From: lars@metafoo.de (Lars-Peter Clausen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: resume regression in 2.6.37
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:24:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D349787.80201@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1101171142380.2678@localhost6.localdomain6>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/17/2011 01:40 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 18:33 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>>>> Without the revert there is absolutely no sign of resume. With the
>>>> change reverted I can see that the PXA powers up again, there's an LED
>>>> showing that the USB controller has power again. Unfortunately there's
>>>> seems to be another problem and the resume doesn't complete. I've tried
>>>> to get console output by using no_console_suspend, but there's just
>>>> gibberish on the console after resume :(
>>>>
>>>> Any idea on how to proceed from here? I could perhaps ask our hardware
>>>> engineer to try find out where exactly we are stuck in the resume. But
>>>> I'd like to avoid that if possible.
>>>
>>> Can you stick a printk into the set_wake() function of that irq chip
>>> and print the irq and on arguments and the return value . Run that
>>> with both stock 2.6.37 and the patch reverted.
>>
>> pxa3xx_set_wake(31, 1) returns 0
>>
>> Same result with stock 2.6.37 and the patch reverted. Except that
>> without the patch reverted, the device doesn't power up again.
>
> Ok, can we agree that the patch has no functional impact on the
> set_wake function? And I don't see a reason why reverting that patch
> results in a working resume. That does not make sense at all. Which
> compiler version are you using ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
Hi
If you take a look at the pxa gpio irq handling you'll see that it sets the
"set_wake" field of it's irq_chip after calling set_irq_chip for all of the irqs, so
the compat handler gets never installed.
So I guess the following patch fixes it:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
- --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
@@ -111,13 +111,13 @@ static void __init pxa_init_low_gpio_irq(set_wake_t fn)
GRER0 &= ~0x3;
GEDR0 = 0x3;
+ pxa_low_gpio_chip.set_wake = fn;
+
for (irq = IRQ_GPIO0; irq <= IRQ_GPIO1; irq++) {
set_irq_chip(irq, &pxa_low_gpio_chip);
set_irq_handler(irq, handle_edge_irq);
set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
}
- -
- - pxa_low_gpio_chip.set_wake = fn;
}
void __init pxa_init_irq(int irq_nr, set_wake_t fn)
@@ -142,13 +142,14 @@ void __init pxa_init_irq(int irq_nr, set_wake_t fn)
/* only unmasked interrupts kick us out of idle */
ICCR = 1;
+ pxa_internal_irq_chip.set_wake = fn;
+
for (irq = PXA_IRQ(0); irq < PXA_IRQ(irq_nr); irq++) {
set_irq_chip(irq, &pxa_internal_irq_chip);
set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
}
- - pxa_internal_irq_chip.set_wake = fn;
pxa_init_low_gpio_irq(fn);
}
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk00l4cACgkQBX4mSR26RiMTMQCdGCiu3ALAIEe0dUkX3u5xeHmz
dggAnj2cePanr6HFi+6KQ4tF7cT6xoq0
=yxJs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sven Neumann <s.neumann@raumfeld.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Subject: Re: resume regression in 2.6.37
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:24:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D349787.80201@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1101171142380.2678@localhost6.localdomain6>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/17/2011 01:40 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 18:33 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>>>> Without the revert there is absolutely no sign of resume. With the
>>>> change reverted I can see that the PXA powers up again, there's an LED
>>>> showing that the USB controller has power again. Unfortunately there's
>>>> seems to be another problem and the resume doesn't complete. I've tried
>>>> to get console output by using no_console_suspend, but there's just
>>>> gibberish on the console after resume :(
>>>>
>>>> Any idea on how to proceed from here? I could perhaps ask our hardware
>>>> engineer to try find out where exactly we are stuck in the resume. But
>>>> I'd like to avoid that if possible.
>>>
>>> Can you stick a printk into the set_wake() function of that irq chip
>>> and print the irq and on arguments and the return value . Run that
>>> with both stock 2.6.37 and the patch reverted.
>>
>> pxa3xx_set_wake(31, 1) returns 0
>>
>> Same result with stock 2.6.37 and the patch reverted. Except that
>> without the patch reverted, the device doesn't power up again.
>
> Ok, can we agree that the patch has no functional impact on the
> set_wake function? And I don't see a reason why reverting that patch
> results in a working resume. That does not make sense at all. Which
> compiler version are you using ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
Hi
If you take a look at the pxa gpio irq handling you'll see that it sets the
"set_wake" field of it's irq_chip after calling set_irq_chip for all of the irqs, so
the compat handler gets never installed.
So I guess the following patch fixes it:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
- --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
@@ -111,13 +111,13 @@ static void __init pxa_init_low_gpio_irq(set_wake_t fn)
GRER0 &= ~0x3;
GEDR0 = 0x3;
+ pxa_low_gpio_chip.set_wake = fn;
+
for (irq = IRQ_GPIO0; irq <= IRQ_GPIO1; irq++) {
set_irq_chip(irq, &pxa_low_gpio_chip);
set_irq_handler(irq, handle_edge_irq);
set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
}
- -
- - pxa_low_gpio_chip.set_wake = fn;
}
void __init pxa_init_irq(int irq_nr, set_wake_t fn)
@@ -142,13 +142,14 @@ void __init pxa_init_irq(int irq_nr, set_wake_t fn)
/* only unmasked interrupts kick us out of idle */
ICCR = 1;
+ pxa_internal_irq_chip.set_wake = fn;
+
for (irq = PXA_IRQ(0); irq < PXA_IRQ(irq_nr); irq++) {
set_irq_chip(irq, &pxa_internal_irq_chip);
set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
}
- - pxa_internal_irq_chip.set_wake = fn;
pxa_init_low_gpio_irq(fn);
}
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk00l4cACgkQBX4mSR26RiMTMQCdGCiu3ALAIEe0dUkX3u5xeHmz
dggAnj2cePanr6HFi+6KQ4tF7cT6xoq0
=yxJs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-17 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-13 15:44 resume regression in 2.6.37 Sven Neumann
2011-01-13 15:44 ` Sven Neumann
2011-01-13 16:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-13 16:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-13 17:16 ` Sven Neumann
2011-01-13 17:16 ` Sven Neumann
2011-01-13 17:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-13 17:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-17 10:36 ` Sven Neumann
2011-01-17 10:36 ` Sven Neumann
2011-01-17 12:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-17 12:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-17 14:04 ` Sven Neumann
2011-01-17 14:04 ` Sven Neumann
2011-01-17 18:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-17 18:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-17 19:24 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2011-01-17 19:24 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-01-17 19:59 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-01-17 19:59 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-01-18 8:16 ` Sven Neumann
2011-01-18 8:16 ` Sven Neumann
2011-01-18 8:18 ` [PATCH] pxa3xx: fix PXA GPIO IRQ handling Sven Neumann
2011-01-18 8:18 ` Sven Neumann
2011-01-18 11:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-01-18 11:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-01-18 11:47 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-01-18 11:47 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-01-18 12:29 ` [PATCH] ARM: pxa: fix " Sven Neumann
2011-01-18 12:29 ` Sven Neumann
2011-01-18 16:15 ` [PATCH] pxa3xx: fix PXA " Eric Miao
2011-01-18 16:15 ` Eric Miao
2011-01-18 16:20 ` Lennert Buijtenhek
2011-01-18 16:20 ` Lennert Buijtenhek
2011-01-18 21:49 ` Sven Neumann
2011-01-18 21:49 ` Sven Neumann
2011-01-20 18:48 ` Eric Miao
2011-01-20 18:48 ` Eric Miao
2011-01-20 18:55 ` Eric Miao
2011-01-20 18:55 ` Eric Miao
2011-01-18 8:19 ` resume regression in 2.6.37 Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-18 8:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D349787.80201@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.