* Re: [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#3 [not found] <1292074247-20891-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> @ 2010-12-16 16:30 ` Tejun Heo 2010-12-16 16:56 ` Thomas Gleixner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Tejun Heo @ 2010-12-16 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, mingo, tglx, hpa, x86, eric.dumazet, yinghai, brgerst, gorcunov, penberg, shaohui.zheng (cc'ing Shaohui) Hello, Thoams. On 12/11/2010 02:30 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > This is the third take of unify-x86_32-and-64-NUMA-init-paths > patchset. Most changes from the last take[L] are to reflect comments > from tglx. > > * Rebased on top of tip/x86/apic-cleanup. > > * "x86: apic: Cleanup and simplify setup_local_APIC()" is already > merged into x86/apic-cleanup and dropped from this series. > > * Instead of repurposing apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid(), replace it > with a new 32bit specific callback > apic->x86_32_early_logical_apicid(). > > * For consistency, in 0012, apic->apicid_to_node() is renamed to > x86_32_numa_cpu_node() and put inside CONFIG_X86_32. > > * NULL assignments for unimplemented apic ops dropped. > > * 0013 now explicitly describes why amd srat_detect_node() accesses > __apicid_to_node[] directly. Also, add a comment in the function > noting the ugliness. > > * Patch description updated in 0014. > > * Other misc updates. Do the above changes agreeable to you? Shaohui is wondering what to do with the conflicts between the NUMA hotplug simulator and this series, so... Thank you. -- tejun ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#3 2010-12-16 16:30 ` [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#3 Tejun Heo @ 2010-12-16 16:56 ` Thomas Gleixner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-12-16 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, hpa, x86, eric.dumazet, yinghai, brgerst, gorcunov, penberg, shaohui.zheng On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Tejun Heo wrote: > (cc'ing Shaohui) > Hello, Thoams. > > On 12/11/2010 02:30 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > This is the third take of unify-x86_32-and-64-NUMA-init-paths > > patchset. Most changes from the last take[L] are to reflect comments > > from tglx. > > > > * Rebased on top of tip/x86/apic-cleanup. > > > > * "x86: apic: Cleanup and simplify setup_local_APIC()" is already > > merged into x86/apic-cleanup and dropped from this series. > > > > * Instead of repurposing apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid(), replace it > > with a new 32bit specific callback > > apic->x86_32_early_logical_apicid(). > > > > * For consistency, in 0012, apic->apicid_to_node() is renamed to > > x86_32_numa_cpu_node() and put inside CONFIG_X86_32. > > > > * NULL assignments for unimplemented apic ops dropped. > > > > * 0013 now explicitly describes why amd srat_detect_node() accesses > > __apicid_to_node[] directly. Also, add a comment in the function > > noting the ugliness. > > > > * Patch description updated in 0014. > > > > * Other misc updates. > > Do the above changes agreeable to you? Shaohui is wondering what to > do with the conflicts between the NUMA hotplug simulator and this > series, so... I was looking with hpa into it, review still in progress. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-16 16:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1292074247-20891-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
2010-12-16 16:30 ` [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#3 Tejun Heo
2010-12-16 16:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.