* [ath9k-devel] Are there hard limits on ATH_TXBUF?
@ 2011-02-04 20:24 Ben Greear
2011-02-04 20:59 ` Felix Fietkau
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ben Greear @ 2011-02-04 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
I wanted to see if I could increase throughput in multi-vif scenario
by increasing the ATH_MAX_QDEPTH (by increasing ATH_TXBUF).
Is this a pure software thing, or are there hardware limitations
I should be aware of?
/***********/
/* RX / TX */
/***********/
#define ATH_MAX_ANTENNA 3
#define ATH_RXBUF 512
#define ATH_TXBUF 512
#define ATH_TXBUF_RESERVE 5
#define ATH_MAX_QDEPTH (ATH_TXBUF / 4 - ATH_TXBUF_RESERVE)
#define ATH_TXMAXTRY 13
#define ATH_MGT_TXMAXTRY 4
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] Are there hard limits on ATH_TXBUF?
2011-02-04 20:24 [ath9k-devel] Are there hard limits on ATH_TXBUF? Ben Greear
@ 2011-02-04 20:59 ` Felix Fietkau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Felix Fietkau @ 2011-02-04 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
On 2011-02-04 9:24 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> I wanted to see if I could increase throughput in multi-vif scenario
> by increasing the ATH_MAX_QDEPTH (by increasing ATH_TXBUF).
>
> Is this a pure software thing, or are there hardware limitations
> I should be aware of?
It's a pure software thing.
- Felix
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-04 20:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-04 20:24 [ath9k-devel] Are there hard limits on ATH_TXBUF? Ben Greear
2011-02-04 20:59 ` Felix Fietkau
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.