Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates

[Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>]

09:02, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> writes:
>=20
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> The for-linus branch of the btrfs unstable tree:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.g=
it for-linus
>=20
>>
>> Has our current queue of fixes.  Josef's is the biggest pile, mostly=
 in
>> the allocator.  Josef and I both managed to merge his patch to avoid
>> mapping the extent buffer if skip_locking was set, git merge is just=
 a
>> little too easy sometimes (I double checked the resulting code).
>=20
> The new in 3.0 btrfs warnings on every build are still there:
>=20
> fs/btrfs/sysfs.c:76: warning: =E2=80=98btrfs_root_attrs=E2=80=99 defi=
ned but not used
> fs/btrfs/sysfs.c:97: warning: =E2=80=98btrfs_super_attrs=E2=80=99 def=
ined but not used
> fs/btrfs/sysfs.c:153: warning: =E2=80=98btrfs_super_release=E2=80=99 =
defined but not used  =20
> fs/btrfs/sysfs.c:160: warning: =E2=80=98btrfs_root_release=E2=80=99 d=
efined but not used
>=20
> These are not even used inside any ifdef. It's unclear to me: were
> these supposed to be used or removed?
>=20
> Probably better to remove since they seem to be untested, unless
> it was a merge error?
>=20