From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: "Ira W. Snyder" <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, sameo@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] can: add support for Janz VMOD-ICAN3 Intelligent CAN module
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:13:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA3DAF1.4090206@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100319200325.GE13672@ovro.caltech.edu>
Ira W. Snyder wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 04:45:09PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Ira W. Snyder wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:01:14AM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>> Hi Ira,
>>>>
>>>> we already discussed this patch on the SocketCAN mailing list and there
>>>> are just a few minor issues and the request to add support for the new
>>>> "berr-reporting" option, if feasible. See:
>>>>
>>>> commit 52c793f24054f5dc30d228e37e0e19cc8313f086
>>>> Author: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
>>>> Date: Mon Feb 22 22:21:17 2010 +0000
>>>>
>>>> can: netlink support for bus-error reporting and counters
>>>>
>>>> This patch makes the bus-error reporting configurable and allows to
>>>> retrieve the CAN TX and RX bus error counters via netlink interface.
>>>> I have added support for the SJA1000. The TX and RX bus error counters
>>>> are also copied to the data fields 6..7 of error messages when state
>>>> changes are reported.
>>>>
>>>> Should not be a big deal.
>>>>
>>> I think this patch came along since my last post of the driver. I must
>>> have missed it. I'll try and add support.
>> No problem, it's really new. Just just need to enable BEI depending on
>> CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING.
>>
>
> I have one final question about this.
>
> The documentation for the firmware isn't very specific here. I believe
> that in order to get any kind of error messages, I need the bus error
> feature turned on. What is the expected behavior of an SJA1000 with the
> BEI (bus error interrupt) turned off? Will you still get warning
> messages for ERROR_ACTIVE -> ERROR_PASSIVE state transitions?
Yes. State transitions are enabled with EI and EPI.
> I'm not sure how I would go about testing this feature, either. Ideas?
Send messages without cable connected and watch the error messages with
"candump any,0:0,#ffffffff". With "ip ... berr-reporting on" you should
see additional bus-errors.
> I also noticed that I can enable "self test mode" and "listen only mode"
> using the same firmware command. It appears that there are netlink
> messages for this as well. Should I try and support these, too? I don't
> really have any use for them (yet). I assume "self test mode" is
> equivalent to "loopback mode" in the netlink messages.
List-only is straight forward while "self test mode" is not exactly like
"loopback mode", IIRC. Feel free to send a follow-up patch when you have
time for a thorough implementation and testing. It's also on my to-do
list for the SJA1000.
Wolfgang.
>
> Thanks,
> Ira
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Ira W. Snyder" <iws-lulEs6mt1IksTUYHLfqkUA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] can: add support for Janz VMOD-ICAN3 Intelligent CAN module
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:13:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA3DAF1.4090206@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100319200325.GE13672-lulEs6mt1IksTUYHLfqkUA@public.gmane.org>
Ira W. Snyder wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 04:45:09PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Ira W. Snyder wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:01:14AM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>> Hi Ira,
>>>>
>>>> we already discussed this patch on the SocketCAN mailing list and there
>>>> are just a few minor issues and the request to add support for the new
>>>> "berr-reporting" option, if feasible. See:
>>>>
>>>> commit 52c793f24054f5dc30d228e37e0e19cc8313f086
>>>> Author: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
>>>> Date: Mon Feb 22 22:21:17 2010 +0000
>>>>
>>>> can: netlink support for bus-error reporting and counters
>>>>
>>>> This patch makes the bus-error reporting configurable and allows to
>>>> retrieve the CAN TX and RX bus error counters via netlink interface.
>>>> I have added support for the SJA1000. The TX and RX bus error counters
>>>> are also copied to the data fields 6..7 of error messages when state
>>>> changes are reported.
>>>>
>>>> Should not be a big deal.
>>>>
>>> I think this patch came along since my last post of the driver. I must
>>> have missed it. I'll try and add support.
>> No problem, it's really new. Just just need to enable BEI depending on
>> CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING.
>>
>
> I have one final question about this.
>
> The documentation for the firmware isn't very specific here. I believe
> that in order to get any kind of error messages, I need the bus error
> feature turned on. What is the expected behavior of an SJA1000 with the
> BEI (bus error interrupt) turned off? Will you still get warning
> messages for ERROR_ACTIVE -> ERROR_PASSIVE state transitions?
Yes. State transitions are enabled with EI and EPI.
> I'm not sure how I would go about testing this feature, either. Ideas?
Send messages without cable connected and watch the error messages with
"candump any,0:0,#ffffffff". With "ip ... berr-reporting on" you should
see additional bus-errors.
> I also noticed that I can enable "self test mode" and "listen only mode"
> using the same firmware command. It appears that there are netlink
> messages for this as well. Should I try and support these, too? I don't
> really have any use for them (yet). I assume "self test mode" is
> equivalent to "loopback mode" in the netlink messages.
List-only is straight forward while "self test mode" is not exactly like
"loopback mode", IIRC. Feel free to send a follow-up patch when you have
time for a thorough implementation and testing. It's also on my to-do
list for the SJA1000.
Wolfgang.
>
> Thanks,
> Ira
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-19 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 16:38 [PATCH 2/3] can: add support for Janz VMOD-ICAN3 Intelligent CAN module Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-19 9:01 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-19 9:01 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-19 15:19 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-19 15:19 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-19 15:45 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-19 20:03 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-19 20:13 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2010-03-19 20:13 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-19 21:52 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-20 7:55 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-20 7:55 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-22 15:53 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-22 15:53 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-22 19:17 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-22 19:17 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-22 19:23 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-22 19:23 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-22 20:12 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-22 20:12 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-22 20:10 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-22 20:10 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-22 20:28 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-22 20:28 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-22 20:51 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-22 20:51 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-22 21:24 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-22 21:24 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-29 16:58 Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-29 16:58 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-30 8:14 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-30 8:14 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-31 6:46 ` David Miller
2010-04-01 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-02 0:43 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-04-02 0:43 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-02 21:22 [PATCH 0/3 RFCv4] add support for Janz MODULbus devices Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-02 21:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] can: add support for Janz VMOD-ICAN3 Intelligent CAN module Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-17 19:33 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-18 8:36 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-03-18 15:19 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-03-18 16:06 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA3DAF1.4090206@grandegger.com \
--to=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=iws@ovro.caltech.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.