* Ångström versions?
@ 2011-02-04 11:51 Steffen Sledz
2011-02-09 7:52 ` Steffen Sledz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Sledz @ 2011-02-04 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
I'm a bit confused about the Angstrom versions.
Setting in local.conf is
DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1"
but bitbake reports
Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION = "1.10.2"
METADATA_BRANCH = "testing-next"
METADATA_REVISION = "3a7b93a"
TARGET_ARCH = "arm"
TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi"
MACHINE = "hipox"
DISTRO = "angstrom"
DISTRO_VERSION = "2010.7-test-20110204"
TARGET_FPU = "soft"
Is this intented?
BTW: Which is the suggested/released Ångström version? http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/ seems to be not very helpful here. e.g. the FAQ link results in an PAGE NOT FOUND. :(
Steffen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Ångström versions?
2011-02-04 11:51 Ångström versions? Steffen Sledz
@ 2011-02-09 7:52 ` Steffen Sledz
2011-02-09 9:06 ` Henning Heinold
2011-02-09 9:10 ` Graeme Gregory
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Sledz @ 2011-02-09 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel; +Cc: Koen Kooi
Am 04.02.2011 12:51, schrieb Steffen Sledz:
> I'm a bit confused about the Angstrom versions.
>
> Setting in local.conf is
>
> DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1"
>
> but bitbake reports
>
> Build Configuration:
> BB_VERSION = "1.10.2"
> METADATA_BRANCH = "testing-next"
> METADATA_REVISION = "3a7b93a"
> TARGET_ARCH = "arm"
> TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi"
> MACHINE = "hipox"
> DISTRO = "angstrom"
> DISTRO_VERSION = "2010.7-test-20110204"
> TARGET_FPU = "soft"
>
> Is this intented?
>
> BTW: Which is the suggested/released Ångström version? http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/ seems to be not very helpful here. e.g. the FAQ link results in an PAGE NOT FOUND. :(
Ping!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Ångström versions?
2011-02-09 7:52 ` Steffen Sledz
@ 2011-02-09 9:06 ` Henning Heinold
2011-02-09 9:10 ` Graeme Gregory
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Henning Heinold @ 2011-02-09 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 08:52:45AM +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote:
> Am 04.02.2011 12:51, schrieb Steffen Sledz:
> > I'm a bit confused about the Angstrom versions.
> >
> > Setting in local.conf is
> >
> > DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1"
> >
> > but bitbake reports
> >
> > Build Configuration:
> > BB_VERSION = "1.10.2"
> > METADATA_BRANCH = "testing-next"
> > METADATA_REVISION = "3a7b93a"
> > TARGET_ARCH = "arm"
> > TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi"
> > MACHINE = "hipox"
> > DISTRO = "angstrom"
> > DISTRO_VERSION = "2010.7-test-20110204"
> > TARGET_FPU = "soft"
> >
> > Is this intented?
> >
> > BTW: Which is the suggested/released Ångström version? http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/ seems to be not very helpful here. e.g. the FAQ link results in an PAGE NOT FOUND. :(
>
> Ping!
Hi,
I would do the following bitbake -e foo-target, gives me all variables. Than I would compare the PREFERRED_VERSION stuff
with the one from 2008.1 and 2010.x to see what was choosen. But I am sure it's 2008.1 and only the version
is somehow wrong.
Bye Henning
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Ångström versions?
2011-02-09 7:52 ` Steffen Sledz
2011-02-09 9:06 ` Henning Heinold
@ 2011-02-09 9:10 ` Graeme Gregory
2011-02-09 9:23 ` Steffen Sledz
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Graeme Gregory @ 2011-02-09 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On 09/02/2011 07:52, Steffen Sledz wrote:
> Am 04.02.2011 12:51, schrieb Steffen Sledz:
>> I'm a bit confused about the Angstrom versions.
>>
>> Setting in local.conf is
>>
>> DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1"
>>
>> but bitbake reports
>>
>> Build Configuration:
>> BB_VERSION = "1.10.2"
>> METADATA_BRANCH = "testing-next"
>> METADATA_REVISION = "3a7b93a"
>> TARGET_ARCH = "arm"
>> TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi"
>> MACHINE = "hipox"
>> DISTRO = "angstrom"
>> DISTRO_VERSION = "2010.7-test-20110204"
>> TARGET_FPU = "soft"
>>
>> Is this intented?
>>
>> BTW: Which is the suggested/released Ångström version? http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/ seems to be not very helpful here. e.g. the FAQ link results in an PAGE NOT FOUND. :(
2008.1 is the "stable" version of Angstrom which has all the benefit of
our extensive toolchain testing.
2010.x is angstrom-next and is the in progress version moving to gcc 4.5
blah blah blah.
Graeme
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Ångström versions?
2011-02-09 9:10 ` Graeme Gregory
@ 2011-02-09 9:23 ` Steffen Sledz
2011-02-09 9:30 ` Graeme Gregory
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Sledz @ 2011-02-09 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Am 09.02.2011 10:10, schrieb Graeme Gregory:
> On 09/02/2011 07:52, Steffen Sledz wrote:
>> Am 04.02.2011 12:51, schrieb Steffen Sledz:
>>> I'm a bit confused about the Angstrom versions.
>>>
>>> Setting in local.conf is
>>>
>>> DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1"
>>>
>>> but bitbake reports
>>>
>>> Build Configuration:
>>> BB_VERSION = "1.10.2"
>>> METADATA_BRANCH = "testing-next"
>>> METADATA_REVISION = "3a7b93a"
>>> TARGET_ARCH = "arm"
>>> TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi"
>>> MACHINE = "hipox"
>>> DISTRO = "angstrom"
>>> DISTRO_VERSION = "2010.7-test-20110204"
>>> TARGET_FPU = "soft"
>>>
>>> Is this intented?
>>>
>>> BTW: Which is the suggested/released Ångström version? http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/ seems to be not very helpful here. e.g. the FAQ link results in an PAGE NOT FOUND. :(
> 2008.1 is the "stable" version of Angstrom which has all the benefit of
> our extensive toolchain testing.
>
> 2010.x is angstrom-next and is the in progress version moving to gcc 4.5
> blah blah blah.
OK, but why bitbake reports DISTRO_VERSION = "2010.7-test-20110204" if it is set to DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1" ???
Steffen
--
DResearch Fahrzeugelektronik GmbH
Otto-Schmirgal-Str. 3, 10319 Berlin, Germany
Tel: +49 30 515932-237 mailto:sledz@DResearch.de
Fax: +49 30 515932-299
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Weber, Werner Mögle;
Amtsgericht Berlin Charlottenburg; HRB 130120 B;
Ust.-IDNr. DE273952058
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Ångström versions?
2011-02-09 9:23 ` Steffen Sledz
@ 2011-02-09 9:30 ` Graeme Gregory
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Graeme Gregory @ 2011-02-09 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steffen Sledz; +Cc: openembedded-devel
On 09/02/2011 09:23, Steffen Sledz wrote:
> Am 09.02.2011 10:10, schrieb Graeme Gregory:
>> On 09/02/2011 07:52, Steffen Sledz wrote:
>>> Am 04.02.2011 12:51, schrieb Steffen Sledz:
>>>> I'm a bit confused about the Angstrom versions.
>>>>
>>>> Setting in local.conf is
>>>>
>>>> DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1"
>>>>
>>>> but bitbake reports
>>>>
>>>> Build Configuration:
>>>> BB_VERSION = "1.10.2"
>>>> METADATA_BRANCH = "testing-next"
>>>> METADATA_REVISION = "3a7b93a"
>>>> TARGET_ARCH = "arm"
>>>> TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi"
>>>> MACHINE = "hipox"
>>>> DISTRO = "angstrom"
>>>> DISTRO_VERSION = "2010.7-test-20110204"
>>>> TARGET_FPU = "soft"
>>>>
>>>> Is this intented?
>>>>
>>>> BTW: Which is the suggested/released Ångström version? http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/ seems to be not very helpful here. e.g. the FAQ link results in an PAGE NOT FOUND. :(
>> 2008.1 is the "stable" version of Angstrom which has all the benefit of
>> our extensive toolchain testing.
>>
>> 2010.x is angstrom-next and is the in progress version moving to gcc 4.5
>> blah blah blah.
> OK, but why bitbake reports DISTRO_VERSION = "2010.7-test-20110204" if it is set to DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1" ???
>
Because thats the actual version of the DISTRO produced.
We discovered if we rename the file people dont read emails or error
messages and waste a week debugging non issues so we stopped renaming
the file.
Graeme
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-09 9:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-04 11:51 Ångström versions? Steffen Sledz
2011-02-09 7:52 ` Steffen Sledz
2011-02-09 9:06 ` Henning Heinold
2011-02-09 9:10 ` Graeme Gregory
2011-02-09 9:23 ` Steffen Sledz
2011-02-09 9:30 ` Graeme Gregory
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.