All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>, Cris Daniluk <cris.daniluk@gmail.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.0 crashes with pvops kernel
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:56:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C83D3707.178AF%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C17932F0200007800006821@vpn.id2.novell.com>

On 15/06/2010 13:50, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:

> But even if we verify that the references come from some ACPI
> method(s), likely the only way to address this is to fix the kernel
> side error handling.
> 
> Keir, assuming these are reads only, would it make sense to permit
> Dom0 to map the IO-APIC space read-only? Perhaps even
> transparently converting writeable mappings to read-only ones
> (since drivers/acpi/osl.c tries to establish writeable mappings
> irrespective of the actual needs)? The obvious danger in doing
> so is that going forward there may appear fields in that page
> reads of which aren't side effect free...

Well, how come it works with other Linux kernels -- presumably they have
some extra error handling in the ACPI subsystem? Shouldn't that just be
added to this kernel?

 -- Keir

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-15 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-14 22:10 Xen 4.0 crashes with pvops kernel Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15  6:54 ` Jan Beulich
     [not found]   ` <AANLkTimslcbXQnihpIB0c-ceWbD7H-eyUY_BV2igyfzv@mail.gmail.com>
2010-06-15 12:50     ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 12:56       ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2010-06-15 13:20         ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 13:24           ` Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 13:43             ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 13:49               ` Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 14:13                 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 14:35                   ` Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 14:58                     ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 15:01                       ` Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 15:21                         ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 16:18                           ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-06-15 14:17               ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-06-15 15:11                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-16 14:42                   ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 13:57           ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 15:15             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-16 14:36               ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-24  9:29             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-24 11:30               ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-24 21:25                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C83D3707.178AF%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=cris.daniluk@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.