Release-2011.03 status

Release-2011.03 status

[Tom Rini]

Hey all,

Over at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3284539/ac9745f0fe_results.pdf you can 
see the results of my build over the weekend.  It's a bit scary but...

Fixed:
- minimal-uclibc/*/* was broken due to needing xattr in DISTRO_FEATURES
- ucslug/sheevaplug/* was broken due to TARGET_ARCH in distro.conf

Not fixed:
antgw100: Needs the linux/socket.h > sys/socket.h thing someone else 
mentioned.
various/angstrom*/angstrom-gnome-image: evince needs various docbook 
things installed that we don't build, don't force the host to have and 
isn't 100% trivial to switch to building (I've started on this path but 
haven't gotten it quite right).
- various/shr/shr-image: The libvpx work-around 
(http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/256/) to link.
- qemux86/minimal*/*: A hard RPATH issue where we're getting away, 
usually, with libXrandr from the host, but this build host is really 
stripped down.  I bisected this down to when we fixed RPATH stuff in 
9432df5a1c96f7b2e625abba0e011ad45d5aef92 and it's a bug in some recipe.
- various/shr/shr-image: A problem with python-elementary/elementary 
disagreeing on version stuff, will post later.

So, my current plan of attack is to do what I've said before and merge 
the libvpx work-around, tag, revert the libvpx work-around (per Khem's 
request).  And I plan to do this tomorrow unless people shout about 
wanting to fix something they know is broken and need a little more time.

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation

Re: Release-2011.03 status

[Stefan Schmidt]

Hello.

On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 08:31, Tom Rini wrote:
> 
> So, my current plan of attack is to do what I've said before and
> merge the libvpx work-around, tag, revert the libvpx work-around
> (per Khem's request).  And I plan to do this tomorrow unless people
> shout about wanting to fix something they know is broken and need a
> little more time.

For llvm and thus openjdk-6 we need the patch merged I posted today. I'm not
completely sure that it is the best solutions thats why I posted it instead of
just commit it.

regards
Stefan Schmidt

Re: Release-2011.03 status

[Tom Rini]

On 02/28/2011 10:01 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 08:31, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>> So, my current plan of attack is to do what I've said before and
>> merge the libvpx work-around, tag, revert the libvpx work-around
>> (per Khem's request).  And I plan to do this tomorrow unless people
>> shout about wanting to fix something they know is broken and need a
>> little more time.
>
> For llvm and thus openjdk-6 we need the patch merged I posted today. I'm not
> completely sure that it is the best solutions thats why I posted it instead of
> just commit it.

Hmm, can you show the failure log?  Thanks!

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation

Re: Release-2011.03 status

[Stefan Schmidt]

Hello.

On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 11:48, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 02/28/2011 10:01 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >Hello.
> >
> >On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 08:31, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>
> >>So, my current plan of attack is to do what I've said before and
> >>merge the libvpx work-around, tag, revert the libvpx work-around
> >>(per Khem's request).  And I plan to do this tomorrow unless people
> >>shout about wanting to fix something they know is broken and need a
> >>little more time.
> >
> >For llvm and thus openjdk-6 we need the patch merged I posted today. I'm not
> >completely sure that it is the best solutions thats why I posted it instead of
> >just commit it.
> 
> Hmm, can you show the failure log?  Thanks!

It was just a string concatenation form a path and the TOOLCHAIN_OPTIONS
variable. Khem already acked the patch I posted and I pushed it.

With that one and my last version bump I'm good with openjdk-6 here for the
release.

regards
Stefan Schmidt