From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Cris Daniluk <cris.daniluk@gmail.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.0 crashes with pvops kernel
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:29:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C23257E.4070308@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C17A2F9020000780000688F@vpn.id2.novell.com>
On 06/15/2010 02:57 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Actually, that's a difference to non-pv-ops that I strongly
> believe should be fixed: While in the traditional kernel
> __direct_remap_pfn_range() is used to establish I/O memory
> mappings (and hence there is a way to propagate errors), the
> pv-ops kernel appears to use ioremap_page_range() - just like
> native - which can only return -ENOMEM (upon page table
> allocation failure), due to the lack of a return value from
> set_pte_at().
>
So that ioremap() itself will return an error if Xen prevents a mapping?
> But then again I must be missing something here, since
> xen_set_pte_at() falls back to xen_set_pte() if the hypercall
> it tries first fails, and that one would fault when establishing
> the mapping, not when trying to first use it. Jeremy?
>
If the pte has _PAGE_IO set (which all ioremap ptes should), then it
will call xen_set_iomap_pte. This can't fail (not return code), so if
the hypercall fails then it will leave it unmapped. It should at least
print a warn-on in that case.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-24 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-14 22:10 Xen 4.0 crashes with pvops kernel Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 6:54 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <AANLkTimslcbXQnihpIB0c-ceWbD7H-eyUY_BV2igyfzv@mail.gmail.com>
2010-06-15 12:50 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 12:56 ` Keir Fraser
2010-06-15 13:20 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 13:24 ` Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 13:43 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 13:49 ` Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 14:13 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 14:35 ` Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 14:58 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 15:01 ` Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 15:21 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 16:18 ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-06-15 14:17 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-06-15 15:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-16 14:42 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 13:57 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 15:15 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-16 14:36 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-24 9:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2010-06-24 11:30 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-24 21:25 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C23257E.4070308@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=cris.daniluk@gmail.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.