From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: "Basheer, Mansoor Ahamed" <mansoor.ahamed@ti.com>,
"Saxena, Parth" <parth.saxena@ti.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mtd: nand: Fix bad block identification issue
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:03:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBAFD79.4000004@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304099084.2737.59.camel@localhost>
On 4/29/2011 10:44 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 19:52 +0530, Saxena, Parth wrote:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Artem Bityutskiy [mailto:dedekind1@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:01 PM
>>> To: Saxena, Parth; Brian Norris
>>> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Basheer, Mansoor Ahamed; linux-
>>> omap@vger.kernel.org
>>> Subject: Re: [RFC] mtd: nand: Fix bad block identification issue
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 17:39 +0530, Saxena, Parth wrote:
>>>> This patch solves the above issue for omap by initialising
>>>> badblockbits. We are working further on this to find a generic fix
>>>> to the problem in nand_base.c.
>>>
>>> But it looks like the generic solution is to return the line which was
>>> accidentally removed, how about this patch
>>>
>>> From: Artem Bityutskiy<Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:26:59 +0300
>>> Subject: [PATCH] mtd: return badblockbits back
>>>
>>> In commit c7b28e25cb9beb943aead770ff14551b55fa8c79 the initialization of
>>> the backblockbits was accidentally removed. This patch returns it back,
>>> because otherwise some NAND drivers are broken.
>>>
>>> This problem was reported by "Saxena, Parth<parth.saxena@ti.com>" here:
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-April/035221.html
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Saxena, Parth<parth.saxena@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy<Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
>>> Cc: stable@kernel.org [2.6.36+]
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
>>> index 15510f2..5a7f817 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
>>> @@ -3106,6 +3106,8 @@ ident_done:
>>> chip->chip_shift += 32 - 1;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + chip->badblockbits = 8;
>>> +
>>> /* Set the bad block position */
>>> if (mtd->writesize> 512 || (busw& NAND_BUSWIDTH_16))
>>> chip->badblockpos = NAND_LARGE_BADBLOCK_POS;
>> [Saxena, Parth]
>>
>> Tested-By: Saxena, Parth<parth.saxena@ti.com>
>> Acked By: Saxena, Parth<parth.saxena@ti.com>
>
> Thanks, pushing to the l2-mtd-2.6.git.
>
As promised (but too late?):
Acked-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: "Basheer, Mansoor Ahamed" <mansoor.ahamed@ti.com>,
"Saxena, Parth" <parth.saxena@ti.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mtd: nand: Fix bad block identification issue
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:03:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBAFD79.4000004@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304099084.2737.59.camel@localhost>
On 4/29/2011 10:44 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 19:52 +0530, Saxena, Parth wrote:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Artem Bityutskiy [mailto:dedekind1@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:01 PM
>>> To: Saxena, Parth; Brian Norris
>>> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Basheer, Mansoor Ahamed; linux-
>>> omap@vger.kernel.org
>>> Subject: Re: [RFC] mtd: nand: Fix bad block identification issue
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 17:39 +0530, Saxena, Parth wrote:
>>>> This patch solves the above issue for omap by initialising
>>>> badblockbits. We are working further on this to find a generic fix
>>>> to the problem in nand_base.c.
>>>
>>> But it looks like the generic solution is to return the line which was
>>> accidentally removed, how about this patch
>>>
>>> From: Artem Bityutskiy<Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:26:59 +0300
>>> Subject: [PATCH] mtd: return badblockbits back
>>>
>>> In commit c7b28e25cb9beb943aead770ff14551b55fa8c79 the initialization of
>>> the backblockbits was accidentally removed. This patch returns it back,
>>> because otherwise some NAND drivers are broken.
>>>
>>> This problem was reported by "Saxena, Parth<parth.saxena@ti.com>" here:
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-April/035221.html
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Saxena, Parth<parth.saxena@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy<Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
>>> Cc: stable@kernel.org [2.6.36+]
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
>>> index 15510f2..5a7f817 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
>>> @@ -3106,6 +3106,8 @@ ident_done:
>>> chip->chip_shift += 32 - 1;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + chip->badblockbits = 8;
>>> +
>>> /* Set the bad block position */
>>> if (mtd->writesize> 512 || (busw& NAND_BUSWIDTH_16))
>>> chip->badblockpos = NAND_LARGE_BADBLOCK_POS;
>> [Saxena, Parth]
>>
>> Tested-By: Saxena, Parth<parth.saxena@ti.com>
>> Acked By: Saxena, Parth<parth.saxena@ti.com>
>
> Thanks, pushing to the l2-mtd-2.6.git.
>
As promised (but too late?):
Acked-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-27 12:09 [RFC] mtd: nand: Fix bad block identification issue Saxena, Parth
2011-04-27 12:09 ` Saxena, Parth
2011-04-27 15:45 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2011-04-27 15:45 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2011-04-28 0:45 ` Brian Norris
2011-04-28 0:45 ` Brian Norris
2011-04-28 17:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-28 17:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-29 13:12 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-29 13:12 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-29 14:22 ` Saxena, Parth
2011-04-29 14:22 ` Saxena, Parth
2011-04-29 17:44 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-29 17:44 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-29 18:03 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2011-04-29 18:03 ` Brian Norris
2011-04-29 18:05 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-29 18:05 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DBAFD79.4000004@gmail.com \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mansoor.ahamed@ti.com \
--cc=parth.saxena@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.