* [PATCH] tar: upgrade to version 1.25 @ 2010-11-18 2:13 Scott Garman 2010-11-18 2:18 ` Philip Balister 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Scott Garman @ 2010-11-18 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel; +Cc: Scott Garman Signed-off-by: Scott Garman <sgarman@zenlinux.com> --- recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb | 6 ------ recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb create mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb deleted file mode 100644 index dc37247..0000000 --- a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb +++ /dev/null @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ -require tar.inc - -PR = "${INC_PR}" - -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "41e2ca4b924ec7860e51b43ad06cdb7e" -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "c9328372db62fbb1d94c9e4e3cefc961111af46de47085b635359c00a0eebe36" diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c611f77 --- /dev/null +++ b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +require tar.inc + +PR = "${INC_PR}" + +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "6e497f861c77bbba2f7da4e10270995b" +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "f3f6ce41b8e0f327abd05c95990f113ddafbae131e10f79a99728ed46458494b" -- 1.7.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tar: upgrade to version 1.25 2010-11-18 2:13 [PATCH] tar: upgrade to version 1.25 Scott Garman @ 2010-11-18 2:18 ` Philip Balister 2010-11-18 2:48 ` Scott Garman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Philip Balister @ 2010-11-18 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel On 11/17/2010 06:13 PM, Scott Garman wrote: > Signed-off-by: Scott Garman<sgarman@zenlinux.com> > --- > recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb | 6 ------ > recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb | 6 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb > create mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb > > diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb > deleted file mode 100644 > index dc37247..0000000 > --- a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ > -require tar.inc > - > -PR = "${INC_PR}" > - > -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "41e2ca4b924ec7860e51b43ad06cdb7e" > -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "c9328372db62fbb1d94c9e4e3cefc961111af46de47085b635359c00a0eebe36" > diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..c611f77 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > +require tar.inc > + > +PR = "${INC_PR}" > + > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "6e497f861c77bbba2f7da4e10270995b" > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "f3f6ce41b8e0f327abd05c95990f113ddafbae131e10f79a99728ed46458494b" Acked-by: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> Can you add tar-1.23 to the removal.txt file? Ask it be removed in a couple of months. This way we have a schedule to delete the older recipe. Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tar: upgrade to version 1.25 2010-11-18 2:18 ` Philip Balister @ 2010-11-18 2:48 ` Scott Garman 2010-11-18 2:54 ` Philip Balister 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Scott Garman @ 2010-11-18 2:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel On 11/17/2010 06:18 PM, Philip Balister wrote: > On 11/17/2010 06:13 PM, Scott Garman wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Scott Garman<sgarman@zenlinux.com> >> --- >> recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb | 6 ------ >> recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb | 6 ++++++ >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb >> create mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb >> >> diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb >> deleted file mode 100644 >> index dc37247..0000000 >> --- a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb >> +++ /dev/null >> @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ >> -require tar.inc >> - >> -PR = "${INC_PR}" >> - >> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "41e2ca4b924ec7860e51b43ad06cdb7e" >> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >> "c9328372db62fbb1d94c9e4e3cefc961111af46de47085b635359c00a0eebe36" >> diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..c611f77 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb >> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ >> +require tar.inc >> + >> +PR = "${INC_PR}" >> + >> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "6e497f861c77bbba2f7da4e10270995b" >> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >> "f3f6ce41b8e0f327abd05c95990f113ddafbae131e10f79a99728ed46458494b" > > > Acked-by: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> > > Can you add tar-1.23 to the removal.txt file? Ask it be removed in a > couple of months. This way we have a schedule to delete the older recipe. Thanks for the quick ack, Philip. Question though on the removal.txt addition - this patch deletes the v1.23 version already. Does it need to be kept around instead? I would think not given that this is a pretty trivial update. Perhaps you meant tar v1.18 and/or v1.20, which are still there? Scott ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tar: upgrade to version 1.25 2010-11-18 2:48 ` Scott Garman @ 2010-11-18 2:54 ` Philip Balister 2010-11-18 3:28 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Philip Balister @ 2010-11-18 2:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel On 11/17/2010 06:48 PM, Scott Garman wrote: > On 11/17/2010 06:18 PM, Philip Balister wrote: >> On 11/17/2010 06:13 PM, Scott Garman wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Scott Garman<sgarman@zenlinux.com> >>> --- >>> recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb | 6 ------ >>> recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb | 6 ++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> delete mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb >>> create mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb >>> >>> diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb >>> deleted file mode 100644 >>> index dc37247..0000000 >>> --- a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb >>> +++ /dev/null >>> @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ >>> -require tar.inc >>> - >>> -PR = "${INC_PR}" >>> - >>> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "41e2ca4b924ec7860e51b43ad06cdb7e" >>> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>> "c9328372db62fbb1d94c9e4e3cefc961111af46de47085b635359c00a0eebe36" >>> diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000..c611f77 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb >>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ >>> +require tar.inc >>> + >>> +PR = "${INC_PR}" >>> + >>> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "6e497f861c77bbba2f7da4e10270995b" >>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>> "f3f6ce41b8e0f327abd05c95990f113ddafbae131e10f79a99728ed46458494b" >> >> >> Acked-by: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> >> >> Can you add tar-1.23 to the removal.txt file? Ask it be removed in a >> couple of months. This way we have a schedule to delete the older recipe. > > Thanks for the quick ack, Philip. Question though on the removal.txt > addition - this patch deletes the v1.23 version already. Does it need to > be kept around instead? I would think not given that this is a pretty > trivial update. > > Perhaps you meant tar v1.18 and/or v1.20, which are still there? Oops, I wasn't paying that close attention. I'd still leave 1.23 around for a couple of months, just in case there is some weird issue with 1.25. We should check on the older ones and add them to removal.txt also. I'd like to see us get into a sane clean up old stuff cycle, instead of the delete everything at once approach. Of course checking to see if any in tree distros use them is good thing. Philip > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tar: upgrade to version 1.25 2010-11-18 2:54 ` Philip Balister @ 2010-11-18 3:28 ` Khem Raj 2010-11-18 8:34 ` Martin Jansa 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2010-11-18 3:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> wrote: > On 11/17/2010 06:48 PM, Scott Garman wrote: >> >> On 11/17/2010 06:18 PM, Philip Balister wrote: >>> >>> On 11/17/2010 06:13 PM, Scott Garman wrote: >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Garman<sgarman@zenlinux.com> >>>> --- >>>> recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb | 6 ------ >>>> recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb | 6 ++++++ >>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>>> delete mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb >>>> create mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb >>>> >>>> diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb >>>> deleted file mode 100644 >>>> index dc37247..0000000 >>>> --- a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb >>>> +++ /dev/null >>>> @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ >>>> -require tar.inc >>>> - >>>> -PR = "${INC_PR}" >>>> - >>>> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "41e2ca4b924ec7860e51b43ad06cdb7e" >>>> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>>> "c9328372db62fbb1d94c9e4e3cefc961111af46de47085b635359c00a0eebe36" >>>> diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 0000000..c611f77 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ >>>> +require tar.inc >>>> + >>>> +PR = "${INC_PR}" >>>> + >>>> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "6e497f861c77bbba2f7da4e10270995b" >>>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>>> "f3f6ce41b8e0f327abd05c95990f113ddafbae131e10f79a99728ed46458494b" >>> >>> >>> Acked-by: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> >>> >>> Can you add tar-1.23 to the removal.txt file? Ask it be removed in a >>> couple of months. This way we have a schedule to delete the older recipe. >> >> Thanks for the quick ack, Philip. Question though on the removal.txt >> addition - this patch deletes the v1.23 version already. Does it need to >> be kept around instead? I would think not given that this is a pretty >> trivial update. >> >> Perhaps you meant tar v1.18 and/or v1.20, which are still there? > > Oops, I wasn't paying that close attention. I'd still leave 1.23 around for > a couple of months, just in case there is some weird issue with 1.25. We > should check on the older ones and add them to removal.txt also. I'd like to > see us get into a sane clean up old stuff cycle, instead of the delete > everything at once approach. Of course checking to see if any in tree > distros use them is good thing. > Yeah probably a sane thing. Make 1.25 default and let 1.23 linger around for a while just in case. > Philip > >> >> Scott >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >> > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tar: upgrade to version 1.25 2010-11-18 3:28 ` Khem Raj @ 2010-11-18 8:34 ` Martin Jansa 2010-11-18 16:35 ` Scott Garman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Jansa @ 2010-11-18 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> wrote: >> On 11/17/2010 06:48 PM, Scott Garman wrote: >>> >>> On 11/17/2010 06:18 PM, Philip Balister wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/17/2010 06:13 PM, Scott Garman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Garman<sgarman@zenlinux.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb | 6 ------ >>>>> recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb | 6 ++++++ >>>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>>>> delete mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb >>>>> create mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb >>>>> deleted file mode 100644 >>>>> index dc37247..0000000 >>>>> --- a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb >>>>> +++ /dev/null >>>>> @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ >>>>> -require tar.inc >>>>> - >>>>> -PR = "${INC_PR}" >>>>> - >>>>> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "41e2ca4b924ec7860e51b43ad06cdb7e" >>>>> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>>>> "c9328372db62fbb1d94c9e4e3cefc961111af46de47085b635359c00a0eebe36" >>>>> diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb >>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>> index 0000000..c611f77 >>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>> +++ b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ >>>>> +require tar.inc >>>>> + >>>>> +PR = "${INC_PR}" >>>>> + >>>>> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "6e497f861c77bbba2f7da4e10270995b" >>>>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>>>> "f3f6ce41b8e0f327abd05c95990f113ddafbae131e10f79a99728ed46458494b" >>>> >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> >>>> >>>> Can you add tar-1.23 to the removal.txt file? Ask it be removed in a >>>> couple of months. This way we have a schedule to delete the older recipe. >>> >>> Thanks for the quick ack, Philip. Question though on the removal.txt >>> addition - this patch deletes the v1.23 version already. Does it need to >>> be kept around instead? I would think not given that this is a pretty >>> trivial update. >>> >>> Perhaps you meant tar v1.18 and/or v1.20, which are still there? >> >> Oops, I wasn't paying that close attention. I'd still leave 1.23 around for >> a couple of months, just in case there is some weird issue with 1.25. We >> should check on the older ones and add them to removal.txt also. I'd like to >> see us get into a sane clean up old stuff cycle, instead of the delete >> everything at once approach. Of course checking to see if any in tree >> distros use them is good thing. >> > > Yeah probably a sane thing. Make 1.25 default and let 1.23 linger > around for a while > just in case. Gentoo already has serious bug reported against 1.25 http://bugs.gentoo.org/342983 resulting in added 1.25 being masked now there Maybe we should keep 1.23 default until it's resolved or confirmed that OE is not affected by this. Regards, ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tar: upgrade to version 1.25 2010-11-18 8:34 ` Martin Jansa @ 2010-11-18 16:35 ` Scott Garman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Scott Garman @ 2010-11-18 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel On 11/18/2010 12:34 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>>>> Can you add tar-1.23 to the removal.txt file? Ask it be removed in a >>>>> couple of months. This way we have a schedule to delete the older recipe. >>>> >>>> Thanks for the quick ack, Philip. Question though on the removal.txt >>>> addition - this patch deletes the v1.23 version already. Does it need to >>>> be kept around instead? I would think not given that this is a pretty >>>> trivial update. >>>> >>>> Perhaps you meant tar v1.18 and/or v1.20, which are still there? >>> >>> Oops, I wasn't paying that close attention. I'd still leave 1.23 around for >>> a couple of months, just in case there is some weird issue with 1.25. We >>> should check on the older ones and add them to removal.txt also. I'd like to >>> see us get into a sane clean up old stuff cycle, instead of the delete >>> everything at once approach. Of course checking to see if any in tree >>> distros use them is good thing. >>> >> >> Yeah probably a sane thing. Make 1.25 default and let 1.23 linger >> around for a while >> just in case. > > Gentoo already has serious bug reported against 1.25 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/342983 > resulting in added 1.25 being masked now there > > Maybe we should keep 1.23 default until it's resolved or confirmed > that OE is not affected by this. Thanks Martin for that research. I'm going to remove my patch from patchwork and look into this further. If the bug against 1.25 doesn't look like it will affect us, I will re-submit the patch such that 1.23 is kept around. Otherwise we may be better off simply waiting for another release of tar. FWIW tar 1.25 came out only two weeks after 1.24, which implies to me that they were fixing some relatively urgent bugs. As mentioned on the tar home page, these issues were reportedly fixed in 1.25: * Fix extraction of empty directories with the -C option in effect * Fix extraction of device nodes * Make sure name matching occurs before eventual name transformation * Fix the behavior of tar -x --overwrite on hosts lacking O_NOFOLLOW. * Improve the testsuite I also maintain the tar recipe for Poky, so I'll investigate further. Scott -- Scott Garman sgarman at zenlinux dot com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-18 16:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-11-18 2:13 [PATCH] tar: upgrade to version 1.25 Scott Garman 2010-11-18 2:18 ` Philip Balister 2010-11-18 2:48 ` Scott Garman 2010-11-18 2:54 ` Philip Balister 2010-11-18 3:28 ` Khem Raj 2010-11-18 8:34 ` Martin Jansa 2010-11-18 16:35 ` Scott Garman
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.