From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Driver Project <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: OOM panics with zram
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:30:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CABFB6F.2070800@vflare.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101006023624.GA27685@kroah.com>
On 10/5/2010 10:36 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:29:34PM -0400, Nitin Gupta wrote:
>> On 10/5/2010 7:43 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:41:09PM -0400, Nitin Gupta wrote:
>>>> Also, please do not use linux-next/mainline version of compcache. Instead
>>>> just use version in the project repository here:
>>>> hg clone https://compcache.googlecode.com/hg/ compcache
>>>
>>> What? No, the reason we put this into the kernel was so that _everyone_
>>> could work on it, including the original developers. Going off and
>>> doing development somewhere else just isn't ok. Should I just delete
>>> this driver from the staging tree as you don't seem to want to work with
>>> the community at this point in time?
>>>
>>
>> Getting it out of -staging wasn't my intent. Community is the reason
>> that this project still exists.
>>
>>
>>>> This is updated much more frequently and has many more bug fixes over
>>>> the mainline. It will also be easier to fix bugs/add features much more
>>>> quickly in this repo rather than sending them to lkml which can take
>>>> long time.
>>>
>>> Yes, developing in your own sandbox can always be faster, but there is
>>> no feedback loop.
>>>
>>
>> I was finding it real hard to find time to properly discuss each patch
>> over LKML, so I thought of shifting focus to local project repository
>> and then later go through proper reviews.
>
> So, should I delete the version in staging, or are you going to send
> patches to sync it up with your development version?
>
Deleting it from staging would not help much. Much more helpful would
be to sync at least the mainline and linux-next version of the driver
so it's easier to develop against these kernel trees. Initially, I
thought -staging means that any reviewed change can quickly make it
to *both* linux-next and more importantly -staging in mainline. Working/
Testing against mainline is much smoother than against linux-next.
Thanks,
Nitin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Driver Project <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: OOM panics with zram
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:30:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CABFB6F.2070800@vflare.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101006023624.GA27685@kroah.com>
On 10/5/2010 10:36 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:29:34PM -0400, Nitin Gupta wrote:
>> On 10/5/2010 7:43 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:41:09PM -0400, Nitin Gupta wrote:
>>>> Also, please do not use linux-next/mainline version of compcache. Instead
>>>> just use version in the project repository here:
>>>> hg clone https://compcache.googlecode.com/hg/ compcache
>>>
>>> What? No, the reason we put this into the kernel was so that _everyone_
>>> could work on it, including the original developers. Going off and
>>> doing development somewhere else just isn't ok. Should I just delete
>>> this driver from the staging tree as you don't seem to want to work with
>>> the community at this point in time?
>>>
>>
>> Getting it out of -staging wasn't my intent. Community is the reason
>> that this project still exists.
>>
>>
>>>> This is updated much more frequently and has many more bug fixes over
>>>> the mainline. It will also be easier to fix bugs/add features much more
>>>> quickly in this repo rather than sending them to lkml which can take
>>>> long time.
>>>
>>> Yes, developing in your own sandbox can always be faster, but there is
>>> no feedback loop.
>>>
>>
>> I was finding it real hard to find time to properly discuss each patch
>> over LKML, so I thought of shifting focus to local project repository
>> and then later go through proper reviews.
>
> So, should I delete the version in staging, or are you going to send
> patches to sync it up with your development version?
>
Deleting it from staging would not help much. Much more helpful would
be to sync at least the mainline and linux-next version of the driver
so it's easier to develop against these kernel trees. Initially, I
thought -staging means that any reviewed change can quickly make it
to *both* linux-next and more importantly -staging in mainline. Working/
Testing against mainline is much smoother than against linux-next.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-06 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-09 17:26 [PATCH 00/10] zram: various improvements and cleanups Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] Replace ioctls with sysfs interface Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 18:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 18:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 3:06 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 3:06 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-31 23:06 ` Dave Hansen
2010-08-31 23:06 ` Dave Hansen
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] Remove need for explicit device initialization Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 18:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 18:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 3:38 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 3:38 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] Use percpu stats Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 18:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 18:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 4:34 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-10 4:34 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-11 16:39 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-11 16:39 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-11 17:18 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-11 17:18 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-30 16:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-30 16:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-31 20:31 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-31 20:31 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-31 21:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-31 21:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-31 21:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-31 21:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-31 21:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-31 21:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-01 20:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-01 20:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-01 20:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-01 20:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-02 0:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-02 0:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-31 5:36 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-08-31 5:36 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-01 3:41 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-01 3:41 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-01 3:51 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-01 3:51 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-17 20:59 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-17 20:59 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] Use percpu buffers Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 18:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 18:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 4:47 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 4:47 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 5:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 5:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 5:32 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 5:32 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 7:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 7:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 05/10] Reduce per table entry overhead by 4 bytes Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 18:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 18:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 4:55 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 4:55 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 06/10] Block discard support Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 19:03 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 19:03 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-10 2:23 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-10 2:23 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-10 2:23 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-10 4:54 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 4:54 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 4:54 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-10 15:54 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-10 15:54 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-10 15:54 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 07/10] Increase compressed page size threshold Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 18:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 18:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 08/10] Some cleanups Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 19:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 19:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 09/10] Update zram documentation Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 10/10] Document sysfs entries Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 17:26 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-08-09 19:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-09 19:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-31 22:37 ` [PATCH 00/10] zram: various improvements and cleanups Greg KH
2010-08-31 22:37 ` Greg KH
2010-09-01 3:32 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-01 3:32 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-09-09 17:24 ` OOM panics with zram Dave Hansen
2010-09-09 17:24 ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-09 19:07 ` [patch -rc] oom: always return a badness score of non-zero for eligible tasks David Rientjes
2010-09-09 19:07 ` David Rientjes
2010-09-09 19:48 ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-09 19:48 ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-09 21:00 ` David Rientjes
2010-09-09 21:00 ` David Rientjes
2010-09-09 21:10 ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-09 21:10 ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-09 21:40 ` David Rientjes
2010-09-09 21:40 ` David Rientjes
2010-10-03 18:41 ` OOM panics with zram Nitin Gupta
2010-10-03 18:41 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-03 19:27 ` Dave Hansen
2010-10-03 19:27 ` Dave Hansen
2010-10-03 19:40 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-03 19:40 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-04 11:08 ` Ed Tomlinson
2010-10-04 11:08 ` Ed Tomlinson
2010-10-05 23:43 ` Greg KH
2010-10-05 23:43 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 2:29 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-06 2:29 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-06 2:36 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 2:36 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 4:30 ` Nitin Gupta [this message]
2010-10-06 4:30 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-06 7:38 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-06 7:38 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-06 14:03 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 14:03 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 14:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-06 14:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-06 14:53 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-06 14:53 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-10-06 14:02 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 14:02 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CABFB6F.2070800@vflare.org \
--to=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.