All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: at_hdmac: pause: no need to wait for FIFO empty
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:05:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC929EC.6040706@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DC927DF.1060808@ru.mvista.com>

Le 10/05/2011 13:56, Sergei Shtylyov :
> Hello.
> 
> On 09-05-2011 20:11, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> 
>> The addition of the pause feature to atc_control an active wait was
>> introduced
>> to check the FIFO empty event.
> 
>    Couldn't parse this -- did you forget "with"at the start of the
> statement?

Absolutely. A comma can also improve things... is it better like this?

"
With the addition of the "pause" feature, an active wait loop was
introduced to check the "FIFO empty" event.
"

Vinod, tell me if you want me to send a new patch.

>> This event was not always happening and
>> a timout contition was needed.
>> But, in some cases, this event depend on the peripheral connected to the
>> channel that is paused: FIFO becomes empty if the peripheral consumes
>> data.
>> The timeout is pretty difficult to evaluate. Moreover, this check is not
>> needed.
>> In conclusion, it seems sensible to entirely remove the checking of
>> "FIFO empty" status when pausing.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre<nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> 
> WBR, Sergei

Thanks, best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>, vinod.koul@intel.com
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: at_hdmac: pause: no need to wait for FIFO empty
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:05:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC929EC.6040706@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DC927DF.1060808@ru.mvista.com>

Le 10/05/2011 13:56, Sergei Shtylyov :
> Hello.
> 
> On 09-05-2011 20:11, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> 
>> The addition of the pause feature to atc_control an active wait was
>> introduced
>> to check the FIFO empty event.
> 
>    Couldn't parse this -- did you forget "with"at the start of the
> statement?

Absolutely. A comma can also improve things... is it better like this?

"
With the addition of the "pause" feature, an active wait loop was
introduced to check the "FIFO empty" event.
"

Vinod, tell me if you want me to send a new patch.

>> This event was not always happening and
>> a timout contition was needed.
>> But, in some cases, this event depend on the peripheral connected to the
>> channel that is paused: FIFO becomes empty if the peripheral consumes
>> data.
>> The timeout is pretty difficult to evaluate. Moreover, this check is not
>> needed.
>> In conclusion, it seems sensible to entirely remove the checking of
>> "FIFO empty" status when pausing.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre<nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> 
> WBR, Sergei

Thanks, best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-10 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-04 18:14 [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: at_hdmac: set residue as total len in atc_tx_status Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-04 18:14 ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-04 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: at_hdmac: implement pause and resume in atc_control Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-04 18:14   ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-07 18:05   ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-07 18:05     ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-06 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: at_hdmac: set residue as total len in atc_tx_status Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-06 17:56   ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-06 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dmaengine: at_hdmac: implement pause and resume in atc_control Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-06 17:56   ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-06 16:56   ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-06 16:56     ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-09 16:11   ` [PATCH] dmaengine: at_hdmac: pause: no need to wait for FIFO empty Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-09 16:11     ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-10 11:56     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-05-10 11:56       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-05-10 12:05       ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2011-05-10 12:05         ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-11 16:53         ` Koul, Vinod
2011-05-11 16:53           ` Koul, Vinod
2011-05-12  8:28     ` Koul, Vinod
2011-05-12  8:28       ` Koul, Vinod
2011-05-12  9:20       ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-12  9:20         ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-06 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] dmaengine: at_hdmac: use descriptor chaining help function Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-06 17:56   ` Nicolas Ferre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DC929EC.6040706@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.