From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] b43: rfkill: use status register based on core revision not (PHY's)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:39:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC57A82.7030300@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287779045-20257-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
On 10/22/2010 03:24 PM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
> ---
> This makes my N-PHY radio at least running (no scanning results so far). The
> same register is used by wl on this device.
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c
> index 78016ae..d2734c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> /* Returns TRUE, if the radio is enabled in hardware. */
> bool b43_is_hw_radio_enabled(struct b43_wldev *dev)
> {
> - if (dev->phy.rev >= 3 || dev->phy.type == B43_PHYTYPE_LP) {
> + if (dev->dev->id.revision >= 3) {
> if (!(b43_read32(dev, B43_MMIO_RADIO_HWENABLED_HI)
> & B43_MMIO_RADIO_HWENABLED_HI_MASK))
> return 1;
Over the weekend, I was able to test this patch using all my b43 hardware. There
were no problems.
Despite having no problems, I still NACK the patch for the reason that b43 only
applies to devices with id.revision >= 5, thus the revised "if" will always be
true. The patch should be rewritten as only b43legacy needs to test the 802.11
core revision.
Larry
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43: rfkill: use status register based on core revision not (PHY's)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:39:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC57A82.7030300@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287779045-20257-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
On 10/22/2010 03:24 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
> ---
> This makes my N-PHY radio at least running (no scanning results so far). The
> same register is used by wl on this device.
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c
> index 78016ae..d2734c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> /* Returns TRUE, if the radio is enabled in hardware. */
> bool b43_is_hw_radio_enabled(struct b43_wldev *dev)
> {
> - if (dev->phy.rev >= 3 || dev->phy.type == B43_PHYTYPE_LP) {
> + if (dev->dev->id.revision >= 3) {
> if (!(b43_read32(dev, B43_MMIO_RADIO_HWENABLED_HI)
> & B43_MMIO_RADIO_HWENABLED_HI_MASK))
> return 1;
Over the weekend, I was able to test this patch using all my b43 hardware. There
were no problems.
Despite having no problems, I still NACK the patch for the reason that b43 only
applies to devices with id.revision >= 5, thus the revised "if" will always be
true. The patch should be rewritten as only b43legacy needs to test the 802.11
core revision.
Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-25 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-22 20:24 [PATCH] b43: rfkill: use status register based on core revision not (PHY's) Rafał Miłecki
2010-10-22 20:24 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-10-22 20:25 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-10-22 20:25 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-10-22 21:38 ` Larry Finger
2010-10-22 21:38 ` Larry Finger
2010-10-22 21:57 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-10-22 21:57 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-10-22 22:31 ` Larry Finger
2010-10-22 22:31 ` Larry Finger
2010-10-25 12:39 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2010-10-25 12:39 ` Larry Finger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC57A82.7030300@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.