From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Linux Driver Project <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] Remove need for explicit device initialization
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:08:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C60C9C4.4000902@vflare.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinsoHUb307N+v6pGfRraHK-epBU70fD0FxPCNup@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/10/2010 12:06 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> wrote:
>> Currently, the user has to explicitly write a positive value to
>> initstate sysfs node before the device can be used. This event
>> triggers allocation of per-device metadata like memory pool,
>> table array and so on.
>>
>> We do not pre-initialize all zram devices since the 'table' array,
>> mapping disk blocks to compressed chunks, takes considerable amount
>> of memory (8 bytes per page). So, pre-initializing all devices will
>> be quite wasteful if only few or none of the devices are actually
>> used.
>>
>> This explicit device initialization from user is an odd requirement and
>> can be easily avoided. We now initialize the device when first write is
>> done to the device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
>
> AFAICT, most hardware block device drivers do things like this in the
> probe function. Why can't we do that for zram as well and drop the
> ->init_done and ->init_lock parts?
>
I think probe is only for PCI devices? Maybe should hook into open function
in struct block_device_operations. That way, we can also drop init_done and
init_lock parts.
Thanks,
Nitin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Linux Driver Project <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] Remove need for explicit device initialization
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:08:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C60C9C4.4000902@vflare.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinsoHUb307N+v6pGfRraHK-epBU70fD0FxPCNup@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/10/2010 12:06 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> wrote:
>> Currently, the user has to explicitly write a positive value to
>> initstate sysfs node before the device can be used. This event
>> triggers allocation of per-device metadata like memory pool,
>> table array and so on.
>>
>> We do not pre-initialize all zram devices since the 'table' array,
>> mapping disk blocks to compressed chunks, takes considerable amount
>> of memory (8 bytes per page). So, pre-initializing all devices will
>> be quite wasteful if only few or none of the devices are actually
>> used.
>>
>> This explicit device initialization from user is an odd requirement and
>> can be easily avoided. We now initialize the device when first write is
>> done to the device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
>
> AFAICT, most hardware block device drivers do things like this in the
> probe function. Why can't we do that for zram as well and drop the
> ->init_done and ->init_lock parts?
>
I think probe is only for PCI devices? Maybe should hook into open function
in struct block_device_operations. That way, we can also drop init_done and
init_lock parts.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-10 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-09 17:26 [PATCH 00/10] zram: various improvements and cleanups Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] Replace ioctls with sysfs interface Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 18:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 18:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 3:06 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 3:06 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-31 23:06 ` Dave Hansen
2010-08-31 23:06 ` Dave Hansen
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] Remove need for explicit device initialization Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 18:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 18:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 3:38 ` Nitin Gupta [this message]
2010-08-10 3:38 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] Use percpu stats Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 18:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 18:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 4:34 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-10 4:34 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-11 16:39 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-11 16:39 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-11 17:18 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-11 17:18 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-30 16:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-30 16:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-31 20:31 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-31 20:31 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-31 21:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-31 21:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-31 21:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-31 21:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-31 21:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-31 21:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-01 20:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-01 20:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-01 20:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-01 20:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-02 0:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-02 0:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-31 5:36 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-08-31 5:36 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-01 3:41 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-01 3:41 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-01 3:51 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-01 3:51 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-17 20:59 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-17 20:59 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] Use percpu buffers Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 18:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 18:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 4:47 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 4:47 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 5:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 5:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 5:32 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 5:32 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 7:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 7:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 05/10] Reduce per table entry overhead by 4 bytes Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 18:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 18:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 4:55 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 4:55 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 06/10] Block discard support Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 19:03 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 19:03 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 2:23 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-10 2:23 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-10 2:23 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-10 4:54 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 4:54 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 4:54 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 15:54 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-10 15:54 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-10 15:54 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 07/10] Increase compressed page size threshold Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 18:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 18:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 08/10] Some cleanups Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 19:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 19:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 09/10] Update zram documentation Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 10/10] Document sysfs entries Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 19:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 19:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-31 22:37 ` [PATCH 00/10] zram: various improvements and cleanups Greg KH
2010-08-31 22:37 ` Greg KH
2010-09-01 3:32 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-01 3:32 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-09 17:24 ` OOM panics with zram Dave Hansen
2010-09-09 17:24 ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-09 19:07 ` [patch -rc] oom: always return a badness score of non-zero for eligible tasks David Rientjes
2010-09-09 19:07 ` David Rientjes
2010-09-09 19:48 ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-09 19:48 ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-09 21:00 ` David Rientjes
2010-09-09 21:00 ` David Rientjes
2010-09-09 21:10 ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-09 21:10 ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-09 21:40 ` David Rientjes
2010-09-09 21:40 ` David Rientjes
2010-10-03 18:41 ` OOM panics with zram Nitin Gupta
2010-10-03 18:41 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-03 19:27 ` Dave Hansen
2010-10-03 19:27 ` Dave Hansen
2010-10-03 19:40 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-03 19:40 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-04 11:08 ` Ed Tomlinson
2010-10-04 11:08 ` Ed Tomlinson
2010-10-05 23:43 ` Greg KH
2010-10-05 23:43 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 2:29 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-06 2:29 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-06 2:36 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 2:36 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 4:30 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-06 4:30 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-06 7:38 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-06 7:38 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-06 14:03 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 14:03 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 14:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-06 14:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-06 14:53 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-06 14:53 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-06 14:02 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 14:02 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C60C9C4.4000902@vflare.org \
--to=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.