* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870
@ 2011-06-16 9:18 Jakub Nowacki
2011-06-16 10:37 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Nowacki @ 2011-06-16 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xenomai help
On 16 June 2011 08:01, Gilles Chanteperdrix
<gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 10:43 PM, Jakub Nowacki wrote:
>> On 15/06/2011 17:51, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 06/15/2011 06:21 PM, Jakub Nowacki wrote:
>>>> I have SMI workaround switched on.
>>>
>>> Have you verified that the your chipset is supported by SMI workaround?
>>> http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/Configuring_x86_kernels#In_case_of_high_latencies
>>>
>> Indeed, it's not on, nothing SMI-related shown in Krenel's log. I've
>> found that my LPC is 'Intel Corporation 5 Series Chipset LPC Interface
>> Controller (rev 06)' (full lspci log is enclosed for a reference).
>
> You should use lspci -n in order to get the numerical ids.
Yes, I noticed that after I went home and looked into the log. 'lspci
-nn' gives:
00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 5 Series Chipset LPC
Interface Controller [8086:3b0a] (rev 06)
BTW the above wiki entry is slightly misleading because it suggest
'lspci -vv', whereas, if you want the actual numerical IDs you need
the -n or -nn option.
Cheers,
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-16 9:18 [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 Jakub Nowacki @ 2011-06-16 10:37 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-17 14:05 ` Jakub Nowacki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-16 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jakub Nowacki; +Cc: Xenomai help On 06/16/2011 11:18 AM, Jakub Nowacki wrote: > On 16 June 2011 08:01, Gilles Chanteperdrix > <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> wrote: >> On 06/15/2011 10:43 PM, Jakub Nowacki wrote: >>> On 15/06/2011 17:51, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>> On 06/15/2011 06:21 PM, Jakub Nowacki wrote: >>>>> I have SMI workaround switched on. >>>> >>>> Have you verified that the your chipset is supported by SMI workaround? >>>> http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/Configuring_x86_kernels#In_case_of_high_latencies >>>> >>> Indeed, it's not on, nothing SMI-related shown in Krenel's log. I've >>> found that my LPC is 'Intel Corporation 5 Series Chipset LPC Interface >>> Controller (rev 06)' (full lspci log is enclosed for a reference). >> >> You should use lspci -n in order to get the numerical ids. > > Yes, I noticed that after I went home and looked into the log. 'lspci > -nn' gives: > > 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 5 Series Chipset LPC > Interface Controller [8086:3b0a] (rev 06) > > BTW the above wiki entry is slightly misleading because it suggest > 'lspci -vv', whereas, if you want the actual numerical IDs you need > the -n or -nn option. wiki updated. Thanks. -- Gilles. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-16 10:37 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-17 14:05 ` Jakub Nowacki 2011-06-17 19:00 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Jakub Nowacki @ 2011-06-17 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gilles Chanteperdrix; +Cc: Xenomai help [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 381 bytes --] > > > I've added my ID to the table in smi.c file as: {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_5_3400_SERIES_LPC_MIN+0xa)} Everything complies OK but during the startup I get message: [ 2.137733] Xenomai: SMI-enabled chipset found [ 2.137744] Xenomai: SMI workaround failed! Should I do something extra apart from adding it to the table? Best wishes, Jakub [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 754 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-17 14:05 ` Jakub Nowacki @ 2011-06-17 19:00 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-17 19:44 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-17 19:48 ` Jakub Nowacki 0 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-17 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jakub Nowacki; +Cc: Xenomai help On 06/17/2011 04:05 PM, Jakub Nowacki wrote: >> >> >> I've added my ID to the table in smi.c file as: > > {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, > PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_5_3400_SERIES_LPC_MIN+0xa)} > > Everything complies OK but during the startup I get message: > > [ 2.137733] Xenomai: SMI-enabled chipset found > [ 2.137744] Xenomai: SMI workaround failed! > > Should I do something extra apart from adding it to the table? There are two reasons why it may not work: - the way to globally disable SMIs has changed with the chipset version you are using; - the BIOS of your PC locks the SMI disabling bit. So, the next step is to check the chipset datasheet. -- Gilles. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-17 19:00 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-17 19:44 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-17 19:52 ` Jakub Nowacki 2011-06-17 19:48 ` Jakub Nowacki 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-17 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jakub Nowacki; +Cc: Xenomai help On 06/17/2011 09:00 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 06/17/2011 04:05 PM, Jakub Nowacki wrote: >>> >>> >>> I've added my ID to the table in smi.c file as: >> >> {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, >> PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_5_3400_SERIES_LPC_MIN+0xa)} >> >> Everything complies OK but during the startup I get message: >> >> [ 2.137733] Xenomai: SMI-enabled chipset found >> [ 2.137744] Xenomai: SMI workaround failed! >> >> Should I do something extra apart from adding it to the table? > > There are two reasons why it may not work: > - the way to globally disable SMIs has changed with the chipset version > you are using; > - the BIOS of your PC locks the SMI disabling bit. > > So, the next step is to check the chipset datasheet. >From your first mail, the chipset you use is a Q57, the datasheet says that the GLB_SMI_EN is still there. So, what you should do is check whether the SMI_LOCK bit is set. The following (untested) patch should print the lock bit value: diff --git a/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c b/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c index d80b14b..97e6774 100644 --- a/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c +++ b/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c @@ -157,7 +157,8 @@ void rthal_smi_disable(void) mask_bits(rthal_smi_masked_bits, rthal_smi_en_addr); if (inl(rthal_smi_en_addr) & rthal_smi_masked_bits) - printk("Xenomai: SMI workaround failed!\n"); + printk("Xenomai: SMI workaround failed!, BIOS lock: d\n", + !!(inl(rthal_smi_en_addr + 0xA0 - SMI_CTRL_ADDR) & (1 << 4))); else printk("Xenomai: SMI workaround enabled\n"); > -- Gilles. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-17 19:44 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-17 19:52 ` Jakub Nowacki 2011-06-18 15:17 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Jakub Nowacki @ 2011-06-17 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gilles Chanteperdrix; +Cc: Xenomai help On 17/06/2011 20:44, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 06/17/2011 09:00 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> On 06/17/2011 04:05 PM, Jakub Nowacki wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> I've added my ID to the table in smi.c file as: >>> >>> {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, >>> PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_5_3400_SERIES_LPC_MIN+0xa)} >>> >>> Everything complies OK but during the startup I get message: >>> >>> [ 2.137733] Xenomai: SMI-enabled chipset found >>> [ 2.137744] Xenomai: SMI workaround failed! >>> >>> Should I do something extra apart from adding it to the table? >> >> There are two reasons why it may not work: >> - the way to globally disable SMIs has changed with the chipset version >> you are using; >> - the BIOS of your PC locks the SMI disabling bit. >> >> So, the next step is to check the chipset datasheet. > > From your first mail, the chipset you use is a Q57, the datasheet says > that the GLB_SMI_EN is still there. So, what you should do is check > whether the SMI_LOCK bit is set. The following (untested) patch should > print the lock bit value: > > diff --git a/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c b/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c > index d80b14b..97e6774 100644 > --- a/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c > +++ b/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c > @@ -157,7 +157,8 @@ void rthal_smi_disable(void) > mask_bits(rthal_smi_masked_bits, rthal_smi_en_addr); > > if (inl(rthal_smi_en_addr)& rthal_smi_masked_bits) > - printk("Xenomai: SMI workaround failed!\n"); > + printk("Xenomai: SMI workaround failed!, BIOS lock: d\n", > + !!(inl(rthal_smi_en_addr + 0xA0 - SMI_CTRL_ADDR)& (1<< 4))); > else > printk("Xenomai: SMI workaround enabled\n"); > You were faster. Thanks! Sorry for slight cross posting. I have this machine at work so I probably test it on Monday. Cheers, Jakub ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-17 19:52 ` Jakub Nowacki @ 2011-06-18 15:17 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-20 14:34 ` Jakub Nowacki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-18 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jakub Nowacki; +Cc: Xenomai help On 06/17/2011 09:52 PM, Jakub Nowacki wrote: > > > On 17/06/2011 20:44, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> On 06/17/2011 09:00 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> On 06/17/2011 04:05 PM, Jakub Nowacki wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I've added my ID to the table in smi.c file as: >>>> >>>> {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, >>>> PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_5_3400_SERIES_LPC_MIN+0xa)} >>>> >>>> Everything complies OK but during the startup I get message: >>>> >>>> [ 2.137733] Xenomai: SMI-enabled chipset found >>>> [ 2.137744] Xenomai: SMI workaround failed! >>>> >>>> Should I do something extra apart from adding it to the table? >>> >>> There are two reasons why it may not work: >>> - the way to globally disable SMIs has changed with the chipset version >>> you are using; >>> - the BIOS of your PC locks the SMI disabling bit. >>> >>> So, the next step is to check the chipset datasheet. >> >> From your first mail, the chipset you use is a Q57, the datasheet says >> that the GLB_SMI_EN is still there. So, what you should do is check >> whether the SMI_LOCK bit is set. The following (untested) patch should >> print the lock bit value: >> >> diff --git a/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c b/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c >> index d80b14b..97e6774 100644 >> --- a/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c >> +++ b/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c >> @@ -157,7 +157,8 @@ void rthal_smi_disable(void) >> mask_bits(rthal_smi_masked_bits, rthal_smi_en_addr); >> >> if (inl(rthal_smi_en_addr)& rthal_smi_masked_bits) >> - printk("Xenomai: SMI workaround failed!\n"); >> + printk("Xenomai: SMI workaround failed!, BIOS lock: d\n", >> + !!(inl(rthal_smi_en_addr + 0xA0 - SMI_CTRL_ADDR)& (1<< 4))); >> else >> printk("Xenomai: SMI workaround enabled\n"); >> > > You were faster. Thanks! Sorry for slight cross posting. I have this > machine at work so I probably test it on Monday. The next step is to try disabling the individual bits (TC0, USB legacy, etc...), as they may not affected by the SMI_LOCK bit. -- Gilles. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-18 15:17 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-20 14:34 ` Jakub Nowacki 2011-06-20 15:02 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Jakub Nowacki @ 2011-06-20 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gilles Chanteperdrix; +Cc: Xenomai help On 18 June 2011 16:17, Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> wrote: > On 06/17/2011 09:52 PM, Jakub Nowacki wrote: >> On 17/06/2011 20:44, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> From your first mail, the chipset you use is a Q57, the datasheet says >>> that the GLB_SMI_EN is still there. So, what you should do is check >>> whether the SMI_LOCK bit is set. The following (untested) patch should >>> print the lock bit value: >>> >>> diff --git a/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c b/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c >>> index d80b14b..97e6774 100644 >>> --- a/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c >>> +++ b/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c >>> @@ -157,7 +157,8 @@ void rthal_smi_disable(void) >>> mask_bits(rthal_smi_masked_bits, rthal_smi_en_addr); >>> >>> if (inl(rthal_smi_en_addr)& rthal_smi_masked_bits) >>> - printk("Xenomai: SMI workaround failed!\n"); >>> + printk("Xenomai: SMI workaround failed!, BIOS lock: d\n", >>> + !!(inl(rthal_smi_en_addr + 0xA0 - SMI_CTRL_ADDR)& (1<< 4))); >>> else >>> printk("Xenomai: SMI workaround enabled\n"); >>> >> >> You were faster. Thanks! Sorry for slight cross posting. I have this >> machine at work so I probably test it on Monday. > > The next step is to try disabling the individual bits (TC0, USB legacy, > etc...), as they may not affected by the SMI_LOCK bit. > I've added the patch to smi.c and, as suspected, the SMI_LOCK is on, namely, kernel log looks like: [ 2.111453] Xenomai: SMI workaround failed!, BIOS lock: 1 I switched off the global SMI disable leaving the particular bits disabled and it seems to work: [ 2.121558] Xenomai: SMI-enabled chipset found [ 2.121568] Xenomai: SMI workaround enabled BTW I've found that often motherboards have SMI locked and it is not changeable in BIOS. As for latency tests it helped, I think. I did series of tests with large load (8x'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null') and the results look something like that: Latency for user task (-t0), period 100 us: RTS| -2.363| -1.936| 20.443| 0| 0| 00:30:00/00:30:00 Latency for kernel task (-t1), period 100 us: RTS| -2.924| -2.500| 12.974| 0| 0| 00:30:00/00:30:00 Latency for timer IRQ (-t2), period 100 us: RTS| -3.327| -2.970| 10.572| 0| 0| 00:30:00/00:30:00 Interestingly, I'm getting the same results for core2 kernel without SMI workaround working. I was just getting high latencies approx. 70 us for generic kernel. I'm not sure though how is it possible. Also, the higher latencies of above 10 us are arriving not too often but relatively regularly (without any visible pattern, though). I'm not sure if such a latencies are rather normal or caused by something 'bad'. Moreover, I seem not be able to do switch test; when I run it I'm getting: == Testing FPU check routines... r0: 1 != 2 r1: 1 != 2 r2: 1 != 2 r3: 1 != 2 r4: 1 != 2 r5: 1 != 2 r6: 1 != 2 r7: 1 != 2 == FPU check routines: OK. ioctl(RTTST_RTIOC_SWTEST_CREATE_KTASK): Cannot allocate memory == Threads: sleeper_ufps0-0 rtk0-1 rtk0-2 rtk_fp0-3 rtk_fp0-4 rtk_fp_ufpp0-5 rtk_fp_ufpp0-6 rtup0-7 rtup0-8 rtup_ufpp0-9 rtup_ufpp0-10 rtus0-11 rtus0-12 rtus_ufps0-13 rtus_ufps0-14 rtuo0-15 rtuo0-16 rtuo_ufpp0-17 rtuo_ufpp0-18 rtuo_ufps0-19 rtuo_ufps0-20 rtuo_ufpp_ufps0-21 rtuo_ufpp_ufps0-22 sleeper_ufps1-0 rtk1-1 rtk1-2 rtk_fp1-3 rtk_fp1-4 rtk_fp_ufpp1-5 rtk_fp_ufpp1-6 rtup1-7 rtup1-8 rtup_ufpp1-9 rtup_ufpp1-10 rtus1-11 rtus1-12 rtus_ufps1-13 rtus_ufps1-14 rtuo1-15 rtuo1-16 rtuo_ufpp1-17 rtuo_ufpp1-18 rtuo_ufps1-19 rtuo_ufps1-20 rtuo_ufpp_ufps1-21 rtuo_ufpp_ufps1-22 sleeper_ufps2-0 rtk2-1 rtk2-2 rtk_fp2-3RTT| 363494:24:53 RTH|---------cpu|ctx switches|-------total RTD| 0| 0| 0 RTD| 1| 0| 0 RTD| 2| 0| 0 Thanks again for the a lot of help I received so far. Best wishes, Jakub ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-20 14:34 ` Jakub Nowacki @ 2011-06-20 15:02 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-20 15:25 ` Jakub Nowacki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-20 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jakub Nowacki; +Cc: Xenomai help On 06/20/2011 04:34 PM, Jakub Nowacki wrote: > Interestingly, I'm getting the same results for core2 kernel without > SMI workaround working. I was just getting high latencies approx. 70 > us for generic kernel. I'm not sure though how is it possible. Also, > the higher latencies of above 10 us are arriving not too often but > relatively regularly (without any visible pattern, though). I'm not > sure if such a latencies are rather normal or caused by something > 'bad'. To make proper benchmarks, you should: - let the latency run long - provide some load, you can use the dohell script in xenomai-head to generate the load. That said, having some spikes is not abnormal. The real question is to know whether the latencies your get are sufficient for your application. > ioctl(RTTST_RTIOC_SWTEST_CREATE_KTASK): Cannot allocate memory You have to increase CONFIG_XENO_OPT_SYS_STACKPOOLSZ. -- Gilles. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-20 15:02 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-20 15:25 ` Jakub Nowacki 2011-06-20 16:16 ` Philippe Gerum 2011-06-20 17:43 ` [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 Gilles Chanteperdrix 0 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jakub Nowacki @ 2011-06-20 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gilles Chanteperdrix; +Cc: Xenomai help On 06/20/2011 04:02 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > To make proper benchmarks, you should: > - let the latency run long > - provide some load, you can use the dohell script in xenomai-head to > generate the load. > I've generated a load using 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null' one for each core (8 in total), which is roughly the way how xeno-test does it. The test was running for 30 min, which is not very long but I should see the long latencies by that time, I think at least. > That said, having some spikes is not abnormal. The real question is to > know whether the latencies your get are sufficient for your application. > Well, I think it should be OK for peak latencies < 20 us, that is what I'm getting now. >> ioctl(RTTST_RTIOC_SWTEST_CREATE_KTASK): Cannot allocate memory > > You have to increase CONFIG_XENO_OPT_SYS_STACKPOOLSZ. > It is 128 Kb now. Should it be more? Is there any (thumb) rule for this value? Best wishes, Jakub ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-20 15:25 ` Jakub Nowacki @ 2011-06-20 16:16 ` Philippe Gerum 2011-06-20 17:34 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-20 17:43 ` [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 Gilles Chanteperdrix 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Philippe Gerum @ 2011-06-20 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jakub Nowacki; +Cc: Xenomai help On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 16:25 +0100, Jakub Nowacki wrote: > On 06/20/2011 04:02 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > To make proper benchmarks, you should: > > - let the latency run long > > - provide some load, you can use the dohell script in xenomai-head to > > generate the load. > > > I've generated a load using 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null' one for each > core (8 in total), which is roughly the way how xeno-test does it. The > test was running for 30 min, which is not very long but I should see the > long latencies by that time, I think at least. > > > That said, having some spikes is not abnormal. The real question is to > > know whether the latencies your get are sufficient for your application. > > > Well, I think it should be OK for peak latencies < 20 us, that is what > I'm getting now. > > >> ioctl(RTTST_RTIOC_SWTEST_CREATE_KTASK): Cannot allocate memory > > > > You have to increase CONFIG_XENO_OPT_SYS_STACKPOOLSZ. > > > It is 128 Kb now. Should it be more? Is there any (thumb) rule for this > value? Max # of concurrent kernel-based Xenomai threads x stack_size. 8k stack minimum is a safe bet for x86_64. Typically, RTDM (driver) tasks in kernel space are Xenomai ones, so you would need to reserve stack space for each of them in this amount. The switchtest driver is RTDM-based, and may run a number of RTDM tasks, depending on the test scenario. > > Best wishes, > > Jakub > > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai-help mailing list > Xenomai-help@domain.hid > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help -- Philippe. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-20 16:16 ` Philippe Gerum @ 2011-06-20 17:34 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-20 21:30 ` Jakub Nowacki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-20 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philippe Gerum; +Cc: Xenomai help On 06/20/2011 06:16 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 16:25 +0100, Jakub Nowacki wrote: >> On 06/20/2011 04:02 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> To make proper benchmarks, you should: >>> - let the latency run long >>> - provide some load, you can use the dohell script in xenomai-head to >>> generate the load. >>> >> I've generated a load using 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null' one for each >> core (8 in total), which is roughly the way how xeno-test does it. The >> test was running for 30 min, which is not very long but I should see the >> long latencies by that time, I think at least. >> >>> That said, having some spikes is not abnormal. The real question is to >>> know whether the latencies your get are sufficient for your application. >>> >> Well, I think it should be OK for peak latencies < 20 us, that is what >> I'm getting now. >> >>>> ioctl(RTTST_RTIOC_SWTEST_CREATE_KTASK): Cannot allocate memory >>> >>> You have to increase CONFIG_XENO_OPT_SYS_STACKPOOLSZ. >>> >> It is 128 Kb now. Should it be more? Is there any (thumb) rule for this >> value? > > Max # of concurrent kernel-based Xenomai threads x stack_size. 8k stack > minimum is a safe bet for x86_64. > > Typically, RTDM (driver) tasks in kernel space are Xenomai ones, so you > would need to reserve stack space for each of them in this amount. > > The switchtest driver is RTDM-based, and may run a number of RTDM tasks, > depending on the test scenario. The default scenario being to run 6 rtdm tasks by cpu (that would make 48 on an 8 cores processor). -- Gilles. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-20 17:34 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-20 21:30 ` Jakub Nowacki 2011-06-20 22:54 ` [Xenomai-help] Xenomai beagleboard xm ethernet not working David Wiebe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Jakub Nowacki @ 2011-06-20 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gilles Chanteperdrix; +Cc: Xenomai help On 20/06/2011 18:34, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 06/20/2011 06:16 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 16:25 +0100, Jakub Nowacki wrote: >>> On 06/20/2011 04:02 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>> You have to increase CONFIG_XENO_OPT_SYS_STACKPOOLSZ. >>>> >>> It is 128 Kb now. Should it be more? Is there any (thumb) rule for this >>> value? >> >> Max # of concurrent kernel-based Xenomai threads x stack_size. 8k stack >> minimum is a safe bet for x86_64. >> >> Typically, RTDM (driver) tasks in kernel space are Xenomai ones, so you >> would need to reserve stack space for each of them in this amount. >> >> The switchtest driver is RTDM-based, and may run a number of RTDM tasks, >> depending on the test scenario. > > The default scenario being to run 6 rtdm tasks by cpu (that would make > 48 on an 8 cores processor). > Thanks for the explanation. I've changed the stack pool size to 512kb, which is slightly more then minimum, and it allowed the test to run. As for the tests, I don't think I have to be more pessimistic in it. I have to (finally) do some lab testing, which would potentially reveal some problems. Nonetheless, thanks for the suggestions. Cheers, Jakub ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Xenomai-help] Xenomai beagleboard xm ethernet not working 2011-06-20 21:30 ` Jakub Nowacki @ 2011-06-20 22:54 ` David Wiebe 2011-06-21 6:54 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: David Wiebe @ 2011-06-20 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xenomai Hello, I haven't been able to get the ethernet to work with linux 2.6.35.9 patched with Xenomai. I've been in menuconfig turning on anything and everything related to networking and usb and still nothing. David ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai beagleboard xm ethernet not working 2011-06-20 22:54 ` [Xenomai-help] Xenomai beagleboard xm ethernet not working David Wiebe @ 2011-06-21 6:54 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-21 8:18 ` David Wiebe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-21 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Wiebe; +Cc: xenomai On 06/21/2011 12:54 AM, David Wiebe wrote: > Hello, > > I haven't been able to get the ethernet to work with linux 2.6.35.9 > patched with Xenomai. I've been in menuconfig turning on anything and > everything related to networking and usb and still nothing. If you disable CONFIG_XENOMAI and CONFIG_IPIPE in the kernel configuration, does ethernet work? -- Gilles. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai beagleboard xm ethernet not working 2011-06-21 6:54 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-21 8:18 ` David Wiebe 2011-06-21 8:38 ` [Xenomai-help] Xenomai beagleboard xm ethernet working! David Wiebe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: David Wiebe @ 2011-06-21 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gilles Chanteperdrix; +Cc: xenomai On 11-06-20 11:54 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 06/21/2011 12:54 AM, David Wiebe wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I haven't been able to get the ethernet to work with linux 2.6.35.9 >> patched with Xenomai. I've been in menuconfig turning on anything and >> everything related to networking and usb and still nothing. > If you disable CONFIG_XENOMAI and CONFIG_IPIPE in the kernel > configuration, does ethernet work? > Hi Gilles, I've got the usb ethernet interface up. I can ping it from my pc. The beagleboard hangs. I'm investigating. I've used the usb ethernet adaptor successfully many times with the bbc4 so I doubt its the problem. Here's the serial output dump *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment In: serial Out: serial Err: serial Beagle Rev C4 timed out in wait_for_pin: I2C_STAT=0 No EEPROM on expansion board Die ID #5484000400000000040373050d00801d Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 reading boot.scr ** Unable to read "boot.scr" from mmc 0:1 ** reading uImage 2272764 bytes read Booting from mmc ... ## Booting kernel from Legacy Image at 82000000 ... Image Name: Linux-2.6.35.9-ipipe Image Type: ARM Linux Kernel Image (uncompressed) Data Size: 2272700 Bytes = 2.2 MiB Load Address: 80008000 Entry Point: 80008000 Verifying Checksum ... OK Loading Kernel Image ... OK OK Starting kernel ... Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel. Linux version 2.6.35.9-ipipe (david@domain.hid) (gc1 CPU: ARMv7 Processor [411fc083] revision 3 (ARMv7), cr=10c53c7f CPU: VIPT nonaliasing data cache, VIPT nonaliasing instruction ca Memory policy: ECC disabled, Data cache writeback OMAP3430/3530 ES3.1 (l2cache iva sgx neon isp ) SRAM: Mapped pa 0x40200000 to va 0xfe400000 size: 0x100000r, mobility groupi4 Kernel command line: console=ttyS2,115200n8 mpurate=720 vram=12M omapfb.modet PID hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) Memory: 128MB 128MB = 256MB total Memory: 255148k/255148k available, 6996k reserved, 0K highmem Virtual kernel memory layout: vector : 0xffff0000 - 0xffff1000 ( 4 kB) fixmap : 0xfff00000 - 0xfffe0000 ( 896 kB) DMA : 0xffc00000 - 0xffe00000 ( 2 MB) vmalloc : 0xd0800000 - 0xf8000000 ( 632 MB) lowmem : 0xc0000000 - 0xd0000000 ( 256 MB) modules : 0xbf000000 - 0xc0000000 ( 16 MB) .init : 0xc0008000 - 0xc0029000 ( 132 kB) .text : 0xc0029000 - 0xc0411000 (4000 kB) .data : 0xc042c000 - 0xc0466d80 ( 236 kB) Hierarchical RCU implementation. Verbose stalled-CPUs detection is disabled. NR_IRQS:402 Clocking rate (Crystal/Core/MPU): 26.0/332/500 MHz omap_hwmod: l3_hwmod: cannot be enabled (3) omap_hwmod: l4_core_hwmod: cannot be enabled (3) omap_hwmod: l4_per_hwmod: cannot be enabled (3) omap_hwmod: l4_wkup_hwmod: cannot be enabled (3) Reprogramming SDRC clock to 332000000 Hz GPMC revision 5.0 IRQ: Found an INTC at 0xfa200000 (revision 4.0) with 96 interrupts Total of 96 interrupts on 1 active controller OMAP GPIO hardware version 2.5 OMAP clockevent source: GPTIMER2 at 13000000 Hz I-pipe, 13.000 MHz clocksource I-pipe 1.18-01: pipeline enabled. Console: colour dummy device 80x30 Calibrating delay loop... 498.07 BogoMIPS (lpj=2490368) pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301 Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 CPU: Testing write buffer coherency: ok regulator: core version 0.5 NET: Registered protocol family 16 Using McSPI for SPI Found NAND on CS0 Registering NAND on CS0 Unable to get DVI reset GPIO Switched to new clocking rate (Crystal/Core/MPU): 26.0/720/332 MHz OMAP DMA hardware revision 4.0 bio: create slab <bio-0> at 0 SCSI subsystem initialized usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs usbcore: registered new interface driver hub usbcore: registered n2c_omap.1: bus 1 rev3.12 at 2600 kHz twl4030: PIH (irq 7) chaining IRQs 368..375 twl4030: power (irq 373) chaining IRQs 376..383 twl4030: gpio (irq 368) chaining IRQs 384..401 regulator: VUSB1V5: 1500 mV normal standby regulator: VUSB1V8: 1800 mV normal standby regulator: VUSB3V1: 3100 mV normal standby twl4030_usb twl4030_usb: Initialized TWL4030 USB module regulator: VMMC1: 1850 <--> 3150 mV at 3000 mV normal standby regulator: VDAC: 1800 mV normal standby regulator: VDVI: 1800 mV normal standby regulator: VSIM: 1800 <--> 3000 mV at 1800 mV normal standby i2c_omap i2c_omap.3: bus 3 rev3.12 at 100 kHz Switching to clocksource ipipe_tsc musb_hdrc: version 6.0, musb-dma, otg (peripheral+host), debug=0 musb_hdrc musb_hdrc: USB OTG mode controller at fa0ab000 using DMA, IRQ 92 NET: Registered protocol family 2 IP route cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 1, 8192 bytes) TCP established hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) TCP bind hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) TCP: Hash tables configured (established 8192 bind 8192) TCP reno registered UDP hash table entries: 256 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) UDP-Lite hash table entries: 256 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) NET: Registered protocol family 1 RPC: Registered udp transport module. RPC: Registered tcp transport module. RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 backchannel transport module. NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.97 (double precision) I-pipe: Domain Xenomai registered. Xenomai: hal/arm started. Xenomai: scheduling class idle registered. Xenomai: scheduling class rt registered. Xenomai: real-time nucleus v2.5.6 (Wormhole Wizards) loaded. Xenomai: starting native API services. Xenomai: starting POSIX services. Xenomai: starting RTDM services. VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.2 Dquot-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order 0, 4096 bytes) JFFS2 version 2.2. (NAND) �© 2001-2006 Red Hat, Inc. msgmni has been set to 498 alg: No test for stdrng (krng) io scheduler noop registered io scheduler deadline registered io scheduler cfq registered (default) Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled serial8250.0: ttyS0 at MMIO 0x4806a000 (irq = 72) is a ST16654 serial8250.1: ttyS1 at MMIO 0x4806c000 (irq = 73) is a ST16654 serial8250.2: ttyS2 at MMIO 0x49020000 (irq = 74) is a ST16654 console [ttyS2] enabled brd: module loaded loop: module loaded usbcore: registered new interface driver catc catc: v2.8:CATC EL1210A NetMate USB Ethernet driver usbcore: registered new interface driver kaweth pegasus: v0.6.14 (2006/09/27), Pegasus/Pegasus II USB Ethernet driver usbcore: registered new interface driver pegasus rtl8150: v0.6.2 (2004/08/27):rtl8150 based usb-ethernet driver usbcore: registered new interface driver rtl8150 usbcore: registered new interface driver asix usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_eem usbcore: registered new interface driver dm9601 usbcore: registered new interface driver smsc75xx usbcore: registered new interface driver smsc95xx usbcore: registered new interface driver gl620a usbcore: registered new interface driver net1080 usbcore: registered new interface driver plusb usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_host usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_subset usbcore: registered new interface driver zaurus usbcore: registered new interface driver MOSCHIP usb-ethernet driver usbmon: deb USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver ehci-omap ehci-omap.0: OMAP-EHCI Host Controller ehci-omap ehci-omap.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 ehci-omap ehci-omap.0: irq 77, io mem 0x48064800 ehci-omap ehci-omap.0: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00 usb usb1: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0002 usb usb1: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1 usb usb1: Product: OMAP-EHCI Host Controller usb usb1: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.35.9-ipipe ehci_hcd usb usb1: SerialNumber: ehci-omap.0 hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 1-0:1.0: 3 ports detected Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage USB Mass Storage support registered. i2c /dev entries driver TCP cubic registered NET: Registered protocol family 17 NET: Registered protocol family 15 Power Management for TI OMAP3. VFP support v0.3: implementor 41 architecture 3 part 30 variant c rev 1 regulator_init_complete: incomplete constraints, leaving VDVI on regulator_init_complete: incomplete constraints, leaving VDAC on Waiting for root device /dev/mmcblk0p2... usb 1-2: new high speed USB device using ehci-omap and address 2 mmc0: new high speed SDHC card at address fde5 mmcblk0: mmc0:fde5 SD04G 3.69 GiB mmcblk0: p1 p2 EXT3-fs: barriers not enabled kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs (mmcblk0p2): warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck isd EXT3-fs (mmcblk0p2): using internal journal EXT3-fs (mmcblk0p2): mounted filesystem with writeback data mode VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) on device 179:2. Freeing init memory: 132K usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=0b95, idProduct=7720 usb 1-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 usb 1-2: Product: AX88772 usb 1-2: Manufacturer: ASIX Elec. Corp. usb 1-2: SerialNumber: 000001 INIT: version 2.86 booting Please wait: booting... Starting udev Illegal instruction asix 1-2:1.0: eth0: register 'asix' at usb-ehci-omap.0-2, ASIX AX88772 USB 2a Remounting root file system... Caching udev devnodes Populating dev cache ALSA: Restoring mixer settings... Configuring network interfaces... /usr/sbin/alsactl: load_state:1610: No sou. eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x41E1 udhcpc (v1.13.2) started run-parts: /etc/udhcpc.d/00avahi-autoipd exited with code 1 Sending discover... Sending select for 192.168.0.101... Lease of 192.168.0.101 obtained, lease time 10800 run-parts: /etc/udhcpc.d/00avahi-autoipd exited with code 1 adding dns 192.168.0.1 ifconfig: SIOCGIFFLAGS: No such device done. Starting portmap daemon: portmap. portmap: fork: No such deviceeth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x41E1 net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter = 1 net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter = 1 hwclock: can't open '/dev/misc/rtc': No such file or directory ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai beagleboard xm ethernet working! 2011-06-21 8:18 ` David Wiebe @ 2011-06-21 8:38 ` David Wiebe 2011-06-21 10:37 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: David Wiebe @ 2011-06-21 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xenomai Hello, In menuconfig, unselect realtime clock. lol! Boots fine, ethernet support works! I also patched the kernel to support spi which works in userland. Now to make it all work as a rtos. If anyone has suggestions or whatever, I need to work on a spi to ethernet bridge. I need to read 360bytes every 1mS and send it out over ethernet. I've done this with a non-rtos and achieved 360byte read and send every ~740uS. The problem was sometimes it would vary between 700 and 900uS etc. I need this to be isochronous and 1mS will work fine. There you have it! Cheers! David On 11-06-21 01:18 AM, David Wiebe wrote: > On 11-06-20 11:54 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> On 06/21/2011 12:54 AM, David Wiebe wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I haven't been able to get the ethernet to work with linux 2.6.35.9 >>> patched with Xenomai. I've been in menuconfig turning on anything and >>> everything related to networking and usb and still nothing. >> If you disable CONFIG_XENOMAI and CONFIG_IPIPE in the kernel >> configuration, does ethernet work? >> > Hi Gilles, > > I've got the usb ethernet interface up. I can ping it from my pc. The > beagleboard hangs. I'm investigating. I've used the usb ethernet > adaptor successfully many times with the bbc4 so I doubt its the problem. > > Here's the serial output dump > > *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment > > In: serial > Out: serial > Err: serial > Beagle Rev C4 > timed out in wait_for_pin: I2C_STAT=0 > No EEPROM on expansion board > Die ID #5484000400000000040373050d00801d > Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 > reading boot.scr > > ** Unable to read "boot.scr" from mmc 0:1 ** > reading uImage > > 2272764 bytes read > Booting from mmc ... > ## Booting kernel from Legacy Image at 82000000 ... > Image Name: Linux-2.6.35.9-ipipe > Image Type: ARM Linux Kernel Image (uncompressed) > Data Size: 2272700 Bytes = 2.2 MiB > Load Address: 80008000 > Entry Point: 80008000 > Verifying Checksum ... OK > Loading Kernel Image ... OK > OK > > Starting kernel ... > > Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel. > Linux version 2.6.35.9-ipipe > (david@domain.hid) (gc1 > CPU: ARMv7 Processor [411fc083] revision 3 (ARMv7), cr=10c53c7f > CPU: VIPT nonaliasing data cache, VIPT nonaliasing instruction ca > Memory policy: ECC disabled, Data cache writeback > OMAP3430/3530 ES3.1 (l2cache iva sgx neon isp ) > SRAM: Mapped pa 0x40200000 to va 0xfe400000 size: 0x100000r, mobility > groupi4 > Kernel command line: console=ttyS2,115200n8 mpurate=720 vram=12M > omapfb.modet > PID hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) > Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) > Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) > Memory: 128MB 128MB = 256MB total > Memory: 255148k/255148k available, 6996k reserved, 0K highmem > Virtual kernel memory layout: > vector : 0xffff0000 - 0xffff1000 ( 4 kB) > fixmap : 0xfff00000 - 0xfffe0000 ( 896 kB) > DMA : 0xffc00000 - 0xffe00000 ( 2 MB) > vmalloc : 0xd0800000 - 0xf8000000 ( 632 MB) > lowmem : 0xc0000000 - 0xd0000000 ( 256 MB) > modules : 0xbf000000 - 0xc0000000 ( 16 MB) > .init : 0xc0008000 - 0xc0029000 ( 132 kB) > .text : 0xc0029000 - 0xc0411000 (4000 kB) > .data : 0xc042c000 - 0xc0466d80 ( 236 kB) > Hierarchical RCU implementation. > Verbose stalled-CPUs detection is disabled. > NR_IRQS:402 > Clocking rate (Crystal/Core/MPU): 26.0/332/500 MHz > omap_hwmod: l3_hwmod: cannot be enabled (3) > omap_hwmod: l4_core_hwmod: cannot be enabled (3) > omap_hwmod: l4_per_hwmod: cannot be enabled (3) > omap_hwmod: l4_wkup_hwmod: cannot be enabled (3) > Reprogramming SDRC clock to 332000000 Hz > GPMC revision 5.0 > IRQ: Found an INTC at 0xfa200000 (revision 4.0) with 96 interrupts > Total of 96 interrupts on 1 active controller > OMAP GPIO hardware version 2.5 > OMAP clockevent source: GPTIMER2 at 13000000 Hz > I-pipe, 13.000 MHz clocksource > I-pipe 1.18-01: pipeline enabled. > Console: colour dummy device 80x30 > Calibrating delay loop... 498.07 BogoMIPS (lpj=2490368) > pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301 > Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 > CPU: Testing write buffer coherency: ok > regulator: core version 0.5 > NET: Registered protocol family 16 > Using McSPI for SPI > Found NAND on CS0 > Registering NAND on CS0 > Unable to get DVI reset GPIO > Switched to new clocking rate (Crystal/Core/MPU): 26.0/720/332 MHz > OMAP DMA hardware revision 4.0 > bio: create slab <bio-0> at 0 > SCSI subsystem initialized > usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs > usbcore: registered new interface driver hub > usbcore: registered n2c_omap.1: bus 1 rev3.12 at 2600 kHz > twl4030: PIH (irq 7) chaining IRQs 368..375 > twl4030: power (irq 373) chaining IRQs 376..383 > twl4030: gpio (irq 368) chaining IRQs 384..401 > regulator: VUSB1V5: 1500 mV normal standby > regulator: VUSB1V8: 1800 mV normal standby > regulator: VUSB3V1: 3100 mV normal standby > twl4030_usb twl4030_usb: Initialized TWL4030 USB module > regulator: VMMC1: 1850 <--> 3150 mV at 3000 mV normal standby > regulator: VDAC: 1800 mV normal standby > regulator: VDVI: 1800 mV normal standby > regulator: VSIM: 1800 <--> 3000 mV at 1800 mV normal standby > i2c_omap i2c_omap.3: bus 3 rev3.12 at 100 kHz > Switching to clocksource ipipe_tsc > musb_hdrc: version 6.0, musb-dma, otg (peripheral+host), debug=0 > musb_hdrc musb_hdrc: USB OTG mode controller at fa0ab000 using DMA, > IRQ 92 > NET: Registered protocol family 2 > IP route cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 1, 8192 bytes) > TCP established hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) > TCP bind hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) > TCP: Hash tables configured (established 8192 bind 8192) > TCP reno registered > UDP hash table entries: 256 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) > UDP-Lite hash table entries: 256 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) > NET: Registered protocol family 1 > RPC: Registered udp transport module. > RPC: Registered tcp transport module. > RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 backchannel transport module. > NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.97 (double precision) > I-pipe: Domain Xenomai registered. > Xenomai: hal/arm started. > Xenomai: scheduling class idle registered. > Xenomai: scheduling class rt registered. > Xenomai: real-time nucleus v2.5.6 (Wormhole Wizards) loaded. > Xenomai: starting native API services. > Xenomai: starting POSIX services. > Xenomai: starting RTDM services. > VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.2 > Dquot-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order 0, 4096 bytes) > JFFS2 version 2.2. (NAND) �© 2001-2006 Red Hat, Inc. > msgmni has been set to 498 > alg: No test for stdrng (krng) > io scheduler noop registered > io scheduler deadline registered > io scheduler cfq registered (default) > Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled > serial8250.0: ttyS0 at MMIO 0x4806a000 (irq = 72) is a ST16654 > serial8250.1: ttyS1 at MMIO 0x4806c000 (irq = 73) is a ST16654 > serial8250.2: ttyS2 at MMIO 0x49020000 (irq = 74) is a ST16654 > console [ttyS2] enabled > brd: module loaded > loop: module loaded > usbcore: registered new interface driver catc > catc: v2.8:CATC EL1210A NetMate USB Ethernet driver > usbcore: registered new interface driver kaweth > pegasus: v0.6.14 (2006/09/27), Pegasus/Pegasus II USB Ethernet driver > usbcore: registered new interface driver pegasus > rtl8150: v0.6.2 (2004/08/27):rtl8150 based usb-ethernet driver > usbcore: registered new interface driver rtl8150 > usbcore: registered new interface driver asix > usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether > usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_eem > usbcore: registered new interface driver dm9601 > usbcore: registered new interface driver smsc75xx > usbcore: registered new interface driver smsc95xx > usbcore: registered new interface driver gl620a > usbcore: registered new interface driver net1080 > usbcore: registered new interface driver plusb > usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_host > usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_subset > usbcore: registered new interface driver zaurus > usbcore: registered new interface driver MOSCHIP usb-ethernet driver > usbmon: deb USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver > ehci-omap ehci-omap.0: OMAP-EHCI Host Controller > ehci-omap ehci-omap.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 > ehci-omap ehci-omap.0: irq 77, io mem 0x48064800 > ehci-omap ehci-omap.0: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00 > usb usb1: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0002 > usb usb1: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1 > usb usb1: Product: OMAP-EHCI Host Controller > usb usb1: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.35.9-ipipe ehci_hcd > usb usb1: SerialNumber: ehci-omap.0 > hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found > hub 1-0:1.0: 3 ports detected > Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... > usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage > USB Mass Storage support registered. > i2c /dev entries driver > TCP cubic registered > NET: Registered protocol family 17 > NET: Registered protocol family 15 > Power Management for TI OMAP3. > VFP support v0.3: implementor 41 architecture 3 part 30 variant c rev 1 > regulator_init_complete: incomplete constraints, leaving VDVI on > regulator_init_complete: incomplete constraints, leaving VDAC on > Waiting for root device /dev/mmcblk0p2... > usb 1-2: new high speed USB device using ehci-omap and address 2 > mmc0: new high speed SDHC card at address fde5 > mmcblk0: mmc0:fde5 SD04G 3.69 GiB > mmcblk0: p1 p2 > EXT3-fs: barriers not enabled > kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds > EXT3-fs (mmcblk0p2): warning: maximal mount count reached, running > e2fsck isd > EXT3-fs (mmcblk0p2): using internal journal > EXT3-fs (mmcblk0p2): mounted filesystem with writeback data mode > VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) on device 179:2. > Freeing init memory: 132K > usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=0b95, idProduct=7720 > usb 1-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 > usb 1-2: Product: AX88772 > usb 1-2: Manufacturer: ASIX Elec. Corp. > usb 1-2: SerialNumber: 000001 > INIT: version 2.86 booting > Please wait: booting... > Starting udev > Illegal instruction > asix 1-2:1.0: eth0: register 'asix' at usb-ehci-omap.0-2, ASIX AX88772 > USB 2a > Remounting root file system... > Caching udev devnodes > Populating dev cache > ALSA: Restoring mixer settings... > Configuring network interfaces... /usr/sbin/alsactl: load_state:1610: > No sou. > eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x41E1 > udhcpc (v1.13.2) started > run-parts: /etc/udhcpc.d/00avahi-autoipd exited with code 1 > Sending discover... > Sending select for 192.168.0.101... > Lease of 192.168.0.101 obtained, lease time 10800 > run-parts: /etc/udhcpc.d/00avahi-autoipd exited with code 1 > adding dns 192.168.0.1 > ifconfig: SIOCGIFFLAGS: No such device > done. > Starting portmap daemon: portmap. > portmap: fork: No such deviceeth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa > 0x41E1 > net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter = 1 > net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter = 1 > hwclock: can't open '/dev/misc/rtc': No such file or directory > > > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai-help mailing list > Xenomai-help@domain.hid > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai beagleboard xm ethernet working! 2011-06-21 8:38 ` [Xenomai-help] Xenomai beagleboard xm ethernet working! David Wiebe @ 2011-06-21 10:37 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-21 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Wiebe; +Cc: xenomai On 06/21/2011 10:38 AM, David Wiebe wrote: > Hello, > > In menuconfig, unselect realtime clock. lol! Boots fine, ethernet > support works! I also patched the kernel to support spi which works in > userland. > > Now to make it all work as a rtos. If anyone has suggestions or > whatever, I need to work on a spi to ethernet bridge. I need to read > 360bytes every 1mS and send it out over ethernet. I've done this with a > non-rtos and achieved 360byte read and send every ~740uS. The problem > was sometimes it would vary between 700 and 900uS etc. I need this to > be isochronous and 1mS will work fine. > > There you have it! > Cheers! If you want deterministic access to ethernet, you will need RTnet. http://rtnet.org/ -- Gilles. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-20 15:25 ` Jakub Nowacki 2011-06-20 16:16 ` Philippe Gerum @ 2011-06-20 17:43 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-20 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jakub Nowacki; +Cc: Xenomai help On 06/20/2011 05:25 PM, Jakub Nowacki wrote: > On 06/20/2011 04:02 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> To make proper benchmarks, you should: >> - let the latency run long >> - provide some load, you can use the dohell script in xenomai-head to >> generate the load. >> > I've generated a load using 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null' one for each > core (8 in total), which is roughly the way how xeno-test does it. The > test was running for 30 min, which is not very long but I should see the > long latencies by that time, I think at least. xeno-test adds many more way to generate load, which you should use if you intend to have good results (I mean, really pessimistic ones). If you do not have time to run LTP completely, you can use hackbench for a few hours. -- Gilles. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 2011-06-17 19:00 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-17 19:44 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2011-06-17 19:48 ` Jakub Nowacki 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jakub Nowacki @ 2011-06-17 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gilles Chanteperdrix; +Cc: Xenomai help On 17/06/2011 20:00, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 06/17/2011 04:05 PM, Jakub Nowacki wrote: >>> >>> >>> I've added my ID to the table in smi.c file as: >> >> {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, >> PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_5_3400_SERIES_LPC_MIN+0xa)} >> >> Everything complies OK but during the startup I get message: >> >> [ 2.137733] Xenomai: SMI-enabled chipset found >> [ 2.137744] Xenomai: SMI workaround failed! >> >> Should I do something extra apart from adding it to the table? > > There are two reasons why it may not work: > - the way to globally disable SMIs has changed with the chipset version > you are using; > - the BIOS of your PC locks the SMI disabling bit. > > So, the next step is to check the chipset datasheet. > Following the datasheet available at: http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/datasheet/322169.pdf SMI_EN—SMI Control and Enable Register has address: PMBASE + 30 (see p. 531), which seems to be the same as in 'smi.c' (PMBASE is 0x40-0x43; see p. 460). Structure seems to be the same, namely, GBL_SMI_EN_BIT is the first bit. However, SMI enable can be locked using SMI_LOC bit in GEN_PMCON_1—General PM Configuration 1 Register (PM—D31:F0) with Offset Address: A0h; see p. 513. Hence, this one can potentially stop 'smi.c' from applying the workaround. Sorry for slightly descriptive approach but I don't know 'smi.c' code that well to fiddle with it. Hope it helps slightly. Best wishes, Jakub ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-21 10:37 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-06-16 9:18 [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 Jakub Nowacki 2011-06-16 10:37 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-17 14:05 ` Jakub Nowacki 2011-06-17 19:00 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-17 19:44 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-17 19:52 ` Jakub Nowacki 2011-06-18 15:17 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-20 14:34 ` Jakub Nowacki 2011-06-20 15:02 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-20 15:25 ` Jakub Nowacki 2011-06-20 16:16 ` Philippe Gerum 2011-06-20 17:34 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-20 21:30 ` Jakub Nowacki 2011-06-20 22:54 ` [Xenomai-help] Xenomai beagleboard xm ethernet not working David Wiebe 2011-06-21 6:54 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-21 8:18 ` David Wiebe 2011-06-21 8:38 ` [Xenomai-help] Xenomai beagleboard xm ethernet working! David Wiebe 2011-06-21 10:37 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-20 17:43 ` [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on i7-870 Gilles Chanteperdrix 2011-06-17 19:48 ` Jakub Nowacki
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.