All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
Cc: poky@pokylinux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] u-boot: compile with -O2 on PowerPC
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:34:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D53249E.9030606@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D53216D.4010908@emcraft.com>

On 02/09/2011 03:21 PM, Ilya Yanok wrote:
> Hi Darren,
>
> 09.02.2011 20:42, Darren Hart wrote:
>> This is already disabled in u-boot.inc with the following line:
>>
>> # GCC 4.5.1 builds unusable binaries using -Os, remove it from OPTFLAGS
>> EXTRA_OEMAKE = "CROSS_COMPILE=${TARGET_PREFIX} OPTFLAGS=''"
>
> Yes, sorry, I've useed not up-to-date version of metadata and missed
> this fix. But it has to be '-O2' still.

Understood, -O2 is in master now for all arches.

>
>> Resetting OPTFLAGS to '' removes the -Os from the variable in the
>> Makefile. This isn't just a PowerPC problem, it also manifested on ARM,
>> I believe it is a GCC 4.5.1 issue.
>
> Well, the difference here is that on PowerPC we have -Os option disabled
> completely. Wolfgang tried to summarize know gcc bugs and seems like -Os
> bugs on ARM and PowerPC have different nature (it looks like bugs on ARM
> are already fixed while on the ones PowerPC are not).
> Then I think it's a bad idea to remove -Os everywhere: U-Boot really
> wants to be built with -Os optimization so we might want to change
> optimization level to -O2 only for targets where it's absolutely
> required. Actually I was able to build and successfully run U-Boot on
> beagleboard with -Os so it doesn't look like it's completely broken on ARM.

Interesting - is this using the current recipe in poky? It was building 
for the beagleboard that I hit the bug which caused me to clear -Os from 
the EXTRA_OEMAKE arguments.


-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-09 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-08 20:26 [PATCH 1/3] linux: add LIC_FILES_CHKSUM Ilya Yanok
2011-02-08 20:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] u-boot: " Ilya Yanok
2011-02-09 17:38   ` Darren Hart
2011-02-09 17:42     ` Gary Thomas
2011-02-09 23:02       ` Ilya Yanok
2011-02-09 22:58     ` Ilya Yanok
2011-02-09 23:04       ` Darren Hart
2011-02-09 23:25         ` Ilya Yanok
2011-02-09 23:38           ` Darren Hart
2011-02-09 23:43             ` Ilya Yanok
2011-02-10  0:06               ` Darren Hart
2011-02-10  0:42                 ` Richard Purdie
2011-02-08 20:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] u-boot: compile with -O2 on PowerPC Ilya Yanok
2011-02-09 17:42   ` Darren Hart
2011-02-09 18:05     ` Adrian Alonso
2011-02-09 18:40       ` Darren Hart
2011-02-09 18:15     ` Koen Kooi
2011-02-09 18:27       ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-09 23:21     ` Ilya Yanok
2011-02-09 23:34       ` Darren Hart [this message]
2011-02-09 23:48         ` Ilya Yanok
2011-02-09 11:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] linux: add LIC_FILES_CHKSUM Richard Purdie
2011-02-09 17:33 ` Darren Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D53249E.9030606@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=poky@pokylinux.org \
    --cc=yanok@emcraft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.