* Re: [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#3
[not found] <1292074247-20891-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
@ 2010-12-16 16:30 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-16 16:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2010-12-16 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, mingo, tglx, hpa, x86, eric.dumazet, yinghai,
brgerst, gorcunov, penberg, shaohui.zheng
(cc'ing Shaohui)
Hello, Thoams.
On 12/11/2010 02:30 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> This is the third take of unify-x86_32-and-64-NUMA-init-paths
> patchset. Most changes from the last take[L] are to reflect comments
> from tglx.
>
> * Rebased on top of tip/x86/apic-cleanup.
>
> * "x86: apic: Cleanup and simplify setup_local_APIC()" is already
> merged into x86/apic-cleanup and dropped from this series.
>
> * Instead of repurposing apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid(), replace it
> with a new 32bit specific callback
> apic->x86_32_early_logical_apicid().
>
> * For consistency, in 0012, apic->apicid_to_node() is renamed to
> x86_32_numa_cpu_node() and put inside CONFIG_X86_32.
>
> * NULL assignments for unimplemented apic ops dropped.
>
> * 0013 now explicitly describes why amd srat_detect_node() accesses
> __apicid_to_node[] directly. Also, add a comment in the function
> noting the ugliness.
>
> * Patch description updated in 0014.
>
> * Other misc updates.
Do the above changes agreeable to you? Shaohui is wondering what to
do with the conflicts between the NUMA hotplug simulator and this
series, so...
Thank you.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#3
2010-12-16 16:30 ` [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#3 Tejun Heo
@ 2010-12-16 16:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-12-16 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, hpa, x86, eric.dumazet, yinghai, brgerst,
gorcunov, penberg, shaohui.zheng
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (cc'ing Shaohui)
> Hello, Thoams.
>
> On 12/11/2010 02:30 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > This is the third take of unify-x86_32-and-64-NUMA-init-paths
> > patchset. Most changes from the last take[L] are to reflect comments
> > from tglx.
> >
> > * Rebased on top of tip/x86/apic-cleanup.
> >
> > * "x86: apic: Cleanup and simplify setup_local_APIC()" is already
> > merged into x86/apic-cleanup and dropped from this series.
> >
> > * Instead of repurposing apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid(), replace it
> > with a new 32bit specific callback
> > apic->x86_32_early_logical_apicid().
> >
> > * For consistency, in 0012, apic->apicid_to_node() is renamed to
> > x86_32_numa_cpu_node() and put inside CONFIG_X86_32.
> >
> > * NULL assignments for unimplemented apic ops dropped.
> >
> > * 0013 now explicitly describes why amd srat_detect_node() accesses
> > __apicid_to_node[] directly. Also, add a comment in the function
> > noting the ugliness.
> >
> > * Patch description updated in 0014.
> >
> > * Other misc updates.
>
> Do the above changes agreeable to you? Shaohui is wondering what to
> do with the conflicts between the NUMA hotplug simulator and this
> series, so...
I was looking with hpa into it, review still in progress.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-16 16:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1292074247-20891-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
2010-12-16 16:30 ` [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#3 Tejun Heo
2010-12-16 16:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.