Ask for a bb.file of mrouted-3.9.4.tar.gz

Ask for a bb.file of mrouted-3.9.4.tar.gz

[wyang]

Hello all
    Does anyone have the bb.file of mrouted-3.9.4.tar.gz ?
thanks very much

[PATCH] mrouted-3.9.4: intitial recipe

[Andreas Oberritter]

Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>
---
This was only compile-tested. It would be nice to get some feedback.

 recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb

diff --git a/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb b/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4ba4111
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "DVMRP multicast routing daemon"
+HOMEPAGE = "http://troglobit.com/mrouted.shtml"
+SECTION = "network"
+LICENSE = "BSD"
+
+SRC_URI = "ftp://ftp.vmlinux.org/pub/People/jocke/mrouted/mrouted-${PV}.tar.bz2"
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "688b74fc42919d588f262e6b3c9c6d4c"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "c697549b2e506a380575f7adb67e87288ef2295b97241b3a1aeb0e88b827a3e1"
+
+EXTRA_OEMAKE = " \
+        datadir=${datadir} \
+        mandir=${mandir} \
+        prefix=${prefix} \
+        sysconfdir=${sysconfdir} \
+        DESTDIR=${D} \
+"
+
+do_compile() {
+        oe_runmake
+}
+do_install() {
+        oe_runmake install
+}
-- 
1.7.2.3

Re: [PATCH] mrouted-3.9.4: intitial recipe

[Khem Raj]

On 3/4/2011 5:12 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter<obi@opendreambox.org>
> ---
> This was only compile-tested. It would be nice to get some feedback.

Looks ok to me. Does it need any deps? May be building it from scratch 
will detect it if not otherwise

Acked-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

>
>   recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
>
> diff --git a/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb b/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4ba4111
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> +DESCRIPTION = "DVMRP multicast routing daemon"
> +HOMEPAGE = "http://troglobit.com/mrouted.shtml"
> +SECTION = "network"
> +LICENSE = "BSD"
> +
> +SRC_URI = "ftp://ftp.vmlinux.org/pub/People/jocke/mrouted/mrouted-${PV}.tar.bz2"
> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "688b74fc42919d588f262e6b3c9c6d4c"
> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "c697549b2e506a380575f7adb67e87288ef2295b97241b3a1aeb0e88b827a3e1"
> +
> +EXTRA_OEMAKE = " \
> +        datadir=${datadir} \
> +        mandir=${mandir} \
> +        prefix=${prefix} \
> +        sysconfdir=${sysconfdir} \
> +        DESTDIR=${D} \
> +"
> +
> +do_compile() {
> +        oe_runmake
> +}
> +do_install() {
> +        oe_runmake install
> +}

Re: [PATCH] mrouted-3.9.4: intitial recipe

[Paul Menzel]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1711 bytes --]

Am Freitag, den 04.03.2011, 07:40 -0800 schrieb Khem Raj:
> On 3/4/2011 5:12 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter<obi@opendreambox.org>
> > ---
> > This was only compile-tested. It would be nice to get some feedback.
> 
> Looks ok to me. Does it need any deps? May be building it from scratch 
> will detect it if not otherwise
> 
> Acked-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

With the dependencies addressed and …

> >   recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
> >
> > diff --git a/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb b/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..4ba4111
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
> > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> > +DESCRIPTION = "DVMRP multicast routing daemon"
> > +HOMEPAGE = "http://troglobit.com/mrouted.shtml"
> > +SECTION = "network"
> > +LICENSE = "BSD"
> > +
> > +SRC_URI = "ftp://ftp.vmlinux.org/pub/People/jocke/mrouted/mrouted-${PV}.tar.bz2"
> > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "688b74fc42919d588f262e6b3c9c6d4c"
> > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "c697549b2e506a380575f7adb67e87288ef2295b97241b3a1aeb0e88b827a3e1"
> > +
> > +EXTRA_OEMAKE = " \
> > +        datadir=${datadir} \
> > +        mandir=${mandir} \
> > +        prefix=${prefix} \
> > +        sysconfdir=${sysconfdir} \
> > +        DESTDIR=${D} \
> > +"
> > +
> > +do_compile() {
> > +        oe_runmake
> > +}

… add a blank line (?) this is

Acked-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>

> > +do_install() {
> > +        oe_runmake install
> > +}

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] mrouted-3.9.4: intitial recipe

[Andreas Oberritter]

On 03/04/2011 05:14 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 04.03.2011, 07:40 -0800 schrieb Khem Raj:
>> On 3/4/2011 5:12 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter<obi@opendreambox.org>
>>> ---
>>> This was only compile-tested. It would be nice to get some feedback.
>>
>> Looks ok to me. Does it need any deps? May be building it from scratch 
>> will detect it if not otherwise
>>
>> Acked-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> 
> With the dependencies addressed and …

Other than using bison, there are no dependencies that I know of.
Binutils already depends on bison, so it's always available to cross
recipes. Should it be mentioned in mrouted explicitly, or is this a case
like binutils, gcc and libc, which never need to be mentioned in DEPENDS?

>>>   recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>   create mode 100644 recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
>>>
>>> diff --git a/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb b/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..4ba4111
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
>>> +DESCRIPTION = "DVMRP multicast routing daemon"
>>> +HOMEPAGE = "http://troglobit.com/mrouted.shtml"
>>> +SECTION = "network"
>>> +LICENSE = "BSD"
>>> +
>>> +SRC_URI = "ftp://ftp.vmlinux.org/pub/People/jocke/mrouted/mrouted-${PV}.tar.bz2"
>>> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "688b74fc42919d588f262e6b3c9c6d4c"
>>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "c697549b2e506a380575f7adb67e87288ef2295b97241b3a1aeb0e88b827a3e1"
>>> +
>>> +EXTRA_OEMAKE = " \
>>> +        datadir=${datadir} \
>>> +        mandir=${mandir} \
>>> +        prefix=${prefix} \
>>> +        sysconfdir=${sysconfdir} \
>>> +        DESTDIR=${D} \
>>> +"
>>> +
>>> +do_compile() {
>>> +        oe_runmake
>>> +}
> 
> … add a blank line (?) this is

That's the output of oe-stylize. Should oe-stylize be changed to add an
empty line between functions?

> Acked-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
> 
>>> +do_install() {
>>> +        oe_runmake install
>>> +}
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [PATCH] mrouted-3.9.4: intitial recipe

[Tom Rini]

On 03/04/2011 09:14 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 04.03.2011, 07:40 -0800 schrieb Khem Raj:
>> On 3/4/2011 5:12 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter<obi@opendreambox.org>
>>> ---
>>> This was only compile-tested. It would be nice to get some feedback.
>>
>> Looks ok to me. Does it need any deps? May be building it from scratch
>> will detect it if not otherwise
>>
>> Acked-by: Khem Raj<raj.khem@gmail.com>
>
> With the dependencies addressed and …
>
>>>    recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>    create mode 100644 recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
>>>
>>> diff --git a/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb b/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..4ba4111
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
>>> +DESCRIPTION = "DVMRP multicast routing daemon"
>>> +HOMEPAGE = "http://troglobit.com/mrouted.shtml"
>>> +SECTION = "network"
>>> +LICENSE = "BSD"
>>> +
>>> +SRC_URI = "ftp://ftp.vmlinux.org/pub/People/jocke/mrouted/mrouted-${PV}.tar.bz2"
>>> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "688b74fc42919d588f262e6b3c9c6d4c"
>>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "c697549b2e506a380575f7adb67e87288ef2295b97241b3a1aeb0e88b827a3e1"
>>> +
>>> +EXTRA_OEMAKE = " \
>>> +        datadir=${datadir} \
>>> +        mandir=${mandir} \
>>> +        prefix=${prefix} \
>>> +        sysconfdir=${sysconfdir} \
>>> +        DESTDIR=${D} \
>>> +"
>>> +
>>> +do_compile() {
>>> +        oe_runmake
>>> +}
>
> … add a blank line (?) this is
>
> Acked-by: Paul Menzel<paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>

Well, we don't need a do_compile since that's just a smaller copy of 
base_do_compile :)

>
>>> +do_install() {
>>> +        oe_runmake install
>>> +}
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation

Re: [PATCH] mrouted-3.9.4: intitial recipe

[Tom Rini]

On 03/04/2011 10:34 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 03/04/2011 05:14 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> Am Freitag, den 04.03.2011, 07:40 -0800 schrieb Khem Raj:
>>> On 3/4/2011 5:12 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter<obi@opendreambox.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> This was only compile-tested. It would be nice to get some feedback.
>>>
>>> Looks ok to me. Does it need any deps? May be building it from scratch
>>> will detect it if not otherwise
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Khem Raj<raj.khem@gmail.com>
>>
>> With the dependencies addressed and …
>
> Other than using bison, there are no dependencies that I know of.
> Binutils already depends on bison, so it's always available to cross
> recipes. Should it be mentioned in mrouted explicitly, or is this a case
> like binutils, gcc and libc, which never need to be mentioned in DEPENDS?

You should always spell out bison-native and flex-native.

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation

Re: [PATCH] mrouted-3.9.4: intitial recipe

[Phil Blundell]

On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 18:34 +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> Other than using bison, there are no dependencies that I know of.
> Binutils already depends on bison, so it's always available to cross
> recipes.

That's not something you should rely on, for at least three reasons:

a) if an external toolchain is in use then the bison dependency might
not exist; or

b) future versions of binutils, or binutils-equivalents on some
particular targets, might not require bison anymore; or, last but most
significantly...

c) in a future utopia of per-recipe dynamic sysroots, the fact that some
previously-built package DEPENDed on bison-native won't necessarily mean
it is available to you.  The only things whose existence you can rely on
are the ones you mention in your own DEPENDS, and the ones that those
packages in turn have as RDEPENDS (and so on).

p.

Re: [PATCH] mrouted-3.9.4: intitial recipe

[Andreas Oberritter]

On 03/04/2011 07:45 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 03/04/2011 09:14 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> Am Freitag, den 04.03.2011, 07:40 -0800 schrieb Khem Raj:
>>> On 3/4/2011 5:12 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter<obi@opendreambox.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> This was only compile-tested. It would be nice to get some feedback.
>>>
>>> Looks ok to me. Does it need any deps? May be building it from scratch
>>> will detect it if not otherwise
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Khem Raj<raj.khem@gmail.com>
>>
>> With the dependencies addressed and …
>>
>>>>    recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>    create mode 100644 recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
>>>> b/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..4ba4111
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/recipes/mrouted/mrouted_3.9.4.bb
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
>>>> +DESCRIPTION = "DVMRP multicast routing daemon"
>>>> +HOMEPAGE = "http://troglobit.com/mrouted.shtml"
>>>> +SECTION = "network"
>>>> +LICENSE = "BSD"
>>>> +
>>>> +SRC_URI =
>>>> "ftp://ftp.vmlinux.org/pub/People/jocke/mrouted/mrouted-${PV}.tar.bz2"
>>>> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "688b74fc42919d588f262e6b3c9c6d4c"
>>>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
>>>> "c697549b2e506a380575f7adb67e87288ef2295b97241b3a1aeb0e88b827a3e1"
>>>> +
>>>> +EXTRA_OEMAKE = " \
>>>> +        datadir=${datadir} \
>>>> +        mandir=${mandir} \
>>>> +        prefix=${prefix} \
>>>> +        sysconfdir=${sysconfdir} \
>>>> +        DESTDIR=${D} \
>>>> +"
>>>> +
>>>> +do_compile() {
>>>> +        oe_runmake
>>>> +}
>>
>> … add a blank line (?) this is
>>
>> Acked-by: Paul Menzel<paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
> 
> Well, we don't need a do_compile since that's just a smaller copy of
> base_do_compile :)

Right. How about adding base_do_install with similar semantics? With
packaged staging, can any recipe be useful without an install rule?

>>>> +do_install() {
>>>> +        oe_runmake install
>>>> +}