Re: sstate status

[Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>]

On 12/08/2010 07:41 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 12/08/2010 07:06 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> On Wednesday 08 December 2010 14:02:15 Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>> I have to admit I didn't look closely enough to be sure - I was mainly
>>> testing between two different build machines which don't share the same
>>> native arch, so the native packages were rebuilt anyway. I'm starting a
>>> fresh build now with my new branch to see if I can reproduce your results.
>>
>> FYI my build just finished and it's definitely rebuilding a whole bunch of packages (and not just native ones). More concerningly it seems to have rebuilt git-native and the hash
>> has actually changed, although bitbake-diffsigs doesn't seem to be able to tell me what is different other than the hash itself.
>
> I'm running my own experiments on this branch. It seems that
> something more fundamental is broken. I first ran
> % bitbake poky-image-minimal
> which seemed to go OK although the resulting image.tar.bz2 looks
> surprisingly empty. I've not investigated this fully.
>
> Then in the same tree, nothing else touched, I ran
> % bitbake poky-image-sato
> which generated a ton of messages like these:
> NOTE: package task-base-1.0-r69: task do_populate_sysroot_setscene: Started
> NOTE: Staging package /tmp/sstate_testing/sstate-cache/sstate-task-base-qemuarm-poky-linux-gnueabi-1.0-r69-armv5te-1-f2de7ef77366ff6028dbbf54a0206318_populate-sysroot.tgz does not
> exist
> NOTE: package task-base-1.0-r69: task do_package_setscene: Started
> NOTE: Staging package /tmp/sstate_testing/sstate-cache/sstate-task-base-qemuarm-poky-linux-gnueabi-1.0-r69-armv5te-1-82eff67eab7faa49e63393c34ce384dd_package.tgz does not exist
> etc. I also have seen that if I abort this build, there are
> literally hundreds of setscene tasks pending...
>
> I've put the logs at
> http://www.mlbassoc.com/poky/poky-image-minimal-from-paule-branch
> http://www.mlbassoc.com/poky/poky-image-sato-from-paule-branch

BTW you'll notice that the second build failed (it wasn't done when
I posted this originally):

NOTE: package portmap-6.0-r7: task do_install: Started
ERROR: Task failed: ('function do_install failed', '/tmp/sstate_testing/tmp/work/armv5te-poky-linux-gnueabi/portmap-6.0-r7/temp/log.do_install.26036')
ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /tmp/sstate_testing/tmp/work/armv5te-poky-linux-gnueabi/portmap-6.0-r7/temp/log.do_install.26036
Log data follows:
| NOTE: make -e MAKEFLAGS= install DESTDIR=/tmp/sstate_testing/tmp/work/armv5te-poky-linux-gnueabi/portmap-6.0-r7/image
| install -o root -g root -m 0755 portmap /tmp/sstate_testing/tmp/work/armv5te-poky-linux-gnueabi/portmap-6.0-r7/image/sbin
| install: cannot change ownership of `/tmp/sstate_testing/tmp/work/armv5te-poky-linux-gnueabi/portmap-6.0-r7/image/sbin/portmap': Operation not permitted
| make: *** [install] Error 1
| FATAL: oe_runmake failed
| ERROR: Task failed: ('function do_install failed', '/tmp/sstate_testing/tmp/work/armv5te-poky-linux-gnueabi/portmap-6.0-r7/temp/log.do_install.26036')
NOTE: package portmap-6.0-r7: task do_install: Failed

My build host is Fedora 13 with SELinux disabled.

> Query: what sort of machine do you use for this testing? I have a
> Core-2 quad @2.4GHz with 3GB of RAM and it takes me around 5 hours
> to make a full test.
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------