All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] at91rm9200dk -AT49BV642D flash
@ 2010-06-11 10:53 rajeesh
  2010-06-11 11:19 ` Albert ARIBAUD
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: rajeesh @ 2010-06-11 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot


Hi all,

We have at91rm9200dk board it is working with AT49BV642D now can we
change flash to  AT49BV642DT 

without touching the source code.  (in uboot  or kernel ) .

We are not using this flash for booting the uboot ( used for storing log
files in application side) 

So is there any modification required in code. 


With Best Regards 
Rajeesh.R | +91-9895842332 | rajeesr at cms.com |
Work is Worship Duty is God  

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] at91rm9200dk -AT49BV642D flash
  2010-06-11 10:53 [U-Boot] at91rm9200dk -AT49BV642D flash rajeesh
@ 2010-06-11 11:19 ` Albert ARIBAUD
  2010-06-11 12:19   ` Wolfgang Denk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Albert ARIBAUD @ 2010-06-11 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Le 11/06/2010 12:53, rajeesh a ?crit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> We have at91rm9200dk board it is working with AT49BV642D now can we
> change flash to  AT49BV642DT
>
> without touching the source code.  (in uboot  or kernel ) .
>
> We are not using this flash for booting the uboot ( used for storing log
> files in application side)
>
> So is there any modification required in code.

If that Flash is not used by U-boot, then replacing it (or removing it 
altogether) will obviously not affect U-boot.

What would be affected is the application that U-boot will transfer 
control to, but that's outside the scope of this list.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] at91rm9200dk -AT49BV642D flash
  2010-06-11 11:19 ` Albert ARIBAUD
@ 2010-06-11 12:19   ` Wolfgang Denk
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2010-06-11 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Dear Albert ARIBAUD,

In message <4C121BA7.5070108@free.fr> you wrote:
>
> > So is there any modification required in code.
> 
> If that Flash is not used by U-boot, then replacing it (or removing it
> altogether) will obviously not affect U-boot.

This is not really correct.

On the DK you can boot from NOR flash, and then the flash is extremely
important for U-Boot.

But the only really critical thing is if the location and size of the
environment sector mtches; as far as I can see the default location
has it at offset 0x50000, i. e. already in the "big" 0x10000 uniformly
sized sectors.

So replacing the flashes with a top sector type should be uncritical,
indeed.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Computers make excellent and efficient servants, but I have  no  wish
to  serve under them. Captain, a starship also runs on loyalty to one
man. And nothing can replace it or him.
	-- Spock, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4729.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-11 12:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-11 10:53 [U-Boot] at91rm9200dk -AT49BV642D flash rajeesh
2010-06-11 11:19 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-06-11 12:19   ` Wolfgang Denk

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.