All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: Rework of guest debug state writing
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:41:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6AEAB8.3030509@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B6AE1E6.9040805@siemens.com>

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 01:33:50AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:29:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>> So far we synchronized any dirty VCPU state back into the kernel before
>>>>> updating the guest debug state. This was a tribute to a deficit in x86
>>>>> kernels before 2.6.33. But as this is an arch-dependent issue, it is
>>>>> better handle in the x86 part of KVM and remove the writeback point for
>>>>> generic code.
>>>> Jan,
>>>>
>>>> This patch breaks migration.
>>> Can you elaborate what you did? I can't reproduce, and I do not see any
>>> conceptual issue (given that guest debugging conflicts with migration
>>> anyway).
>> kvm-autotest fails (migration only, install is ok, both Linux and Win
>> guests). Not sure why, perhaps the unconditional KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG
>> corrupts state somehow? 
>>
>> Tested with io thread enabled.
> 
> That's this default-off thing, so... OK, confirmed, investigating.
> 

Heisenbug: It first also popped up (in form of a frozen migration
target) after removing this patch, but now it's totally unreproducible,
whatever patch I apply or revert from my series. Base is current master.
I tend to think there is a hidden issue of iothread vs. migration,
unrelated to this patch.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: Rework of guest debug state writing
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:41:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6AEAB8.3030509@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B6AE1E6.9040805@siemens.com>

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 01:33:50AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:29:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>> So far we synchronized any dirty VCPU state back into the kernel before
>>>>> updating the guest debug state. This was a tribute to a deficit in x86
>>>>> kernels before 2.6.33. But as this is an arch-dependent issue, it is
>>>>> better handle in the x86 part of KVM and remove the writeback point for
>>>>> generic code.
>>>> Jan,
>>>>
>>>> This patch breaks migration.
>>> Can you elaborate what you did? I can't reproduce, and I do not see any
>>> conceptual issue (given that guest debugging conflicts with migration
>>> anyway).
>> kvm-autotest fails (migration only, install is ok, both Linux and Win
>> guests). Not sure why, perhaps the unconditional KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG
>> corrupts state somehow? 
>>
>> Tested with io thread enabled.
> 
> That's this default-off thing, so... OK, confirmed, investigating.
> 

Heisenbug: It first also popped up (in form of a frozen migration
target) after removing this patch, but now it's totally unreproducible,
whatever patch I apply or revert from my series. Base is current master.
I tend to think there is a hidden issue of iothread vs. migration,
unrelated to this patch.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-04 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-03 21:29 [PATCH 0/4] KVM pull request: Various fixes and cleanups Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Fix up misreported CPU features Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29   ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: Make vmport KVM-compatible Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29   ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Move and rename regs_modified Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29   ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: Rework of guest debug state writing Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29   ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 23:49   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-03 23:49     ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04  0:33     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04  0:33       ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 13:00       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 13:00         ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 15:04         ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 15:04           ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 15:41           ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-02-04 15:41             ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 18:05             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 18:05               ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 18:53               ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 18:53                 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 19:00                 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 19:00                   ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-08 15:52                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-08 15:52                     ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-08 16:07                     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-08 16:07                       ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 19:21                 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 19:21                   ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 20:50                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 20:50                     ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-08 15:52                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-08 15:52                     ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-03 21:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] KVM pull request: Various fixes and cleanups Anthony Liguori
2010-02-03 21:54   ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B6AEAB8.3030509@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.