From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 15/18] KVM: MMU: lockless walking shadow page table
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 03:32:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E1B4FBD.2000607@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E1B4CF8.605@cn.fujitsu.com>
Use rcu to protect shadow pages table to be freed, so we can safely walk it,
it should run fastly and is needed by mmio page fault
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 +++
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 42e577d..87a868e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -233,6 +233,12 @@ struct kvm_mmu_page {
unsigned int unsync_children;
unsigned long parent_ptes; /* Reverse mapping for parent_pte */
DECLARE_BITMAP(unsync_child_bitmap, 512);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+ int clear_spte_count;
+#endif
+
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
};
struct kvm_pv_mmu_op_buffer {
@@ -477,6 +483,8 @@ struct kvm_arch {
u64 hv_guest_os_id;
u64 hv_hypercall;
+ atomic_t reader_counter;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_MMU_AUDIT
int audit_point;
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index a22b5fe..374530a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -182,6 +182,12 @@ struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator {
shadow_walk_okay(&(_walker)); \
shadow_walk_next(&(_walker)))
+#define for_each_shadow_entry_lockless(_vcpu, _addr, _walker, spte) \
+ for (shadow_walk_init(&(_walker), _vcpu, _addr); \
+ shadow_walk_okay(&(_walker)) && \
+ ({ spte = mmu_spte_get_lockless(_walker.sptep); 1; }); \
+ __shadow_walk_next(&(_walker), spte))
+
static struct kmem_cache *pte_list_desc_cache;
static struct kmem_cache *mmu_page_header_cache;
static struct percpu_counter kvm_total_used_mmu_pages;
@@ -274,6 +280,11 @@ static u64 __update_clear_spte_slow(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
{
return xchg(sptep, spte);
}
+
+static u64 __get_spte_lockless(u64 *sptep)
+{
+ return ACCESS_ONCE(*sptep);
+}
#else
union split_spte {
struct {
@@ -283,6 +294,18 @@ union split_spte {
u64 spte;
};
+static void count_spte_clear(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = page_header(__pa(sptep));
+
+ if (is_shadow_present_pte(spte))
+ return;
+
+ /* Ensure the spte is completely set before we increase the count */
+ smp_wmb();
+ sp->clear_spte_count++;
+}
+
static void __set_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
{
union split_spte *ssptep, sspte;
@@ -318,6 +341,7 @@ static void __update_clear_spte_fast(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
smp_wmb();
ssptep->spte_high = sspte.spte_high;
+ count_spte_clear(sptep, spte);
}
static u64 __update_clear_spte_slow(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
@@ -330,9 +354,40 @@ static u64 __update_clear_spte_slow(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
/* xchg acts as a barrier before the setting of the high bits */
orig.spte_low = xchg(&ssptep->spte_low, sspte.spte_low);
orig.spte_high = ssptep->spte_high = sspte.spte_high;
+ count_spte_clear(sptep, spte);
return orig.spte;
}
+
+/*
+ * The idea using the light way get the spte on x86_32 guest is from
+ * gup_get_pte(arch/x86/mm/gup.c).
+ * The difference is we can not catch the spte tlb flush if we leave
+ * guest mode, so we emulate it by increase clear_spte_count when spte
+ * is cleared.
+ */
+static u64 __get_spte_lockless(u64 *sptep)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = page_header(__pa(sptep));
+ union split_spte spte, *orig = (union split_spte *)sptep;
+ int count;
+
+retry:
+ count = sp->clear_spte_count;
+ smp_rmb();
+
+ spte.spte_low = orig->spte_low;
+ smp_rmb();
+
+ spte.spte_high = orig->spte_high;
+ smp_rmb();
+
+ if (unlikely(spte.spte_low != orig->spte_low ||
+ count != sp->clear_spte_count))
+ goto retry;
+
+ return spte.spte;
+}
#endif
static bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte)
@@ -435,6 +490,28 @@ static void mmu_spte_clear_no_track(u64 *sptep)
__update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, 0ull);
}
+static u64 mmu_spte_get_lockless(u64 *sptep)
+{
+ return __get_spte_lockless(sptep);
+}
+
+static void walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ atomic_inc(&vcpu->kvm->arch.reader_counter);
+
+ /* Increase the counter before walking shadow page table */
+ smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
+}
+
+static void walk_shadow_page_lockless_end(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ /* Decrease the counter after walking shadow page table finished */
+ smp_mb__before_atomic_dec();
+ atomic_dec(&vcpu->kvm->arch.reader_counter);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
struct kmem_cache *base_cache, int min)
{
@@ -1597,17 +1674,23 @@ static bool shadow_walk_okay(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator)
return true;
}
-static void shadow_walk_next(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator)
+static void __shadow_walk_next(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator,
+ u64 spte)
{
- if (is_last_spte(*iterator->sptep, iterator->level)) {
+ if (is_last_spte(spte, iterator->level)) {
iterator->level = 0;
return;
}
- iterator->shadow_addr = *iterator->sptep & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK;
+ iterator->shadow_addr = spte & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK;
--iterator->level;
}
+static void shadow_walk_next(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator)
+{
+ return __shadow_walk_next(iterator, *iterator->sptep);
+}
+
static void link_shadow_page(u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
u64 spte;
@@ -1754,6 +1837,30 @@ static int kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
return ret;
}
+static void kvm_mmu_isolate_pages(struct list_head *invalid_list)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(sp, invalid_list, link)
+ kvm_mmu_isolate_page(sp);
+}
+
+static void free_pages_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *next, *sp;
+
+ sp = container_of(head, struct kvm_mmu_page, rcu);
+ while (sp) {
+ if (!list_empty(&sp->link))
+ next = list_first_entry(&sp->link,
+ struct kvm_mmu_page, link);
+ else
+ next = NULL;
+ kvm_mmu_free_page(sp);
+ sp = next;
+ }
+}
+
static void kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm,
struct list_head *invalid_list)
{
@@ -1764,6 +1871,14 @@ static void kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm,
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+ if (atomic_read(&kvm->arch.reader_counter)) {
+ kvm_mmu_isolate_pages(invalid_list);
+ sp = list_first_entry(invalid_list, struct kvm_mmu_page, link);
+ list_del_init(invalid_list);
+ call_rcu(&sp->rcu, free_pages_rcu);
+ return;
+ }
+
do {
sp = list_first_entry(invalid_list, struct kvm_mmu_page, link);
WARN_ON(!sp->role.invalid || sp->root_count);
@@ -3784,16 +3899,17 @@ out:
int kvm_mmu_get_spte_hierarchy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 sptes[4])
{
struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator;
+ u64 spte;
int nr_sptes = 0;
- spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
- for_each_shadow_entry(vcpu, addr, iterator) {
- sptes[iterator.level-1] = *iterator.sptep;
+ walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin(vcpu);
+ for_each_shadow_entry_lockless(vcpu, addr, iterator, spte) {
+ sptes[iterator.level-1] = spte;
nr_sptes++;
- if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*iterator.sptep))
+ if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte))
break;
}
- spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
+ walk_shadow_page_lockless_end(vcpu);
return nr_sptes;
}
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-11 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-11 19:20 [PATCH v4 00/18] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:21 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] KVM: MMU: fix walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] KVM: MMU: do not update slot bitmap if spte is nonpresent Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] KVM: x86: introduce vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa to cleanup the code Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:23 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] KVM: MMU: cache mmio info on page fault path Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] KVM: MMU: optimize to handle dirty bit Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] KVM: MMU: cleanup for FNAME(fetch) Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] KVM: MMU: rename 'pt_write' to 'emulate' Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:26 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] KVM: MMU: count used shadow pages on prepareing path Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:27 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_free_page Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:28 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] KVM: MMU: remove bypass_guest_pf Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:28 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] KVM: MMU: filter out the mmio pfn from the fault pfn Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:29 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] KVM: MMU: abstract some functions to handle " Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:30 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] KVM: MMU: introduce the rules to modify shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:31 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] KVM: MMU: do not need atomicly to set/clear spte Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:32 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2011-07-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] KVM: MMU: reorganize struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-11 19:33 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] KVM: MMU: mmio page fault support Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-12 20:00 ` [PATCH] KVM: x86: Apply required parentheses in __check_direct_spte_mmio_pf Jan Kiszka
2011-07-13 13:25 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-11 19:34 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] KVM: MMU: trace mmio page fault Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-12 8:39 ` [PATCH v4 00/18] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E1B4FBD.2000607@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.