All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Discouraged kernels 2.6.35+?
@ 2011-07-06  9:43 Orjan Friberg
  2011-07-06  9:52 ` Henning Heinold
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Orjan Friberg @ 2011-07-06  9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Openembedded-devel

Hi,

We're looking at upgrading our BeagleBoard-derived board to 2.6.35+. 
Out of the kernels available where COMPATIBLE_MACHINE=beagleboard, is 
there any we should avoid?  (The ones available are .35, .37, .38, and .39.)

I'm thinking if there was an aborted porting attempt at some stage, or 
if a kernel was ported but never saw any actual use.


Also, on the 2011.03-maintenance branch, are all kernels valid or should 
we stick to the default kernel (.32)?

Thanks,
Orjan

-- 
Orjan Friberg
FlatFrog Laboratories AB



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Discouraged kernels 2.6.35+?
  2011-07-06  9:43 Discouraged kernels 2.6.35+? Orjan Friberg
@ 2011-07-06  9:52 ` Henning Heinold
  2011-07-06 10:21   ` Orjan Friberg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Henning Heinold @ 2011-07-06  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-devel

Hi,

this depends on the features you need.

If you are needed to use the dsp you have to stick to .32
If you need the sgx running, the other kernels should work.

Bye Henning



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Discouraged kernels 2.6.35+?
  2011-07-06  9:52 ` Henning Heinold
@ 2011-07-06 10:21   ` Orjan Friberg
  2011-07-06 11:13     ` Henning Heinold
  2011-07-06 17:10     ` Enrico
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Orjan Friberg @ 2011-07-06 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org

On 2011-07-06 11:52, Henning Heinold wrote:
> If you are needed to use the dsp you have to stick to .32

Are there DSP-related packages that don't work with later kernels 
(dsplink, codec engine) or something else?

-- 
Orjan Friberg
FlatFrog Laboratories AB



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Discouraged kernels 2.6.35+?
  2011-07-06 10:21   ` Orjan Friberg
@ 2011-07-06 11:13     ` Henning Heinold
  2011-07-07  9:40       ` Orjan Friberg
  2011-07-06 17:10     ` Enrico
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Henning Heinold @ 2011-07-06 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Orjan Friberg; +Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org

On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:21:03PM +0200, Orjan Friberg wrote:
> On 2011-07-06 11:52, Henning Heinold wrote:
>> If you are needed to use the dsp you have to stick to .32
>
> Are there DSP-related packages that don't work with later kernels  
> (dsplink, codec engine) or something else?

Hi again,

can't say for sure, that is only my knowledge from asking and hearing.

Koen Kooi may help you better or try to ask on the #beagle on irc.freenode.net

Bye Henning



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Discouraged kernels 2.6.35+?
  2011-07-06 10:21   ` Orjan Friberg
  2011-07-06 11:13     ` Henning Heinold
@ 2011-07-06 17:10     ` Enrico
  2011-07-07  9:41       ` Orjan Friberg
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Enrico @ 2011-07-06 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-devel

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Orjan Friberg <of@flatfrog.com> wrote:
> On 2011-07-06 11:52, Henning Heinold wrote:
>>
>> If you are needed to use the dsp you have to stick to .32
>
> Are there DSP-related packages that don't work with later kernels (dsplink,
> codec engine) or something else?

On an igep board i've tested gstreamer-ti and gst-dsp with kernels .35
(from igep git) and .39 (linux-omap_2.6.39 with custom configuration),
no problems so far.

Enrico



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Discouraged kernels 2.6.35+?
  2011-07-06 11:13     ` Henning Heinold
@ 2011-07-07  9:40       ` Orjan Friberg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Orjan Friberg @ 2011-07-07  9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Henning Heinold; +Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org

On 2011-07-06 13:13, Henning Heinold wrote:
> Koen Kooi may help you better or try to ask on the #beagle on irc.freenode.net

Got an answer from Koen there ("use the angstrom default kernel", 
basically).

Thanks,
Orjan

-- 
Orjan Friberg
FlatFrog Laboratories AB



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Discouraged kernels 2.6.35+?
  2011-07-06 17:10     ` Enrico
@ 2011-07-07  9:41       ` Orjan Friberg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Orjan Friberg @ 2011-07-07  9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org

On 2011-07-06 19:10, Enrico wrote:
> On an igep board i've tested gstreamer-ti and gst-dsp with kernels .35
> (from igep git) and .39 (linux-omap_2.6.39 with custom configuration),
> no problems so far.

Thanks, good to know.

-- 
Orjan Friberg
FlatFrog Laboratories AB



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-07  9:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-06  9:43 Discouraged kernels 2.6.35+? Orjan Friberg
2011-07-06  9:52 ` Henning Heinold
2011-07-06 10:21   ` Orjan Friberg
2011-07-06 11:13     ` Henning Heinold
2011-07-07  9:40       ` Orjan Friberg
2011-07-06 17:10     ` Enrico
2011-07-07  9:41       ` Orjan Friberg

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.