All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	andi.kleen@intel.com, cl@linux-foundation.org,
	fengguang.wu@intel.com, mel@csn.ul.ie, tj@kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	minskey guo <chaohong.guo@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu_up: hold zonelists_mutex when build_all_zonelists
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:05:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFB5AAE.1060609@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100521130808.919ecb35.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2010 11:23:16 +0800
> Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> Here is another issue, we should always hold zonelists_mutex when calling build_all_zonelists
>> unless system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING.
> 
> Taking a global mutex in the cpu-hotplug code is worrisome.  Perhaps
> because of the two years spent weeding out strange deadlocks between
> cpu-hotplug and cpufreq.
> 
> Has this change been carefully and fully tested with lockdep enabled
> (please)?
Yes, Andrew. I've tested it with lockdep enabled, and there was *no*
issue found for this change in my testing.

My test box: CPUs on node 1~3 are all offlined (16 cpus per node).
Here are my test steps:
on tty0:
# cd /sys/devices/system/node/node1
# for i in cpu*; do echo 1 > $i/online; done

on tty1:
# cd /sys/devices/system/node/node2
# for i in cpu*; do echo 1 > $i/online; done

on tty2:
# cd /sys/devices/system/node/node3
# for i in cpu*; do echo 1 > $i/online; done

on tty3:
# cat zonelist

	#! /bin/bash
	set -x
	while ((1)); do
		echo n > /proc/sys/vm/numa_zonelist_order
		sleep 10
		echo z > /proc/sys/vm/numa_zonelist_order
		sleep 10
	done

# ./zonelist

Besides, I also ran some cpu online/offline tests from LTP/cpu_hotplug test suites.
They worked fine too.

>> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
>> @@ -357,8 +357,11 @@ int __cpuinit cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
>>                  return -ENOMEM;
>>          }
>>
>> -       if (pgdat->node_zonelists->_zonerefs->zone == NULL)
>> +       if (pgdat->node_zonelists->_zonerefs->zone == NULL) {
>> +               mutex_lock(&zonelists_mutex);
>>                  build_all_zonelists(NULL);
>> +               mutex_unlock(&zonelists_mutex);
>> +       }
> 
> Your email client is performing space-stuffing and it replaces tabs
> with spaces.  This requires me to edit the patches rather a lot,
> which is dull.

Really sorry for the inconvenience to you. I'll pay more attention
next time. thank you!

-haicheng

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	andi.kleen@intel.com, cl@linux-foundation.org,
	fengguang.wu@intel.com, mel@csn.ul.ie, tj@kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	minskey guo <chaohong.guo@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu_up: hold zonelists_mutex when build_all_zonelists
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:05:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFB5AAE.1060609@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100521130808.919ecb35.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2010 11:23:16 +0800
> Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> Here is another issue, we should always hold zonelists_mutex when calling build_all_zonelists
>> unless system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING.
> 
> Taking a global mutex in the cpu-hotplug code is worrisome.  Perhaps
> because of the two years spent weeding out strange deadlocks between
> cpu-hotplug and cpufreq.
> 
> Has this change been carefully and fully tested with lockdep enabled
> (please)?
Yes, Andrew. I've tested it with lockdep enabled, and there was *no*
issue found for this change in my testing.

My test box: CPUs on node 1~3 are all offlined (16 cpus per node).
Here are my test steps:
on tty0:
# cd /sys/devices/system/node/node1
# for i in cpu*; do echo 1 > $i/online; done

on tty1:
# cd /sys/devices/system/node/node2
# for i in cpu*; do echo 1 > $i/online; done

on tty2:
# cd /sys/devices/system/node/node3
# for i in cpu*; do echo 1 > $i/online; done

on tty3:
# cat zonelist

	#! /bin/bash
	set -x
	while ((1)); do
		echo n > /proc/sys/vm/numa_zonelist_order
		sleep 10
		echo z > /proc/sys/vm/numa_zonelist_order
		sleep 10
	done

# ./zonelist

Besides, I also ran some cpu online/offline tests from LTP/cpu_hotplug test suites.
They worked fine too.

>> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
>> @@ -357,8 +357,11 @@ int __cpuinit cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
>>                  return -ENOMEM;
>>          }
>>
>> -       if (pgdat->node_zonelists->_zonerefs->zone == NULL)
>> +       if (pgdat->node_zonelists->_zonerefs->zone == NULL) {
>> +               mutex_lock(&zonelists_mutex);
>>                  build_all_zonelists(NULL);
>> +               mutex_unlock(&zonelists_mutex);
>> +       }
> 
> Your email client is performing space-stuffing and it replaces tabs
> with spaces.  This requires me to edit the patches rather a lot,
> which is dull.

Really sorry for the inconvenience to you. I'll pay more attention
next time. thank you!

-haicheng

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-25  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-19 22:54 + mem-hotplug-avoid-multiple-zones-sharing-same-boot-strapping-boot_pageset-fix.patch added to -mm tree akpm
2010-05-20  3:23 ` [PATCH] cpu_up: hold zonelists_mutex when build_all_zonelists Haicheng Li
2010-05-20  3:23   ` Haicheng Li
2010-05-21 20:08   ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-21 20:08     ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-25  5:05     ` Haicheng Li [this message]
2010-05-25  5:05       ` Haicheng Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BFB5AAE.1060609@linux.intel.com \
    --to=haicheng.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
    --cc=chaohong.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.