From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 13/18] KVM: MMU: introduce the rules to modify shadow page table
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 03:30:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E1B4F5B.8090900@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E1B4CF8.605@cn.fujitsu.com>
Introduce some interfaces to modify spte as linux kernel does:
- mmu_spte_clear_track_bits, it set the spte from present to nonpresent, and
track the stat bits(accessed/dirty) of spte
- mmu_spte_clear_no_track, the same as mmu_spte_clear_track_bits except
tracking the stat bits
- mmu_spte_set, set spte from nonpresent to present
- mmu_spte_update, only update the stat bits
Now, it does not allowed to set spte from present to present, later, we can
drop the atomicly opration for X86_32 host, and it is the preparing work to
get spte on X86_32 host out of the mmu lock
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 1d4a2d9..982718f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -299,12 +299,30 @@ static bool spte_is_bit_cleared(u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, u64 bit_mask)
return (old_spte & bit_mask) && !(new_spte & bit_mask);
}
-static void update_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
+/* Rules for using mmu_spte_set:
+ * Set the sptep from nonpresent to present.
+ * Note: the sptep being assigned *must* be either not present
+ * or in a state where the hardware will not attempt to update
+ * the spte.
+ */
+static void mmu_spte_set(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
+{
+ WARN_ON(is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep));
+ __set_spte(sptep, new_spte);
+}
+
+/* Rules for using mmu_spte_update:
+ * Update the state bits, it means the mapped pfn is not changged.
+ */
+static void mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
{
u64 mask, old_spte = *sptep;
WARN_ON(!is_rmap_spte(new_spte));
+ if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte))
+ return mmu_spte_set(sptep, new_spte);
+
new_spte |= old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask;
mask = shadow_accessed_mask;
@@ -325,6 +343,42 @@ static void update_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
kvm_set_pfn_dirty(spte_to_pfn(old_spte));
}
+/*
+ * Rules for using mmu_spte_clear_track_bits:
+ * It sets the sptep from present to nonpresent, and track the
+ * state bits, it is used to clear the last level sptep.
+ */
+static int mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(u64 *sptep)
+{
+ pfn_t pfn;
+ u64 old_spte = *sptep;
+
+ if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte))
+ __set_spte(sptep, 0ull);
+ else
+ old_spte = __xchg_spte(sptep, 0ull);
+
+ if (!is_rmap_spte(old_spte))
+ return 0;
+
+ pfn = spte_to_pfn(old_spte);
+ if (!shadow_accessed_mask || old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask)
+ kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn);
+ if (!shadow_dirty_mask || (old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask))
+ kvm_set_pfn_dirty(pfn);
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Rules for using mmu_spte_clear_no_track:
+ * Directly clear spte without caring the state bits of sptep,
+ * it is used to set the upper level spte.
+ */
+static void mmu_spte_clear_no_track(u64 *sptep)
+{
+ __set_spte(sptep, 0ull);
+}
+
static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
struct kmem_cache *base_cache, int min)
{
@@ -746,30 +800,9 @@ static void rmap_remove(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *spte)
pte_list_remove(spte, rmapp);
}
-static int set_spte_track_bits(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
-{
- pfn_t pfn;
- u64 old_spte = *sptep;
-
- if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte))
- __set_spte(sptep, new_spte);
- else
- old_spte = __xchg_spte(sptep, new_spte);
-
- if (!is_rmap_spte(old_spte))
- return 0;
-
- pfn = spte_to_pfn(old_spte);
- if (!shadow_accessed_mask || old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask)
- kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn);
- if (!shadow_dirty_mask || (old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask))
- kvm_set_pfn_dirty(pfn);
- return 1;
-}
-
static void drop_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
{
- if (set_spte_track_bits(sptep, 0ull))
+ if (mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(sptep))
rmap_remove(kvm, sptep);
}
@@ -787,7 +820,7 @@ static int rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gfn)
BUG_ON(!(*spte & PT_PRESENT_MASK));
rmap_printk("rmap_write_protect: spte %p %llx\n", spte, *spte);
if (is_writable_pte(*spte)) {
- update_spte(spte, *spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
+ mmu_spte_update(spte, *spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
write_protected = 1;
}
spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, spte);
@@ -856,7 +889,8 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
new_spte &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
new_spte &= ~SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
new_spte &= ~shadow_accessed_mask;
- set_spte_track_bits(spte, new_spte);
+ mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(spte);
+ mmu_spte_set(spte, new_spte);
spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, spte);
}
}
@@ -1077,7 +1111,7 @@ static void drop_parent_pte(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
u64 *parent_pte)
{
mmu_page_remove_parent_pte(sp, parent_pte);
- __set_spte(parent_pte, 0ull);
+ mmu_spte_clear_no_track(parent_pte);
}
static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -1525,7 +1559,7 @@ static void link_shadow_page(u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
spte = __pa(sp->spt)
| PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_ACCESSED_MASK
| PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_USER_MASK;
- __set_spte(sptep, spte);
+ mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
}
static void drop_large_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
@@ -1992,7 +2026,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
mark_page_dirty(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
set_pte:
- update_spte(sptep, spte);
+ mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
/*
* If we overwrite a writable spte with a read-only one we
* should flush remote TLBs. Otherwise rmap_write_protect
@@ -2198,11 +2232,11 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
return -ENOMEM;
}
- __set_spte(iterator.sptep,
- __pa(sp->spt)
- | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK
- | shadow_user_mask | shadow_x_mask
- | shadow_accessed_mask);
+ mmu_spte_set(iterator.sptep,
+ __pa(sp->spt)
+ | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK
+ | shadow_user_mask | shadow_x_mask
+ | shadow_accessed_mask);
}
}
return emulate;
@@ -3439,7 +3473,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
/* avoid RMW */
if (is_writable_pte(pt[i]))
- update_spte(&pt[i], pt[i] & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
+ mmu_spte_update(&pt[i],
+ pt[i] & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
}
}
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-11 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-11 19:20 [PATCH v4 00/18] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:21 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] KVM: MMU: fix walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] KVM: MMU: do not update slot bitmap if spte is nonpresent Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] KVM: x86: introduce vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa to cleanup the code Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:23 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] KVM: MMU: cache mmio info on page fault path Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] KVM: MMU: optimize to handle dirty bit Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] KVM: MMU: cleanup for FNAME(fetch) Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] KVM: MMU: rename 'pt_write' to 'emulate' Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:26 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] KVM: MMU: count used shadow pages on prepareing path Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:27 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_free_page Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:28 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] KVM: MMU: remove bypass_guest_pf Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:28 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] KVM: MMU: filter out the mmio pfn from the fault pfn Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:29 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] KVM: MMU: abstract some functions to handle " Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:30 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2011-07-11 19:31 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] KVM: MMU: do not need atomicly to set/clear spte Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] KVM: MMU: lockless walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] KVM: MMU: reorganize struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:33 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] KVM: MMU: mmio page fault support Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-12 20:00 ` [PATCH] KVM: x86: Apply required parentheses in __check_direct_spte_mmio_pf Jan Kiszka
2011-07-13 13:25 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-11 19:34 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] KVM: MMU: trace mmio page fault Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-12 8:39 ` [PATCH v4 00/18] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E1B4F5B.8090900@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.