* the mpc8315's compile option
@ 2011-06-23 1:55 NiQingliang
2011-06-23 2:46 ` Bruce Ashfield
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: NiQingliang @ 2011-06-23 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
mpc8315's core is e300c3, why use "tune-ppc603e.inc"?
I think there should be an file named "tune-ppce300c3.inc"? I can find
it in openembedded.
--
倪庆亮
TEL: 13588371863
E-MAIL: niqingliang@insigma.com.cn
BLOG: http://niqingliang2003.wordpress.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: the mpc8315's compile option
2011-06-23 1:55 the mpc8315's compile option NiQingliang
@ 2011-06-23 2:46 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-06-23 5:29 ` NiQingliang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-06-23 2:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NiQingliang; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
On 11-06-22 9:55 PM, NiQingliang wrote:
> mpc8315's core is e300c3, why use "tune-ppc603e.inc"?
The 603e represented a lowest common denominator tune file
when the BSP was introduced, and it was available in poky at
the time.
We simply haven't revisited the tuning for the BSP yet, since
what we have works at the moment.
>
> I think there should be an file named "tune-ppce300c3.inc"? I can find
> it in openembedded.
I'd definitely like to see patches that provide better tuning for this
BSP. So patches are welcome. Although at the moment, I'm not aware
of any plans to revisit the tuning.
Perhaps you'd like to log this as an enhancement request in the
yocto bugzilla ? That way we can be sure that it isn't forgotten.
Cheers,
Bruce
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: the mpc8315's compile option
2011-06-23 2:46 ` Bruce Ashfield
@ 2011-06-23 5:29 ` NiQingliang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: NiQingliang @ 2011-06-23 5:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
done!
http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1192
but it is the first time for me to use bugzilla, so if some misplay, let
me know, thanks!
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 10:46 +0800, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 11-06-22 9:55 PM, NiQingliang wrote:
> > mpc8315's core is e300c3, why use "tune-ppc603e.inc"?
>
> The 603e represented a lowest common denominator tune file
> when the BSP was introduced, and it was available in poky at
> the time.
>
> We simply haven't revisited the tuning for the BSP yet, since
> what we have works at the moment.
>
> >
> > I think there should be an file named "tune-ppce300c3.inc"? I can find
> > it in openembedded.
>
> I'd definitely like to see patches that provide better tuning for this
> BSP. So patches are welcome. Although at the moment, I'm not aware
> of any plans to revisit the tuning.
>
> Perhaps you'd like to log this as an enhancement request in the
> yocto bugzilla ? That way we can be sure that it isn't forgotten.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
>
> >
> >
>
--
倪庆亮
TEL: 13588371863
E-MAIL: niqingliang@insigma.com.cn
BLOG: http://niqingliang2003.wordpress.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-23 5:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-23 1:55 the mpc8315's compile option NiQingliang
2011-06-23 2:46 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-06-23 5:29 ` NiQingliang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.