From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
cluster-devel@redhat.com,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check for immutable flag in fallocate path
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 09:19:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6DFDAA.3060006@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110227224940.GL2924@thunk.org>
Il 27/02/2011 23:49, Ted Ts'o ha scritto:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 05:50:21PM +0100, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>> 2011/2/21 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>:
>>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 09:26:32AM +0100, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>>>> From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> All fs must check for the immutable flag in their fallocate callback.
>>>> It's possible to have a race condition in this scenario: an application
>>>> open a file in read/write and it does something, meanwhile root set the
>>>> immutable flag on the file, the application at that point can call
>>>> fallocate with success. Only Ocfs2 check for the immutable flag at the
>>>> moment.
>>>
>>> Please add the check in fs/open.c:do_fallocate() so that it covers all
>>> filesystems.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The check should be done after the fs got the inode mutex lock.
>
> Why? None of the other places which check the IMMUTABLE flag do so
I add to my previous response an other point: IMHO each fs should check
for it because after the inclusion of punch hole patch, the fs
can/cannot check for the append-only flag. So XFS (it supports the
"unreserve") should check even for append. I think we don't want to
allow this operation for an append-only file, isn't it? About this point
I'll update and resend my patch.
Marco
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
cluster-devel@redhat.com,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check for immutable flag in fallocate path
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 09:19:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6DFDAA.3060006@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110227224940.GL2924@thunk.org>
Il 27/02/2011 23:49, Ted Ts'o ha scritto:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 05:50:21PM +0100, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>> 2011/2/21 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>:
>>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 09:26:32AM +0100, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>>>> From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> All fs must check for the immutable flag in their fallocate callback.
>>>> It's possible to have a race condition in this scenario: an application
>>>> open a file in read/write and it does something, meanwhile root set the
>>>> immutable flag on the file, the application at that point can call
>>>> fallocate with success. Only Ocfs2 check for the immutable flag at the
>>>> moment.
>>>
>>> Please add the check in fs/open.c:do_fallocate() so that it covers all
>>> filesystems.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The check should be done after the fs got the inode mutex lock.
>
> Why? None of the other places which check the IMMUTABLE flag do so
I add to my previous response an other point: IMHO each fs should check
for it because after the inclusion of punch hole patch, the fs
can/cannot check for the append-only flag. So XFS (it supports the
"unreserve") should check even for append. I think we don't want to
allow this operation for an append-only file, isn't it? About this point
I'll update and resend my patch.
Marco
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
cluster-devel@redhat.com,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check for immutable flag in fallocate path
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 09:19:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6DFDAA.3060006@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110227224940.GL2924@thunk.org>
Il 27/02/2011 23:49, Ted Ts'o ha scritto:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 05:50:21PM +0100, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>> 2011/2/21 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>:
>>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 09:26:32AM +0100, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>>>> From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> All fs must check for the immutable flag in their fallocate callback.
>>>> It's possible to have a race condition in this scenario: an application
>>>> open a file in read/write and it does something, meanwhile root set the
>>>> immutable flag on the file, the application at that point can call
>>>> fallocate with success. Only Ocfs2 check for the immutable flag at the
>>>> moment.
>>>
>>> Please add the check in fs/open.c:do_fallocate() so that it covers all
>>> filesystems.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The check should be done after the fs got the inode mutex lock.
>
> Why? None of the other places which check the IMMUTABLE flag do so
I add to my previous response an other point: IMHO each fs should check
for it because after the inclusion of punch hole patch, the fs
can/cannot check for the append-only flag. So XFS (it supports the
"unreserve") should check even for append. I think we don't want to
allow this operation for an append-only file, isn't it? About this point
I'll update and resend my patch.
Marco
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-02 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-21 8:26 [PATCH] Check for immutable flag in fallocate path Marco Stornelli
2011-02-21 8:26 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-02-21 12:46 ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2011-02-21 12:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-02-21 12:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-02-21 16:50 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-02-21 16:50 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-02-27 22:49 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-02-27 22:49 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-02-28 7:53 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-02-28 7:53 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-02-28 7:53 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-02-28 7:53 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-02-28 7:53 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-02 8:19 ` Marco Stornelli [this message]
2011-03-02 8:19 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-02 8:19 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-02 8:19 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-02-26 14:59 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-02-26 14:59 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-03 8:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Marco Stornelli
2011-03-03 8:42 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-03 21:39 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-03 21:39 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-04 8:17 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-04 8:17 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-04 12:18 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-04 12:18 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-14 10:24 ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-14 10:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-14 10:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-14 10:40 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-14 10:40 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-14 10:40 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-14 10:40 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-05 9:37 ` [PATCH v3] Check for immutable/append " Marco Stornelli
2011-03-05 10:00 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-03-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v3][RESEND] " Marco Stornelli
2011-03-09 19:42 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-09 21:27 ` Greg KH
2011-03-10 12:03 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-08 5:11 ` [PATCH v3] " Dave Chinner
2011-03-08 5:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-03-08 7:35 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-08 7:35 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-03-09 1:30 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D6DFDAA.3060006@gmail.com \
--to=marco.stornelli@gmail.com \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.