From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
yinghai@kernel.org, brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
shaohui.zheng@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:36:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D1B8DC8.6000104@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101229105253.GK488@htj.dyndns.org>
On 12/29/2010 02:52 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:35:45PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
>> This is going to conflict with a387e95a ("") in x86/numa, so you'll need
>> the following hunk for acpi_fake_nodes(). I'm not sure why this patchset
>> is being based on x86/apic-cleanup rather than x86/numa?
>
> Because several patches from the patchset have already been committed
> into x86/apic-cleanup. Thomas, Peter, if this needs to be rebased
> somewhere, let me know.
>
x86/numa is already a dependent branch (on x86/amd-nb), so I'm fine
merging x86/apic-cleanup into that branch and then if you could rebase
it on top of the new x86/numa then I'll push it out tomorrow.
OK?
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-29 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-28 11:48 [PATCHSET REPOST] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#3 Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 01/16] x86: Kill unused static boot_cpu_logical_apicid in smpboot.c Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 02/16] x86: Rename x86_32 MAX_APICID to MAX_LOCAL_APIC Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 03/16] x86: Make default_send_IPI_mask_sequence/allbutself_logical() 32bit only Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 04/16] x86: Replace cpu_2_logical_apicid[] with early percpu variable Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 05/16] x86: Always use x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid for cpu -> logical apic id Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 06/16] x86: Kill apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 07/16] x86: Add apic->x86_32_early_logical_apicid() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 08/16] x86: Implement the default x86_32_early_logical_apicid() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 09/16] x86: Implement x86_32_early_logical_apicid() for bigsmp_32 Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 10/16] x86: Implement x86_32_early_logical_apicid() for summit_32 Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 11/16] x86: Implement x86_32_early_logical_apicid() for numaq_32 Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 12/16] x86: Replace apic->apicid_to_node() with ->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 20:35 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-29 10:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-29 19:36 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-12-29 22:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-30 11:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 14/16] x86: Unify CPU -> " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 20:39 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 15/16] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 20:43 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-30 12:48 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-30 14:58 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-30 18:40 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-31 13:20 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-31 23:09 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-30 18:43 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 16/16] x86: Unify NUMA initialization " Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-23 13:37 [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#5 Tejun Heo
2011-01-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
2010-12-30 17:49 [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#4 Tejun Heo
2010-12-30 17:49 ` [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:21 [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#2 Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
2010-12-09 21:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-10 20:45 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-10 20:54 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-10 21:17 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D1B8DC8.6000104@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.