From: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Rick Bronson <rick@efn.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RS485: ioctls defined twice ?
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:22:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C67F815.8020808@evidence.eu.com> (raw)
Hi all,
is there any reason why ioctls TIOCGRS485 and TIOCSRS485 are defined (with the same values) in both include/asm-generic/ioctls.h and arch/arm/include/asm/ioctls.h ?
The same happens also for avr32, powerpc and cris (which, however, defines a different value for TIOCSRS485).
Is it duplicated code ?
Or should these values stay in both asm/ioctls.h and asm-generic/ioctls.h ?
Many thanks,
Claudio
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: claudio@evidence.eu.com (Claudio Scordino)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RS485: ioctls defined twice ?
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:22:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C67F815.8020808@evidence.eu.com> (raw)
Hi all,
is there any reason why ioctls TIOCGRS485 and TIOCSRS485 are defined (with the same values) in both include/asm-generic/ioctls.h and arch/arm/include/asm/ioctls.h ?
The same happens also for avr32, powerpc and cris (which, however, defines a different value for TIOCSRS485).
Is it duplicated code ?
Or should these values stay in both asm/ioctls.h and asm-generic/ioctls.h ?
Many thanks,
Claudio
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Rick Bronson <rick@efn.org>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RS485: ioctls defined twice ?
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:22:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C67F815.8020808@evidence.eu.com> (raw)
Hi all,
is there any reason why ioctls TIOCGRS485 and TIOCSRS485 are defined (with the same values) in both include/asm-generic/ioctls.h and arch/arm/include/asm/ioctls.h ?
The same happens also for avr32, powerpc and cris (which, however, defines a different value for TIOCSRS485).
Is it duplicated code ?
Or should these values stay in both asm/ioctls.h and asm-generic/ioctls.h ?
Many thanks,
Claudio
next reply other threads:[~2010-08-15 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-15 14:22 Claudio Scordino [this message]
2010-08-15 14:22 ` RS485: ioctls defined twice ? Claudio Scordino
2010-08-15 14:22 ` Claudio Scordino
2010-08-15 15:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-15 15:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C67F815.8020808@evidence.eu.com \
--to=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=rick@efn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.