_build_lock_name(OCFS2_LOCK_TYPE_FREEZE, 0, 0, res->l_name);
> +	ocfs2_lock_res_init_common(osb, res, OCFS2_LOCK_TYPE_FREEZE,
> +				   &ocfs2_freeze_lops, osb);
> +}
> +
>  void ocfs2_lock_res_free(struct ocfs2_lock_res *res)
>  {
>  	mlog_entry_void();
> @@ -3006,6 +3022,7 @@ local:
>  	ocfs2_rename_lock_res_init(&osb->osb_rename_lockres, osb);
>  	ocfs2_nfs_sync_lock_res_init(&osb->osb_nfs_sync_lockres, osb);
>  	ocfs2_orphan_scan_lock_res_init(&osb->osb_orphan_scan.os_lockres, osb);
> +	ocfs2_freeze_lock_res_init(&osb->osb_freeze_lockres, osb);
>  
>  	osb->cconn = conn;
>  
> @@ -3043,6 +3060,7 @@ void ocfs2_dlm_shutdown(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>  	ocfs2_lock_res_free(&osb->osb_rename_lockres);
>  	ocfs2_lock_res_free(&osb->osb_nfs_sync_lockres);
>  	ocfs2_lock_res_free(&osb->osb_orphan_scan.os_lockres);
> +	ocfs2_lock_res_free(&osb->osb_freeze_lockres);
>  
>  	ocfs2_cluster_disconnect(osb->cconn, hangup_pending);
>  	osb->cconn = NULL;
> @@ -3228,6 +3246,7 @@ static void ocfs2_drop_osb_locks(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
>  	ocfs2_simple_drop_lockres(osb, &osb->osb_rename_lockres);
>  	ocfs2_simple_drop_lockres(osb, &osb->osb_nfs_sync_lockres);
>  	ocfs2_simple_drop_lockres(osb, &osb->osb_orphan_scan.os_lockres);
> +	ocfs2_simple_drop_lockres(osb, &osb->osb_freeze_lockres);
>  }
>  
>  int ocfs2_drop_inode_locks(struct inode *inode)
> @@ -3909,6 +3928,11 @@ void ocfs2_set_locking_protocol(void)
>  	ocfs2_stack_glue_set_locking_protocol(&lproto);
>  }
>  
> +static int ocfs2_check_freeze_downconvert(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
> +					  int new_level)
> +{
> +	return 1; //change me
> +}
>   

If it's going to return 1 always, then we don't need it.

>  
>  static void ocfs2_process_blocked_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>  				       struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres)
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/super.c b/fs/ocfs2/super.c
> index 14f47d2..9127760 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/super.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ static void ocfs2_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode);
>  static int ocfs2_susp_quotas(struct ocfs2_super *osb, int unsuspend);
>  static int ocfs2_enable_quotas(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
>  static void ocfs2_disable_quotas(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
> +static int ocfs2_freeze_lock_supported(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
>  
>  static const struct super_operations ocfs2_sops = {
>  	.statfs		= ocfs2_statfs,
> @@ -1772,10 +1773,18 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super_block *sb,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int ocfs2_freeze_lock_supported(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
> +{
> +	if (!osb->cconn || !osb->cconn->cc_lockspace)
> +		return 0;
> +	return dlm_freeze_lock_supported(osb->cconn->cc_lockspace);
> +}
> +
>  static int ocfs2_mount_volume(struct super_block *sb)
>  {
>  	int status = 0;
>  	int unlock_super = 0;
> +	int unlock_freeze = 0;
>  	struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(sb);
>  
>  	mlog_entry_void();
> @@ -1796,6 +1805,15 @@ static int ocfs2_mount_volume(struct super_block *sb)
>  	}
>  	unlock_super = 1;
>  
> +	if (ocfs2_freeze_lock_supported(osb)) {
> +		status = ocfs2_freeze_lock(osb, 0);
> +		if (status < 0) {
> +			mlog_errno(status);
> +			goto leave;
> +		}
> +		unlock_freeze = 1;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* This will load up the node map and add ourselves to it. */
>  	status = ocfs2_find_slot(osb);
>  	if (status < 0) {
> @@ -1821,6 +1839,9 @@ static int ocfs2_mount_volume(struct super_block *sb)
>  		mlog_errno(status);
>  
>  leave:
> +	if (ocfs2_freeze_lock_supported(osb) && unlock_freeze)
> +		ocfs2_freeze_unlock(osb, 0);
> +
>  	if (unlock_super)
>  		ocfs2_super_unlock(osb, 1);
>   

What about cleanup in umount?

>  
>   

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ocfs2:freeze-thaw: initialization and cleanup
  2010-01-15  1:53 ` Sunil Mushran
@ 2010-01-15  2:26   ` Wengang Wang
  2010-01-15  2:36     ` Sunil Mushran
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2010-01-15  2:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ocfs2-devel

Hi Sunil,

On 10-01-14 17:53, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> Wengang Wang wrote:
>> this patch does some initialization and cleanup for freeze/thaw.
>
> Please capitalize the first letter of a sentence. ;)

Ok. :)
>
>> Authored-by: Tiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com>
>> Authored-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h  |    1 +
>>  fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>>  fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c     |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  fs/ocfs2/super.c       |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h
>> index b5786a7..489c599 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmapi.h
>> @@ -217,4 +217,5 @@ void dlm_register_eviction_cb(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
>>  			      struct dlm_eviction_cb *cb);
>>  void dlm_unregister_eviction_cb(struct dlm_eviction_cb *cb);
>>  +int dlm_freeze_lock_supported(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm);
>>  #endif /* DLMAPI_H */
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
>> index 437698e..ad15a66 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
>> @@ -764,3 +764,15 @@ error:
>>  	return status;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dlmlock);
>> +
>> +int dlm_freeze_lock_supported(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm)
>> +{
>> +	if (dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_major == 1)
>> +		return (dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor >= 1);
>> +
>> +	if (dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_major > 1)
>> +		return 1;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dlm_freeze_lock_supported);
>>   
>
> Change the fs protocol. We shouldn't need to export any symbols.

yes, as you said.
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>> index 0caa69e..cf88af2 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ static int ocfs2_check_refcount_downconvert(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>  					    int new_level);
>>  static int ocfs2_refcount_convert_worker(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>  					 int blocking);
>> +static int ocfs2_check_freeze_downconvert(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>> +					  int new_level);
>>   #define mlog_meta_lvb(__level, __lockres) 
>> ocfs2_dump_meta_lvb_info(__level, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __LINE__, 
>> __lockres)
>>  @@ -290,6 +292,11 @@ static struct ocfs2_lock_res_ops 
>> ocfs2_refcount_block_lops = {
>>  	.flags		= 0,
>>  };
>>  +static struct ocfs2_lock_res_ops ocfs2_freeze_lops = {
>> +	.check_downconvert = ocfs2_check_freeze_downconvert,
>> +	.flags		= 0,
>> +};
>> +
>>  static inline int ocfs2_is_inode_lock(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres)
>>  {
>>  	return lockres->l_type == OCFS2_LOCK_TYPE_META ||
>> @@ -722,6 +729,15 @@ void ocfs2_refcount_lock_res_init(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>  				   &ocfs2_refcount_block_lops, osb);
>>  }
>>  +static void ocfs2_freeze_lock_res_init(struct ocfs2_lock_res *res,
>> +				       struct ocfs2_super *osb)
>> +{
>> +	ocfs2_lock_res_init_once(res);
>> +	ocfs2_build_lock_name(OCFS2_LOCK_TYPE_FREEZE, 0, 0, res->l_name);
>> +	ocfs2_lock_res_init_common(osb, res, OCFS2_LOCK_TYPE_FREEZE,
>> +				   &ocfs2_freeze_lops, osb);
>> +}
>> +
>>  void ocfs2_lock_res_free(struct ocfs2_lock_res *res)
>>  {
>>  	mlog_entry_void();
>> @@ -3006,6 +3022,7 @@ local:
>>  	ocfs2_rename_lock_res_init(&osb->osb_rename_lockres, osb);
>>  	ocfs2_nfs_sync_lock_res_init(&osb->osb_nfs_sync_lockres, osb);
>>  	ocfs2_orphan_scan_lock_res_init(&osb->osb_orphan_scan.os_lockres, osb);
>> +	ocfs2_freeze_lock_res_init(&osb->osb_freeze_lockres, osb);
>>   	osb->cconn = conn;
>>  @@ -3043,6 +3060,7 @@ void ocfs2_dlm_shutdown(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>>  	ocfs2_lock_res_free(&osb->osb_rename_lockres);
>>  	ocfs2_lock_res_free(&osb->osb_nfs_sync_lockres);
>>  	ocfs2_lock_res_free(&osb->osb_orphan_scan.os_lockres);
>> +	ocfs2_lock_res_free(&osb->osb_freeze_lockres);
>>   	ocfs2_cluster_disconnect(osb->cconn, hangup_pending);
>>  	osb->cconn = NULL;
>> @@ -3228,6 +3246,7 @@ static void ocfs2_drop_osb_locks(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
>>  	ocfs2_simple_drop_lockres(osb, &osb->osb_rename_lockres);
>>  	ocfs2_simple_drop_lockres(osb, &osb->osb_nfs_sync_lockres);
>>  	ocfs2_simple_drop_lockres(osb, &osb->osb_orphan_scan.os_lockres);
>> +	ocfs2_simple_drop_lockres(osb, &osb->osb_freeze_lockres);
>>  }
>>   int ocfs2_drop_inode_locks(struct inode *inode)
>> @@ -3909,6 +3928,11 @@ void ocfs2_set_locking_protocol(void)
>>  	ocfs2_stack_glue_set_locking_protocol(&lproto);
>>  }
>>  +static int ocfs2_check_freeze_downconvert(struct ocfs2_lock_res 
>> *lockres,
>> +					  int new_level)
>> +{
>> +	return 1; //change me
>> +}
>>   
>
> If it's going to return 1 always, then we don't need it.

yes. it's changed in patch 3.
to separate big patch into sub ones, it's so written.
and until here, ocfs2_check_freeze_downconvert() shouldn't effect
anything since we don't support freeze/thaw so far to the patch.

>
>>   static void ocfs2_process_blocked_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>>  				       struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres)
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/super.c b/fs/ocfs2/super.c
>> index 14f47d2..9127760 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/super.c
>> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ static void ocfs2_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode);
>>  static int ocfs2_susp_quotas(struct ocfs2_super *osb, int unsuspend);
>>  static int ocfs2_enable_quotas(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
>>  static void ocfs2_disable_quotas(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
>> +static int ocfs2_freeze_lock_supported(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
>>   static const struct super_operations ocfs2_sops = {
>>  	.statfs		= ocfs2_statfs,
>> @@ -1772,10 +1773,18 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super_block *sb,
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  +static int ocfs2_freeze_lock_supported(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
>> +{
>> +	if (!osb->cconn || !osb->cconn->cc_lockspace)
>> +		return 0;
>> +	return dlm_freeze_lock_supported(osb->cconn->cc_lockspace);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int ocfs2_mount_volume(struct super_block *sb)
>>  {
>>  	int status = 0;
>>  	int unlock_super = 0;
>> +	int unlock_freeze = 0;
>>  	struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(sb);
>>   	mlog_entry_void();
>> @@ -1796,6 +1805,15 @@ static int ocfs2_mount_volume(struct super_block *sb)
>>  	}
>>  	unlock_super = 1;
>>  +	if (ocfs2_freeze_lock_supported(osb)) {
>> +		status = ocfs2_freeze_lock(osb, 0);
>> +		if (status < 0) {
>> +			mlog_errno(status);
>> +			goto leave;
>> +		}
>> +		unlock_freeze = 1;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	/* This will load up the node map and add ourselves to it. */
>>  	status = ocfs2_find_slot(osb);
>>  	if (status < 0) {
>> @@ -1821,6 +1839,9 @@ static int ocfs2_mount_volume(struct super_block *sb)
>>  		mlog_errno(status);
>>   leave:
>> +	if (ocfs2_freeze_lock_supported(osb) && unlock_freeze)
>> +		ocfs2_freeze_unlock(osb, 0);
>> +
>>  	if (unlock_super)
>>  		ocfs2_super_unlock(osb, 1);
>>   
>
> What about cleanup in umount?

if you meant ocfs2_freeze_unlock() in ocfs2_umount_volume() instead of
at the end of ocfs2_mount_volume(), it's NG.
if cleanup when umount, then we always have a ro_holder, freeze/thaw
doesn't work.

and we dont need to clean it up in umount if we already cleanup it in
mount_volume. this is because the lock/unlock is used in pairs.

regards,
wengang.
>
>>    
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ocfs2:freeze-thaw: initialization and cleanup
  2010-01-15  2:26   ` Wengang Wang
@ 2010-01-15  2:36     ` Sunil Mushran
  2010-01-15  2:41       ` Wengang Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sunil Mushran @ 2010-01-15  2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ocfs2-devel

Wengang Wang wrote:
> if you meant ocfs2_freeze_unlock() in ocfs2_umount_volume() instead of
> at the end of ocfs2_mount_volume(), it's NG.
> if cleanup when umount, then we always have a ro_holder, freeze/thaw
> doesn't work.
>
> and we dont need to clean it up in umount if we already cleanup it in
> mount_volume. this is because the lock/unlock is used in pairs.
>   

What's NG?

And I am not following you. Don't we have to free all locks during
umount?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ocfs2:freeze-thaw: initialization and cleanup
  2010-01-15  2:36     ` Sunil Mushran
@ 2010-01-15  2:41       ` Wengang Wang
  2010-01-15 21:36         ` Sunil Mushran
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2010-01-15  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ocfs2-devel

Hi Sunil,

On 10-01-14 18:36, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> Wengang Wang wrote:
>> if you meant ocfs2_freeze_unlock() in ocfs2_umount_volume() instead of
>> at the end of ocfs2_mount_volume(), it's NG.
>> if cleanup when umount, then we always have a ro_holder, freeze/thaw
>> doesn't work.
>>
>> and we dont need to clean it up in umount if we already cleanup it in
>> mount_volume. this is because the lock/unlock is used in pairs.
>>   
>
> What's NG?
>

NG is not good.
> And I am not following you. Don't we have to free all locks during
> umount?

we don't need to free it when we umount since we don't have that lock taken.
we lock/unlock it in mount, and in the downconvert action.

regards,
wengang.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ocfs2:freeze-thaw: initialization and cleanup
  2010-01-15  2:41       ` Wengang Wang
@ 2010-01-15 21:36         ` Sunil Mushran
  2010-01-17  8:52           ` Wengang Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sunil Mushran @ 2010-01-15 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ocfs2-devel

Wengang Wang wrote:
> we don't need to free it when we umount since we don't have that lock taken.
> we lock/unlock it in mount, and in the downconvert action.

We do have to free the lock. And you are doing it in 
ocfs2_dlm_shutdown(). ;)
I was looking at the wrong place. Sorry for the confusion.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ocfs2:freeze-thaw: initialization and cleanup
  2010-01-15 21:36         ` Sunil Mushran
@ 2010-01-17  8:52           ` Wengang Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2010-01-17  8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ocfs2-devel

Hi Sunil,

On 10-01-15 13:36, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> Wengang Wang wrote:
>> we don't need to free it when we umount since we don't have that lock taken.
>> we lock/unlock it in mount, and in the downconvert action.
>
> We do have to free the lock. And you are doing it in  
> ocfs2_dlm_shutdown(). ;)
> I was looking at the wrong place. Sorry for the confusion.

Oh, no.
I am sorry too for I had a bad understand.
by "free", you meant real "free", not unlock. and I thought you meant
unlock.

regards,
wengang.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-17  8:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-09 18:00 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ocfs2:freeze-thaw: initialization and cleanup Wengang Wang
2010-01-15  1:53 ` Sunil Mushran
2010-01-15  2:26   ` Wengang Wang
2010-01-15  2:36     ` Sunil Mushran
2010-01-15  2:41       ` Wengang Wang
2010-01-15 21:36         ` Sunil Mushran
2010-01-17  8:52           ` Wengang Wang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.