* [U-Boot] at91rm9200dk -AT49BV642D flash
@ 2010-06-11 10:53 rajeesh
2010-06-11 11:19 ` Albert ARIBAUD
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: rajeesh @ 2010-06-11 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi all,
We have at91rm9200dk board it is working with AT49BV642D now can we
change flash to AT49BV642DT
without touching the source code. (in uboot or kernel ) .
We are not using this flash for booting the uboot ( used for storing log
files in application side)
So is there any modification required in code.
With Best Regards
Rajeesh.R | +91-9895842332 | rajeesr at cms.com |
Work is Worship Duty is God
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] at91rm9200dk -AT49BV642D flash
2010-06-11 10:53 [U-Boot] at91rm9200dk -AT49BV642D flash rajeesh
@ 2010-06-11 11:19 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-06-11 12:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Albert ARIBAUD @ 2010-06-11 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Le 11/06/2010 12:53, rajeesh a ?crit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> We have at91rm9200dk board it is working with AT49BV642D now can we
> change flash to AT49BV642DT
>
> without touching the source code. (in uboot or kernel ) .
>
> We are not using this flash for booting the uboot ( used for storing log
> files in application side)
>
> So is there any modification required in code.
If that Flash is not used by U-boot, then replacing it (or removing it
altogether) will obviously not affect U-boot.
What would be affected is the application that U-boot will transfer
control to, but that's outside the scope of this list.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] at91rm9200dk -AT49BV642D flash
2010-06-11 11:19 ` Albert ARIBAUD
@ 2010-06-11 12:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2010-06-11 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <4C121BA7.5070108@free.fr> you wrote:
>
> > So is there any modification required in code.
>
> If that Flash is not used by U-boot, then replacing it (or removing it
> altogether) will obviously not affect U-boot.
This is not really correct.
On the DK you can boot from NOR flash, and then the flash is extremely
important for U-Boot.
But the only really critical thing is if the location and size of the
environment sector mtches; as far as I can see the default location
has it at offset 0x50000, i. e. already in the "big" 0x10000 uniformly
sized sectors.
So replacing the flashes with a top sector type should be uncritical,
indeed.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Computers make excellent and efficient servants, but I have no wish
to serve under them. Captain, a starship also runs on loyalty to one
man. And nothing can replace it or him.
-- Spock, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4729.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-11 12:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-11 10:53 [U-Boot] at91rm9200dk -AT49BV642D flash rajeesh
2010-06-11 11:19 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-06-11 12:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.