From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
To: kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: cleanup: remove kvm_get_dirty_log()
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:56:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C21CD59.9020000@oss.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100623150134.9fb5915b.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
(2010/06/23 17:48), Avi Kivity wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>> index 801d9f3..bea6f7c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>> @@ -1185,28 +1185,43 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> ulong ga, ga_end;
>> - int is_dirty = 0;
>> - int r;
>> + unsigned long is_dirty = 0;
>> + int r, i;
>> unsigned long n;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>>
>> - r = kvm_get_dirty_log(kvm, log,&is_dirty);
>> - if (r)
>> + r = -EINVAL;
>> + if (log->slot>= KVM_MEMORY_SLOTS)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + memslot =&kvm->memslots->memslots[log->slot];
>
> Not introduced by this patch, but shouldn't this use rcu_dereference()?
>
>
I was thinking like that, but sorry I don't know well about ppc.
My final goal is to make everything except
/* If nothing is dirty, don't bother messing with page tables. */
part arch independent, so that we can concentrate on the truely
dirty logging things in the future.
So, making ppc code same as x86, rcu_dereference() for example , really
helps me.
Do you like this approach?
Takuya
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
To: Avi Kivity <avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: mtosatti-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
agraf-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org,
kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kvm-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kvm-ppc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
takuya.yoshikawa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: cleanup: remove kvm_get_dirty_log()
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:56:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C21CD59.9020000@oss.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C21CA5D.4060800-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
(2010/06/23 17:48), Avi Kivity wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>> index 801d9f3..bea6f7c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>> @@ -1185,28 +1185,43 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> ulong ga, ga_end;
>> - int is_dirty = 0;
>> - int r;
>> + unsigned long is_dirty = 0;
>> + int r, i;
>> unsigned long n;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>>
>> - r = kvm_get_dirty_log(kvm, log,&is_dirty);
>> - if (r)
>> + r = -EINVAL;
>> + if (log->slot>= KVM_MEMORY_SLOTS)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + memslot =&kvm->memslots->memslots[log->slot];
>
> Not introduced by this patch, but shouldn't this use rcu_dereference()?
>
>
I was thinking like that, but sorry I don't know well about ppc.
My final goal is to make everything except
/* If nothing is dirty, don't bother messing with page tables. */
part arch independent, so that we can concentrate on the truely
dirty logging things in the future.
So, making ppc code same as x86, rcu_dereference() for example , really
helps me.
Do you like this approach?
Takuya
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya-gVGce1chcLdL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: mtosatti-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
agraf-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org,
kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kvm-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kvm-ppc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
takuya.yoshikawa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: cleanup: remove kvm_get_dirty_log()
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:01:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C21CD59.9020000@oss.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C21CA5D.4060800-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
(2010/06/23 17:48), Avi Kivity wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>> index 801d9f3..bea6f7c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>> @@ -1185,28 +1185,43 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> ulong ga, ga_end;
>> - int is_dirty = 0;
>> - int r;
>> + unsigned long is_dirty = 0;
>> + int r, i;
>> unsigned long n;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>>
>> - r = kvm_get_dirty_log(kvm, log,&is_dirty);
>> - if (r)
>> + r = -EINVAL;
>> + if (log->slot>= KVM_MEMORY_SLOTS)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + memslot =&kvm->memslots->memslots[log->slot];
>
> Not introduced by this patch, but shouldn't this use rcu_dereference()?
>
>
I was thinking like that, but sorry I don't know well about ppc.
My final goal is to make everything except
/* If nothing is dirty, don't bother messing with page tables. */
part arch independent, so that we can concentrate on the truely
dirty logging things in the future.
So, making ppc code same as x86, rcu_dereference() for example , really
helps me.
Do you like this approach?
Takuya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-23 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-23 6:01 [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: cleanup: remove kvm_get_dirty_log() Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 6:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 6:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 8:48 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-23 8:48 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-23 8:48 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-23 8:56 ` Takuya Yoshikawa [this message]
2010-06-23 9:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 8:56 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 9:00 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-23 9:00 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-23 9:00 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-24 0:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-24 0:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-24 0:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-24 8:10 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-24 8:10 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-24 8:10 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-25 19:25 ` Alexander Graf
2010-06-25 19:25 ` Alexander Graf
2010-06-25 19:25 ` Alexander Graf
2010-06-26 0:38 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-26 0:38 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-26 0:38 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-26 0:55 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-26 0:55 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-26 0:55 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-26 9:38 ` Alexander Graf
2010-06-26 9:38 ` Alexander Graf
2010-06-26 9:38 ` Alexander Graf
2010-06-27 7:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-27 7:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-27 7:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 8:14 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-28 8:14 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-28 8:14 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-28 9:36 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 9:36 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 9:36 ` Avi Kivity
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-23 6:02 [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: cleanup: make kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log() arch Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 6:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: cleanup: make kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log() arch independent Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 6:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: cleanup: make kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log() arch Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 5:59 [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: ia64: cleanup kvm_ia64_sync_dirty_log() Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 6:00 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 5:59 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 5:59 [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: ia64: fix dirty_log_lock spin_lock section not Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: ia64: fix dirty_log_lock spin_lock section not to include get_dirty_log() Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: ia64: fix dirty_log_lock spin_lock section not Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 5:58 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log() fix and cleanup Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 5:58 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 5:58 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-23 8:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-23 8:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-23 8:50 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C21CD59.9020000@oss.ntt.co.jp \
--to=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.