Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 04/03/2011 04:09 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 04/03/2011 05:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 04/03/2011 12:59 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> Hi Avi,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>  wrote:
>>> >>  Note that this is a development prototype for the time being: 
>>> there's no
>>> >>  networking support and no graphics support, amongst other missing
>>> >>  essentials.
>>> >
>>> >  Mind posting a roadmap?  I would put smp support near the top.  
>>> This sort of
>>> >  thing has to be designed in, otherwise you wind up with a big 
>>> lock like
>>> >  qemu.
>>>
>>> What are the pain points with qemu at the moment?
>>
>> It's an ugly gooball.
>
> Because it solves a lot of very difficult problems.
>
> You could drop all of the TCG support and it'd still be an ugly gooball.
>
> Supporting lots of different emulated hardware devices, live 
> migration, tons of different types of networking and image formats, 
> etc., all adds up over time.

Sure, any succcesful project becomes an ugly gooball.  It's almost a 
compliment.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function