All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bengt.g.jonsson@stericsson.com (Bengt Jonsson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: Added new regulator_data pointer to ab8500 board configuration
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:24:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CECCBAE.6080707@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101123183037.GA19212@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>

On 2010-11-23 19:30, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:25:52PM +0100, Bengt Jonsson wrote:
>
>> The ab8500 regulator board configuration will be better separated
>> from the MFD board configuration. This patch adds a void pointer
>> for this purpose.
>
> Adding something completely typesafe seems like a real loss - if you
> want to point to something else at least point to a particular type -
> eg,
>
> struct foo;
>
> struct pdata {
> 	int other_stuff;
> 	struct foo *foo;
> };
>
I get your point, I'll try this out.
>>   	struct regulator_init_data *regulator[AB8500_NUM_REGULATORS];
>> +	void *regulator_data;
>
> It'd also help if you could articulate the problem you see with the
> current approach...
The problem I see is that ab8500-core defines the number of regulators 
which I can see no reason for. If someone wants to add or remove a 
regulator they have to make a change in include/linux/mfd/ab8500.c as 
well as in the regulator files.

I will add a better description in an updated patch.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bengt Jonsson <bengt.g.jonsson@stericsson.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: Added new regulator_data pointer to ab8500 board configuration
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:24:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CECCBAE.6080707@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101123183037.GA19212@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>

On 2010-11-23 19:30, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:25:52PM +0100, Bengt Jonsson wrote:
>
>> The ab8500 regulator board configuration will be better separated
>> from the MFD board configuration. This patch adds a void pointer
>> for this purpose.
>
> Adding something completely typesafe seems like a real loss - if you
> want to point to something else at least point to a particular type -
> eg,
>
> struct foo;
>
> struct pdata {
> 	int other_stuff;
> 	struct foo *foo;
> };
>
I get your point, I'll try this out.
>>   	struct regulator_init_data *regulator[AB8500_NUM_REGULATORS];
>> +	void *regulator_data;
>
> It'd also help if you could articulate the problem you see with the
> current approach...
The problem I see is that ab8500-core defines the number of regulators 
which I can see no reason for. If someone wants to add or remove a 
regulator they have to make a change in include/linux/mfd/ab8500.c as 
well as in the regulator files.

I will add a better description in an updated patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-24  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-23 18:25 [PATCH 0/3] regulators: Update of ab8500 driver Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-23 18:25 ` Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd: Added new regulator_data pointer to ab8500 board configuration Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-23 18:25   ` Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-23 18:30   ` Mark Brown
2010-11-23 18:30     ` Mark Brown
2010-11-24  8:24     ` Bengt Jonsson [this message]
2010-11-24  8:24       ` Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-24 11:36       ` Mark Brown
2010-11-24 11:36         ` Mark Brown
2010-11-24 12:13         ` Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-24 12:13           ` Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] regulators: Update of ab8500 driver Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-23 18:25   ` Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-23 18:38   ` Mark Brown
2010-11-23 18:38     ` Mark Brown
2010-11-24  7:57     ` Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-24  7:57       ` Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-24 10:48       ` Mark Brown
2010-11-24 10:48         ` Mark Brown
2010-11-24 12:11         ` Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-24 12:11           ` Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] mach-ux500: Updated and added regulator board configuration in ab8500 Bengt Jonsson
2010-11-23 18:25   ` Bengt Jonsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CECCBAE.6080707@stericsson.com \
    --to=bengt.g.jonsson@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.