* IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? @ 2011-07-14 13:05 Kumar Gala 2011-07-14 13:13 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Kumar Gala @ 2011-07-14 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yocto discussion list Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not. - k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? 2011-07-14 13:05 IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? Kumar Gala @ 2011-07-14 13:13 ` Bruce Ashfield 2011-07-14 13:40 ` Koen Kooi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-07-14 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kumar Gala; +Cc: Yocto discussion list On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote: > Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not. I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that you are talking about the common use case, and not something more exotic :) Cheers, Bruce > > - k > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? 2011-07-14 13:13 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-07-14 13:40 ` Koen Kooi 2011-07-14 13:56 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Koen Kooi @ 2011-07-14 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Yocto discussion list Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: > On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote: >> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not. > > I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that > uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that > you are talking about the common use case, and not something > more exotic :) I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? 2011-07-14 13:40 ` Koen Kooi @ 2011-07-14 13:56 ` Bruce Ashfield 2011-07-14 16:20 ` Kumar Gala 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-07-14 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Koen Kooi; +Cc: Yocto discussion list On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: > >> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote: >>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not. >> >> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that >> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that >> you are talking about the common use case, and not something >> more exotic :) > > > I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :) Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally, but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts! Cheers, Bruce ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? 2011-07-14 13:56 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-07-14 16:20 ` Kumar Gala 2011-07-14 16:21 ` Koen Kooi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Kumar Gala @ 2011-07-14 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Yocto discussion list On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: >> >>> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not. >>> >>> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that >>> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that >>> you are talking about the common use case, and not something >>> more exotic :) >> >> >> I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :) > > Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally, > but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts! > > Cheers, > > Bruce > What's the IMAGE_FSTYPE for a normal uImage ? - k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? 2011-07-14 16:20 ` Kumar Gala @ 2011-07-14 16:21 ` Koen Kooi 2011-07-14 16:24 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Koen Kooi @ 2011-07-14 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kumar Gala; +Cc: Yocto discussion list Op 14 jul 2011, om 18:20 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven: > > On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> >>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: >>> >>>> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not. >>>> >>>> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that >>>> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that >>>> you are talking about the common use case, and not something >>>> more exotic :) >>> >>> >>> I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :) >> >> Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally, >> but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts! >> >> Cheers, >> >> Bruce >> > > What's the IMAGE_FSTYPE for a normal uImage ? None, it's built by the kernel class, not the rootfs class. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? 2011-07-14 16:21 ` Koen Kooi @ 2011-07-14 16:24 ` Bruce Ashfield 2011-07-14 16:34 ` Kumar Gala 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-07-14 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Koen Kooi; +Cc: Yocto discussion list On 07/14/11 12:21, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 14 jul 2011, om 18:20 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven: > >> >> On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >>> On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>> >>>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: >>>> >>>>> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>>>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that >>>>> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that >>>>> you are talking about the common use case, and not something >>>>> more exotic :) >>>> >>>> >>>> I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :) >>> >>> Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally, >>> but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Bruce >>> >> >> What's the IMAGE_FSTYPE for a normal uImage ? > > None, it's built by the kernel class, not the rootfs class. and to expand a bit, the machine conf would have: KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "uImage" So the kernel class will build and produce a uImage for deployment. Cheers, Bruce ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? 2011-07-14 16:24 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-07-14 16:34 ` Kumar Gala 2011-07-14 20:56 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Kumar Gala @ 2011-07-14 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Yocto discussion list On Jul 14, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 07/14/11 12:21, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Op 14 jul 2011, om 18:20 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven: >> >>> >>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: >>>>> >>>>>> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>>>>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that >>>>>> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that >>>>>> you are talking about the common use case, and not something >>>>>> more exotic :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :) >>>> >>>> Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally, >>>> but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Bruce >>>> >>> >>> What's the IMAGE_FSTYPE for a normal uImage ? >> >> None, it's built by the kernel class, not the rootfs class. > > and to expand a bit, the machine conf would have: > > KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "uImage" > > So the kernel class will build and produce a uImage for deployment. Ah, so there isnt support for getting a ramdisk wrapped via mkimage. - k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? 2011-07-14 16:34 ` Kumar Gala @ 2011-07-14 20:56 ` Bruce Ashfield 2011-07-14 21:24 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-07-14 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kumar Gala; +Cc: Yocto discussion list On 07/14/11 12:34, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> On 07/14/11 12:21, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> >>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 18:20 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven: >>> >>>> >>>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>>>>>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that >>>>>>> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that >>>>>>> you are talking about the common use case, and not something >>>>>>> more exotic :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :) >>>>> >>>>> Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally, >>>>> but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts! >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Bruce >>>>> >>>> >>>> What's the IMAGE_FSTYPE for a normal uImage ? >>> >>> None, it's built by the kernel class, not the rootfs class. >> >> and to expand a bit, the machine conf would have: >> >> KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "uImage" >> >> So the kernel class will build and produce a uImage for deployment. > > Ah, so there isnt support for getting a ramdisk wrapped via mkimage. Correct, or at least not that I've used out of the box, and this is what Koen was commenting on. Cheers, Bruce > > - k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? 2011-07-14 20:56 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-07-14 21:24 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2011-07-14 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Yocto discussion list On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 16:56 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 07/14/11 12:34, Kumar Gala wrote: > > > > On Jul 14, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > >> On 07/14/11 12:21, Koen Kooi wrote: > >>> > >>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 18:20 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote: > >>>>>>>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that > >>>>>>> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that > >>>>>>> you are talking about the common use case, and not something > >>>>>>> more exotic :) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :) > >>>>> > >>>>> Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally, > >>>>> but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts! > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> > >>>>> Bruce > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> What's the IMAGE_FSTYPE for a normal uImage ? > >>> > >>> None, it's built by the kernel class, not the rootfs class. > >> > >> and to expand a bit, the machine conf would have: > >> > >> KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "uImage" > >> > >> So the kernel class will build and produce a uImage for deployment. > > > > Ah, so there isnt support for getting a ramdisk wrapped via mkimage. > > Correct, or at least not that I've used out of the box, and > this is what Koen was commenting on. I think we have all the pieces there but someone would have to connect them up... Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-14 21:24 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-07-14 13:05 IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? Kumar Gala 2011-07-14 13:13 ` Bruce Ashfield 2011-07-14 13:40 ` Koen Kooi 2011-07-14 13:56 ` Bruce Ashfield 2011-07-14 16:20 ` Kumar Gala 2011-07-14 16:21 ` Koen Kooi 2011-07-14 16:24 ` Bruce Ashfield 2011-07-14 16:34 ` Kumar Gala 2011-07-14 20:56 ` Bruce Ashfield 2011-07-14 21:24 ` Richard Purdie
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.