All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: "Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"Varadarajan, Charulatha" <charu@ti.com>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] OMAP: mailbox: add omap_device latency information
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:45:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D05DD3A.2050807@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=cQVr-T1mJeq9uaRn5VyXxBG-xcp79z898E6nx@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/11/2010 4:25 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna<omar.ramirez@ti.com>  wrote:
>> From: Felipe Contreras<felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
>>
>> So that we can enable the main clock.
>
> This should be:
>
> Subject: OMAP: mailbox: use runtime pm for clk and sysc handling
>
> Use runtime pm APIs to enable/disable mailbox clocks and to configure
> SYSCONFIG registers.
>
> And if someone agrees, device_latency can be merged with the previous
> patch for device_build. I'll wait for comments and resubmit.

Yes, you're right, the device latency has nothing to do in that patch. 
It should be in the previous patch: [PATCH v3 4/5] OMAP: mailbox: build 
device using omap_device/omap_hwmod.

regards,
Benoit


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/5] OMAP: mailbox: add omap_device latency information
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:45:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D05DD3A.2050807@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=cQVr-T1mJeq9uaRn5VyXxBG-xcp79z898E6nx@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/11/2010 4:25 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna<omar.ramirez@ti.com>  wrote:
>> From: Felipe Contreras<felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
>>
>> So that we can enable the main clock.
>
> This should be:
>
> Subject: OMAP: mailbox: use runtime pm for clk and sysc handling
>
> Use runtime pm APIs to enable/disable mailbox clocks and to configure
> SYSCONFIG registers.
>
> And if someone agrees, device_latency can be merged with the previous
> patch for device_build. I'll wait for comments and resubmit.

Yes, you're right, the device latency has nothing to do in that patch. 
It should be in the previous patch: [PATCH v3 4/5] OMAP: mailbox: build 
device using omap_device/omap_hwmod.

regards,
Benoit

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-13  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-11  1:51 [PATCH v3 0/5] omap: mailbox: hwmod support Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-11  1:51 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-11  1:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] OMAP2: hwmod data: add mailbox data Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-11  1:51   ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-11  1:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] OMAP3: " Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-11  1:51   ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-11  1:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] OMAP4: " Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-11  1:51   ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-11  1:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] OMAP: mailbox: build device using omap_device/omap_hwmod Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-11  1:51   ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-11  1:51 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] OMAP: mailbox: add omap_device latency information Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-11  1:51   ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-11 15:25   ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2010-12-11 15:25     ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2010-12-13  8:45     ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2010-12-13  8:45       ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-12-13 18:28   ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-12-13 18:28     ` Kanigeri, Hari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D05DD3A.2050807@ti.com \
    --to=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=charu@ti.com \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=omar.ramirez@ti.com \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.