* [nfs] nfs: Fix nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6
@ 2010-09-03 16:15 Ben Greear
2010-09-03 16:17 ` Chuck Lever
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Greear @ 2010-09-03 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nfs; +Cc: Ben Greear
A typo caused this method not not actually compare the
two addresses passed in. It returned true in almost all
cases instead.
Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
---
:100644 100644 4e7df2a... e734072... M fs/nfs/client.c
fs/nfs/client.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/client.c b/fs/nfs/client.c
index 4e7df2a..e734072 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/client.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/client.c
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6(const struct sockaddr *sa1,
sin1->sin6_scope_id != sin2->sin6_scope_id)
return 0;
- return ipv6_addr_equal(&sin1->sin6_addr, &sin1->sin6_addr);
+ return ipv6_addr_equal(&sin1->sin6_addr, &sin2->sin6_addr);
}
#else /* !defined(CONFIG_IPV6) && !defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE) */
static int nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6(const struct sockaddr *sa1,
--
1.6.2.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [nfs] nfs: Fix nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6
2010-09-03 16:15 [nfs] nfs: Fix nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6 Ben Greear
@ 2010-09-03 16:17 ` Chuck Lever
2010-09-03 16:22 ` Ben Greear
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever @ 2010-09-03 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Greear; +Cc: linux-nfs
On Sep 3, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> A typo caused this method not not actually compare the
> two addresses passed in. It returned true in almost all
> cases instead.
>From the perspective of the local logic, that looks correct. Have you tried this with IPv6 mounts? Notice any overall changes in behavior?
> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> ---
> :100644 100644 4e7df2a... e734072... M fs/nfs/client.c
> fs/nfs/client.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/client.c b/fs/nfs/client.c
> index 4e7df2a..e734072 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/client.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/client.c
> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6(const struct sockaddr *sa1,
> sin1->sin6_scope_id != sin2->sin6_scope_id)
> return 0;
>
> - return ipv6_addr_equal(&sin1->sin6_addr, &sin1->sin6_addr);
> + return ipv6_addr_equal(&sin1->sin6_addr, &sin2->sin6_addr);
> }
> #else /* !defined(CONFIG_IPV6) && !defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE) */
> static int nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6(const struct sockaddr *sa1,
> --
> 1.6.2.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [nfs] nfs: Fix nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6
2010-09-03 16:17 ` Chuck Lever
@ 2010-09-03 16:22 ` Ben Greear
2010-09-03 16:27 ` Chuck Lever
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Greear @ 2010-09-03 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Lever; +Cc: linux-nfs
On 09/03/2010 09:17 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> On Sep 3, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>> A typo caused this method not not actually compare the
>> two addresses passed in. It returned true in almost all
>> cases instead.
>
> From the perspective of the local logic, that looks correct. Have you tried this with IPv6 mounts? Notice any overall changes in behavior?
I noticed this when getting multiple NFS mounts to work with srcaddr=
The change fixed the problems I was seeing, but I haven't tested w/out
srcaddr= logic. Might need to have two different NFS servers to do a good
test of this logic, and I'm not looking forward to setting up another
open-solaris box!
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [nfs] nfs: Fix nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6
2010-09-03 16:22 ` Ben Greear
@ 2010-09-03 16:27 ` Chuck Lever
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever @ 2010-09-03 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Greear, Trond Myklebust; +Cc: linux-nfs
On Sep 3, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 09/03/2010 09:17 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 3, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>
>>> A typo caused this method not not actually compare the
>>> two addresses passed in. It returned true in almost all
>>> cases instead.
>>
>> From the perspective of the local logic, that looks correct. Have you tried this with IPv6 mounts? Notice any overall changes in behavior?
>
> I noticed this when getting multiple NFS mounts to work with srcaddr=
>
> The change fixed the problems I was seeing, but I haven't tested w/out
> srcaddr= logic. Might need to have two different NFS servers to do a good
> test of this logic, and I'm not looking forward to setting up another
> open-solaris box!
OK, so at least it doesn't seem to break anything. :^)
Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
--
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-03 16:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-03 16:15 [nfs] nfs: Fix nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6 Ben Greear
2010-09-03 16:17 ` Chuck Lever
2010-09-03 16:22 ` Ben Greear
2010-09-03 16:27 ` Chuck Lever
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.