From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>,
"poky@yoctoproject.org" <poky@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: sstate status
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 05:02:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CFB7F6F.60407@mlbassoc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <625BA99ED14B2D499DC4E29D8138F1504D475430F6@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 12/05/2010 04:19 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Gary Thomas
>> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 8:48 PM
>>
>> On 12/03/2010 04:31 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>> On 12/03/2010 09:34 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I've been doing some tests with sstate, and I've managed to get to a
>>>> stage where I can share the SSTATE_DIR between my two machines (one
>>>> running Fedora 14 and the other Kubuntu 10.10) and almost get a
>>>> successful build from a clean TMPDIR. My last test got to
>>>> poky-image-minimal.do_rootfs and then failed due to some kind of
>>>> package dependency issue:
>>>>
>>>> --------- snip ---------
>>>> | Processing rpm...
>>>> | Processing zypper...
>>>> | error: Failed dependencies:
>>>> | elfutils>= 0.148 is needed by rpm-5.1.10-r7.i586
>>>> | libaugeas0>= 0.7.3 is needed by
>>>> zypper-1.4.7+git0+9eb0e248e06c8d20ad054be2439149d9ede37531-r1.i586
>>>> | ERROR: Task failed: ('function do_rootfs failed',
>>>>
>> '/home/pokystuff/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/poky-image-minimal-1.0-r0/temp/log.
>> do_rootfs.6874')
>>>>
>>>> --------- snip ---------
>>>>
>>>> A "bitbake -c clean augeas elfutils" and then "bitbake
>>>> poky-image-minimal" again went through OK (and built the
>>>> aforementioned recipes from sstate) , so I'm not sure what went wrong
>>>> here.
>>>>
>>>> My current state of work is in the paule/sstate contrib branch, which
>>>> is based on Kevin's tk/sstate branch. Kevin, I think the sooner we can
>>>> move this towards master the better, then we can get some wider testing.
>>>>
>>>> FYI Joshua has made bug #507 into a tracking bug for current sstate
>>>> issues:
>>>> http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507
>>>
>>> I gave this a simple try and it failed miserably. Working from a copy of
>>> Paul's branch in poky-contrib, here's what I did:
>>>
>>> * On machine A (x86 Fedora 11)
>>> % bitbake poky-image-minimal
>>>
>>> * On machine B (x86 Fedora 13)
>>> -- Copy sstate-cache from machine A to /tmp/sstate-cache (rsync with
>>> all perms& timestamps preserved)
>>> -- Using the identical conf/local.conf file from machine A, except
>>> I set up SSTATE_MIRRORS like this
>>> SSTATE_MIRRORS ?= "\
>>> file://.* file:///tmp/sstate-cache/"
>>> % bitbake poky-image-minimal
>>>
>>> Fell apart pretty badly. Look at the output
>>> http://www.mlbassoc.com/poky/poky_with_sstate.out
>>>
>>> Also, it seemed to be rebuilding a lot of packages. IMO, there's
>>> no reason it should have to rebuild _any_
>>>
>>
>> One thing that seems to be significant is the base build directory path.
>> In the case above, they did not match, i.e.
>> * On machine A, BUILDDIR=/tmp/sstate_testing
>> * On machine B, BUILDDIR=/home/local/my_sstate_test
>> I tried it this way as it matches my [customer's] expected usage.
>
> I think in usual case the directory paths would mismatch. So let's stick to that
> configuration to expose more issues. In my previous debug, I have made it
> in a good shape but would now turn to RP's branch to try more experiments.
>
> It would be good if you also try that one:
> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=rpurdie/tweaks2
>
>>
>> I've rerun the experiment again where I used identical paths on both
>> machines and the results were vastly improved. It still takes a horrible
>> length of time (64 minutes on a fast 4 processor box) and rebuilds way to
>> many packages for just replaying what's already been done though (IMO).
>> Results are at
>> http://www.mlbassoc.com/poky/poky_with_sstate_same_paths.out
>>
>
> In my run ~25min are consumed just for sstate check/installation on a NHM 4-core box.
> then several minutes for rootfs generation if two builds totally match. the slow sstate
> phase comes from same reason as a slow build - the 'exec' overhead. I use 'sato' as
> the target.
>
> In your case, however there're still some packages rebuilt, such as gzip-native,
> unifdef-native, eglibc-initial, ncurses, etc. and also gcc related packages are rebuilt
> which just consumes time. Has your source tree changed between the two builds?
Do, identical source trees for all three runs.
I'll try it again later today with Richard's tree.
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-05 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-03 16:34 sstate status Paul Eggleton
2010-12-03 22:11 ` Richard Purdie
2010-12-05 11:10 ` Tian, Kevin
2010-12-06 1:29 ` Richard Purdie
2010-12-07 7:46 ` Tian, Kevin
2010-12-07 15:02 ` Richard Purdie
2010-12-08 0:40 ` Tian, Kevin
2010-12-06 16:06 ` Paul Eggleton
2010-12-07 12:46 ` Richard Purdie
2010-12-07 16:36 ` Paul Eggleton
2010-12-08 11:22 ` Tian, Kevin
2010-12-08 11:31 ` Paul Eggleton
2010-12-08 11:41 ` Tian, Kevin
2010-12-03 23:31 ` Gary Thomas
2010-12-04 12:47 ` Gary Thomas
2010-12-05 11:19 ` Tian, Kevin
2010-12-05 12:02 ` Gary Thomas [this message]
2010-12-06 11:19 ` Gary Thomas
[not found] ` <4CFCC607.9040803@mlbassoc.com>
2010-12-07 7:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2010-12-05 11:07 ` Tian, Kevin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-08 14:02 Paul Eggleton
2010-12-08 14:06 ` Paul Eggleton
2010-12-08 14:15 ` Tian, Kevin
2010-12-08 14:50 ` Paul Eggleton
2010-12-08 14:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2010-12-08 14:41 ` Gary Thomas
2010-12-08 15:31 ` Gary Thomas
2010-12-08 15:55 ` Paul Eggleton
2010-12-08 17:14 ` Paul Eggleton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CFB7F6F.60407@mlbassoc.com \
--to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=poky@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.