From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: caiqian@redhat.com
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
kexec <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:31:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7BEB00.9060801@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C7BDE6E.8030107@kernel.org>
Please try this one instead. Thanks.
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index a2dccfc..75cdbc2 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1224,6 +1224,8 @@ __acquires(&gcwq->lock)
{
struct global_cwq *gcwq = worker->gcwq;
struct task_struct *task = worker->task;
+ static unsigned int cnt;
+ int rc;
while (true) {
/*
@@ -1232,8 +1234,11 @@ __acquires(&gcwq->lock)
* it races with cpu hotunplug operation. Verify
* against GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED.
*/
- if (!(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED))
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, get_cpu_mask(gcwq->cpu));
+ if (!(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED)) {
+ rc = set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, get_cpu_mask(gcwq->cpu));
+ if (rc && ++cnt < 10)
+ printk("XXX set_cpus_allowed_ptr() failed w/ %d\n", rc);
+ }
spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
if (gcwq->flags & GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED)
@@ -1985,13 +1990,16 @@ repeat:
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(tcpu, wq);
struct global_cwq *gcwq = cwq->gcwq;
struct work_struct *work, *n;
+ bool bound;
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
mayday_clear_cpu(cpu, wq->mayday_mask);
/* migrate to the target cpu if possible */
rescuer->gcwq = gcwq;
- worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(rescuer);
+ printk("XXX %s: rescuer dispatching to cpu%u\n", wq->name, gcwq->cpu);
+ bound = worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(rescuer);
+ printk("XXX %s: rescuer done binding, bound=%d\n", wq->name, bound);
/*
* Slurp in all works issued via this workqueue and
@@ -3558,8 +3566,7 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
spin_lock_init(&gcwq->lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gcwq->worklist);
gcwq->cpu = cpu;
- if (cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
- gcwq->flags |= GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
+ gcwq->flags |= GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gcwq->idle_list);
for (i = 0; i < BUSY_WORKER_HASH_SIZE; i++)
@@ -3583,6 +3590,8 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
struct worker *worker;
+ if (cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
+ gcwq->flags &= ~GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
worker = create_worker(gcwq, true);
BUG_ON(!worker);
spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: caiqian-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Cc: torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kexec <kexec-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:31:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7BEB00.9060801@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C7BDE6E.8030107-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Please try this one instead. Thanks.
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index a2dccfc..75cdbc2 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1224,6 +1224,8 @@ __acquires(&gcwq->lock)
{
struct global_cwq *gcwq = worker->gcwq;
struct task_struct *task = worker->task;
+ static unsigned int cnt;
+ int rc;
while (true) {
/*
@@ -1232,8 +1234,11 @@ __acquires(&gcwq->lock)
* it races with cpu hotunplug operation. Verify
* against GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED.
*/
- if (!(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED))
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, get_cpu_mask(gcwq->cpu));
+ if (!(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED)) {
+ rc = set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, get_cpu_mask(gcwq->cpu));
+ if (rc && ++cnt < 10)
+ printk("XXX set_cpus_allowed_ptr() failed w/ %d\n", rc);
+ }
spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
if (gcwq->flags & GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED)
@@ -1985,13 +1990,16 @@ repeat:
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(tcpu, wq);
struct global_cwq *gcwq = cwq->gcwq;
struct work_struct *work, *n;
+ bool bound;
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
mayday_clear_cpu(cpu, wq->mayday_mask);
/* migrate to the target cpu if possible */
rescuer->gcwq = gcwq;
- worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(rescuer);
+ printk("XXX %s: rescuer dispatching to cpu%u\n", wq->name, gcwq->cpu);
+ bound = worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(rescuer);
+ printk("XXX %s: rescuer done binding, bound=%d\n", wq->name, bound);
/*
* Slurp in all works issued via this workqueue and
@@ -3558,8 +3566,7 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
spin_lock_init(&gcwq->lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gcwq->worklist);
gcwq->cpu = cpu;
- if (cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
- gcwq->flags |= GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
+ gcwq->flags |= GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gcwq->idle_list);
for (i = 0; i < BUSY_WORKER_HASH_SIZE; i++)
@@ -3583,6 +3590,8 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
struct worker *worker;
+ if (cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
+ gcwq->flags &= ~GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
worker = create_worker(gcwq, true);
BUG_ON(!worker);
spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: caiqian@redhat.com
Cc: kexec <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:31:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7BEB00.9060801@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C7BDE6E.8030107@kernel.org>
Please try this one instead. Thanks.
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index a2dccfc..75cdbc2 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1224,6 +1224,8 @@ __acquires(&gcwq->lock)
{
struct global_cwq *gcwq = worker->gcwq;
struct task_struct *task = worker->task;
+ static unsigned int cnt;
+ int rc;
while (true) {
/*
@@ -1232,8 +1234,11 @@ __acquires(&gcwq->lock)
* it races with cpu hotunplug operation. Verify
* against GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED.
*/
- if (!(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED))
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, get_cpu_mask(gcwq->cpu));
+ if (!(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED)) {
+ rc = set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, get_cpu_mask(gcwq->cpu));
+ if (rc && ++cnt < 10)
+ printk("XXX set_cpus_allowed_ptr() failed w/ %d\n", rc);
+ }
spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
if (gcwq->flags & GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED)
@@ -1985,13 +1990,16 @@ repeat:
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(tcpu, wq);
struct global_cwq *gcwq = cwq->gcwq;
struct work_struct *work, *n;
+ bool bound;
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
mayday_clear_cpu(cpu, wq->mayday_mask);
/* migrate to the target cpu if possible */
rescuer->gcwq = gcwq;
- worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(rescuer);
+ printk("XXX %s: rescuer dispatching to cpu%u\n", wq->name, gcwq->cpu);
+ bound = worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(rescuer);
+ printk("XXX %s: rescuer done binding, bound=%d\n", wq->name, bound);
/*
* Slurp in all works issued via this workqueue and
@@ -3558,8 +3566,7 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
spin_lock_init(&gcwq->lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gcwq->worklist);
gcwq->cpu = cpu;
- if (cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
- gcwq->flags |= GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
+ gcwq->flags |= GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gcwq->idle_list);
for (i = 0; i < BUSY_WORKER_HASH_SIZE; i++)
@@ -3583,6 +3590,8 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
struct worker *worker;
+ if (cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
+ gcwq->flags &= ~GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
worker = create_worker(gcwq, true);
BUG_ON(!worker);
spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-30 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <373987879.1541191283181021800.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-08-30 15:10 ` kdump regression compared to v2.6.35 caiqian
2010-08-30 15:10 ` caiqian
2010-08-30 16:38 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 16:38 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 16:38 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 17:31 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-08-30 17:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 17:31 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] <71887879.1606161283215975799.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-08-31 0:53 ` caiqian
2010-08-31 0:53 ` caiqian
2010-08-31 9:22 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-31 9:22 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-31 9:22 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] <123671462.1479561283081998014.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-08-29 11:41 ` caiqian
2010-08-29 11:41 ` caiqian
2010-08-29 11:41 ` caiqian-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
2010-08-29 11:56 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 11:56 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 11:56 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 11:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 11:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 11:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 12:03 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 12:03 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 12:36 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 12:36 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 12:36 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 3:42 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 3:42 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 8:29 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 8:29 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 8:29 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 10:24 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 10:24 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 12:50 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 12:50 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 12:50 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 14:02 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:02 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:21 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 14:21 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 14:21 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 14:47 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:47 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:51 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:51 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:51 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-30 14:55 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 14:55 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 14:55 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] <2142316909.1477341283065016062.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-08-29 7:01 ` caiqian
2010-08-29 7:01 ` caiqian
2010-08-29 7:01 ` caiqian-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
2010-08-29 8:57 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 8:57 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 8:57 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 11:24 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 11:24 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 11:24 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-29 11:21 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 11:21 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-29 11:21 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] <229468156.1475641283020469212.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-08-28 18:36 ` caiqian
2010-08-28 18:36 ` caiqian
2010-08-28 18:36 ` caiqian-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
[not found] <2082161789.1474781283008521258.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-08-28 15:19 ` caiqian
2010-08-28 15:19 ` caiqian
2010-08-27 12:35 CAI Qian
2010-08-27 12:35 ` CAI Qian
2010-08-27 12:35 ` CAI Qian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C7BEB00.9060801@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.