From: bzzz.tomas at gmail.com <bzzz.tomas@gmail.com>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [Lustre-devel] Queries regarding LDLM_ENQUEUE
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:18:59 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CBF2483.7030805@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CBF22DE.9080204@psc.edu>
On 10/20/10 9:11 PM, Paul Nowoczynski wrote:
> I could be wrong but my guess is that the network congestion caused by
> this communication pattern is a more serious problem. The mds should be
> able to easily service lookup rpc's since only the first few necessitate
> a read I/O from the disk.
but then the network should be able to deal with storm of
<max RPC in-flight> * <# clients> to read/write data?
or it's a specific switch being the bottleneck to specific node?
because if it isn't network, but MDS being a real bottleneck,
then proxy might be a solution like Eric said above. not sure
is this important in your case, but this would allow to use
existing apps.
of course, distribution tree for a handle may scale better.
thanks, z
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-20 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-18 23:33 [Lustre-devel] Queries regarding LDLM_ENQUEUE Vilobh Meshram
2010-10-19 15:46 ` Fan Yong
2010-10-19 20:28 ` Vilobh Meshram
2010-10-19 22:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-20 2:04 ` Vilobh Meshram
2010-10-20 7:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-20 8:11 ` bzzz.tomas at gmail.com
2010-10-20 8:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-20 8:30 ` bzzz.tomas at gmail.com
2010-10-20 8:38 ` Nikita Danilov
2010-10-20 14:45 ` Nicolas Williams
2010-10-20 13:30 ` Eric Barton
2010-10-20 13:40 ` bzzz.tomas at gmail.com
2010-10-20 14:51 ` Paul Nowoczynski
2010-10-20 14:55 ` Nicolas Williams
2010-10-20 15:16 ` Paul Nowoczynski
2010-10-20 16:07 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-20 15:22 ` bzzz.tomas at gmail.com
2010-10-20 16:43 ` Paul Nowoczynski
2010-10-20 16:49 ` bzzz.tomas at gmail.com
2010-10-20 17:11 ` Paul Nowoczynski
2010-10-20 17:18 ` bzzz.tomas at gmail.com [this message]
2010-10-20 17:25 ` Paul Nowoczynski
2010-10-20 17:27 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-20 17:29 ` Nicolas Williams
2010-10-20 17:40 ` bzzz.tomas at gmail.com
2010-10-20 18:01 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-20 18:09 ` bzzz.tomas at gmail.com
2010-10-20 16:35 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-20 16:46 ` Paul Nowoczynski
2010-10-20 17:00 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-20 17:13 ` Nicolas Williams
2010-10-20 17:30 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-20 17:01 ` Nicolas Williams
2010-10-22 2:33 ` Vilobh Meshram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CBF2483.7030805@gmail.com \
--to=bzzz.tomas@gmail.com \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.