From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
kexec <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:36:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7A5455.7060905@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <779893521.1479771283083393771.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Hello,
On 08/29/2010 02:03 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
>
> ----- "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> On 08/29/2010 01:56 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
>>> It is easy to reproduce by passing maxcpus=1 to the first kernel.
>>
>> Do you mean booting w/ maxcpus=1 hangs the first kernel even w/o
>> kdump?
> Yes, here was the log,
Hmmm... I can't reproduce it here. I wonder what the difference is.
Can you please trigger sysrq-t after the boot is hung and post the
result?
Thanks.
--
tejun
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: CAI Qian <caiqian-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kexec <kexec-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:36:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7A5455.7060905@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <779893521.1479771283083393771.JavaMail.root-k5qu2F3t005+R5eDjrG6zsCp5Q1pQRjfhaY/URYTgi6ny3qCrzbmXA@public.gmane.org>
Hello,
On 08/29/2010 02:03 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
>
> ----- "Tejun Heo" <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> On 08/29/2010 01:56 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
>>> It is easy to reproduce by passing maxcpus=1 to the first kernel.
>>
>> Do you mean booting w/ maxcpus=1 hangs the first kernel even w/o
>> kdump?
> Yes, here was the log,
Hmmm... I can't reproduce it here. I wonder what the difference is.
Can you please trigger sysrq-t after the boot is hung and post the
result?
Thanks.
--
tejun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:36:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7A5455.7060905@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <779893521.1479771283083393771.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Hello,
On 08/29/2010 02:03 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
>
> ----- "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> On 08/29/2010 01:56 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
>>> It is easy to reproduce by passing maxcpus=1 to the first kernel.
>>
>> Do you mean booting w/ maxcpus=1 hangs the first kernel even w/o
>> kdump?
> Yes, here was the log,
Hmmm... I can't reproduce it here. I wonder what the difference is.
Can you please trigger sysrq-t after the boot is hung and post the
result?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-29 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <123671462.1479561283081998014.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-08-29 11:41 ` kdump regression compared to v2.6.35 caiqian
2010-08-29 11:41 ` caiqian
2010-08-29 11:41 ` caiqian-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
2010-08-29 11:56 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 11:56 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 11:56 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 11:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 11:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 11:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 12:03 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 12:03 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 12:36 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-08-29 12:36 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 12:36 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 3:42 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 3:42 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 8:29 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 8:29 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 8:29 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 10:24 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 10:24 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 12:50 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 12:50 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 12:50 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 14:02 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:02 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:21 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 14:21 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 14:21 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 14:47 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:47 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:51 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:51 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:51 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:55 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 14:55 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 14:55 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] <71887879.1606161283215975799.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-08-31 0:53 ` caiqian
2010-08-31 0:53 ` caiqian
2010-08-31 9:22 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-31 9:22 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-31 9:22 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] <373987879.1541191283181021800.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-08-30 15:10 ` caiqian
2010-08-30 15:10 ` caiqian
2010-08-30 16:38 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 16:38 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 16:38 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 17:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 17:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 17:31 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] <2142316909.1477341283065016062.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-08-29 7:01 ` caiqian
2010-08-29 7:01 ` caiqian
2010-08-29 7:01 ` caiqian-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
2010-08-29 8:57 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 8:57 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 8:57 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 11:24 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 11:24 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 11:24 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 11:21 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 11:21 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 11:21 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] <229468156.1475641283020469212.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-08-28 18:36 ` caiqian
2010-08-28 18:36 ` caiqian
2010-08-28 18:36 ` caiqian-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
[not found] <2082161789.1474781283008521258.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-08-28 15:19 ` caiqian
2010-08-28 15:19 ` caiqian
2010-08-27 12:35 CAI Qian
2010-08-27 12:35 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-27 12:35 ` CAI Qian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C7A5455.7060905@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.