[fsck.reiser4 --fix] segfaults and reports that it fixed problem (but it doesn't)

[fsck.reiser4 --fix] segfaults and reports that it fixed problem (but it doesn't)

[zic422]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 179 bytes --]

Check was perfomed from Debian Squeeze.
Even if I explicitly write -o
create=ccreg40,compress=lzo1,cluster=4K,compressMode=ultim the only
difference is that there is no segfault.

[-- Attachment #2: logs.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2633 bytes --]

user@debian:~$ su
Password: 
root@debian:/home/user# fsck.reiser4 --fix /dev/sda2
*******************************************************************
This is an EXPERIMENTAL version of fsck.reiser4. Read README first.
*******************************************************************

Fscking the /dev/sda2 block device.                                                                                          
Will fix minor corruptions of the Reiser4 SuperBlock.                                                                        
Will fix minor corruptions of the Reiser4 FileSystem.                                                                        
Continue?                                                                                                                    
(Yes/No): Y
***** fsck.reiser4 started at Sat Aug 21 12:54:11 2010
Reiser4 fs was detected on /dev/sda2.                                                                                        
Master super block (16): 
magic:		ReIsEr4 
blksize:	4096 
format:		0x0 (format40) 
uuid:		970f9e8b-5e34-4052-945c-c245235668f7 
label:		<none> 
 
Format super block (17): 
plugin:		format40 
description:	Disk-format plugin. 
version:	0 
magic:		ReIsEr40FoRmAt 
mkfs id:	0x17d2a916 
flushes:	0 
blocks:		2621440 
free blocks:	1696203 
root block:	2285025 
tail policy:	0x2 (smart) 
next oid:	0x34b539 
file count:	313544 
tree height:	5 
key policy:	LARGE 
 
 
CHECKING THE STORAGE TREE                                                                                                    
        Read nodes 925124                                                                                                    
	Nodes left in the tree 925124 
		Leaves of them 913586, Twigs of them 11302 
	Time interval: Sat Aug 21 12:54:13 2010 - Sat Aug 21 12:57:18 2010 
CHECKING EXTENT REGIONS.                                                                                                     
        Read twigs 11302                                                                                                     
	Time interval: Sat Aug 21 12:57:18 2010 - Sat Aug 21 12:58:25 2010 
CHECKING THE SEMANTIC TREE                                                                                                   
FSCK: /build/buildd-reiser4progs_1.0.7-6-i386-x3Vc4F/reiser4progs-1.0.7/plugin/object/ccreg40/ccreg40_repair.c: 77:          
ccreg40_check_item: The file [18dac:2e626173685f68:49ca3] (ccreg40), node [62428], item [9]: item of the wrong cluster size 
(-2147483648) found, Should be (4096). Fixed. 
Segmentation fault
root@debian:/home/user# 

Re: [fsck.reiser4 --fix] segfaults and reports that it fixed problem (but it doesn't)

[Edward Shishkin]

zic422@gmail.com wrote:
> Check was perfomed from Debian Squeeze.
> Even if I explicitly write -o
> create=ccreg40,compress=lzo1,cluster=4K,compressMode=ultim the only
> difference is that there is no segfault.
>   

Please, make sure you have the following patch applied:
http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&m=127504471326353&w=2

Thanks,
Edward.

Re: [fsck.reiser4 --fix] segfaults and reports that it fixed problem (but it doesn't)

[zic422]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 651 bytes --]

Problem solved. Thanks. Log is in attachment.

On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Edward Shishkin
<edward.shishkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> zic422@gmail.com wrote:
>> Check was perfomed from Debian Squeeze.
>> Even if I explicitly write -o
>> create=ccreg40,compress=lzo1,cluster=4K,compressMode=ultim the only
>> difference is that there is no segfault.
>>
>
> Please, make sure you have the following patch applied:
> http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&m=127504471326353&w=2
>
> Thanks,
> Edward.
>
>



-- 
                                                                  spuǝ
buıɥʇʎɹǝʌǝ

[-- Attachment #2: log-2010-08-21.txt.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/x-bzip2, Size: 1995 bytes --]

Re: [fsck.reiser4 --fix] segfaults and reports that it fixed problem (but it doesn't)

[Edward Shishkin]

zic422@gmail.com wrote:
> Check was perfomed from Debian Squeeze.
> Even if I explicitly write -o
> create=ccreg40,compress=lzo1,cluster=4K

Why do you need so small clusters?
Frankly, I don't know any patten, where
things with 4K clusters go better...

> ,compressMode=ultim the only
> difference is that there is no segfault.
>   

Re: [fsck.reiser4 --fix] segfaults and reports that it fixed problem (but it doesn't)

[Mat]

Hi Edward,

using Reiser4 for storing the portage-tree of Gentoo Linux would be
one of those use cases:

the raw tree has around 140,000 of a few kiB big files.

Mat

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Edward Shishkin
<edward.shishkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> zic422@gmail.com wrote:
>> Check was perfomed from Debian Squeeze.
>> Even if I explicitly write -o
>> create=ccreg40,compress=lzo1,cluster=4K
>
> Why do you need so small clusters?
> Frankly, I don't know any patten, where
> things with 4K clusters go better...
>
>> ,compressMode=ultim the only
>> difference is that there is no segfault.
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html