All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] ath9k, multiple stations, and AMPDUs
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:10:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C98848C.70005@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C9841BA.4080700@candelatech.com>

On 2010-09-21 7:25 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> I think I have narrowed down some problems I see when I create
> two STA interfaces on the same radio and associate with the
> same AP.
> 
> I'm using wireless-testing plus some patches to the rx logic
> I posted earlier.
> 
> It appears that the ath9k NIC does not transport AMPDUs properly,
> and after a few seconds, it's backlog is exhausted and the queues
> are stopped in ath_tx_start.
ath9k currently looks up the sta by hw and not by vif on tx completion.
That completely breaks aggregation in such a setup. Unfortunately I
don't know an easy way to fix this yet.

This will be fixed by my sw aggregation rewrite, but I don't know when
I'll get that completed yet.

- Felix

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k, multiple stations, and AMPDUs
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:10:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C98848C.70005@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C9841BA.4080700@candelatech.com>

On 2010-09-21 7:25 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> I think I have narrowed down some problems I see when I create
> two STA interfaces on the same radio and associate with the
> same AP.
> 
> I'm using wireless-testing plus some patches to the rx logic
> I posted earlier.
> 
> It appears that the ath9k NIC does not transport AMPDUs properly,
> and after a few seconds, it's backlog is exhausted and the queues
> are stopped in ath_tx_start.
ath9k currently looks up the sta by hw and not by vif on tx completion.
That completely breaks aggregation in such a setup. Unfortunately I
don't know an easy way to fix this yet.

This will be fixed by my sw aggregation rewrite, but I don't know when
I'll get that completed yet.

- Felix

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-21 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-21  5:25 [ath9k-devel] ath9k, multiple stations, and AMPDUs Ben Greear
2010-09-21  5:25 ` Ben Greear
2010-09-21 10:10 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2010-09-21 10:10   ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 12:08   ` Ben Greear
2010-09-21 12:08     ` Ben Greear
2010-09-21 12:19     ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 12:19       ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 12:24       ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-21 12:24         ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-21 12:31       ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-21 12:31         ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-21 17:25       ` Ben Greear
2010-09-21 17:25         ` Ben Greear
2010-09-21 18:00         ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 18:00           ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 18:04           ` Ben Greear
2010-09-21 18:04             ` Ben Greear
2010-09-21 18:06             ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 18:06               ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 19:28           ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-21 19:28             ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-21 19:32             ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 19:32               ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 20:19               ` Ben Greear
2010-09-21 20:19                 ` Ben Greear
2010-09-21 22:41                 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 22:41                   ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-22  4:33                   ` Ben Greear
2010-09-22  4:33                     ` Ben Greear
2010-09-22  8:31                     ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-22  8:31                       ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-23  4:58                       ` Ben Greear
2010-09-23  4:58                         ` Ben Greear
2010-09-23  8:33                         ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-23  8:33                           ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-23 13:56                           ` Ben Greear
2010-09-23 13:56                             ` Ben Greear
2010-09-23 14:05                             ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-23 14:05                               ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C98848C.70005@openwrt.org \
    --to=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.