* IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?
@ 2011-07-14 13:05 Kumar Gala
2011-07-14 13:13 ` Bruce Ashfield
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2011-07-14 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yocto discussion list
Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not.
- k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?
2011-07-14 13:05 IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? Kumar Gala
@ 2011-07-14 13:13 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-07-14 13:40 ` Koen Kooi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-07-14 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kumar Gala; +Cc: Yocto discussion list
On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not.
I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that
uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that
you are talking about the common use case, and not something
more exotic :)
Cheers,
Bruce
>
> - k
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?
2011-07-14 13:13 ` Bruce Ashfield
@ 2011-07-14 13:40 ` Koen Kooi
2011-07-14 13:56 ` Bruce Ashfield
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Koen Kooi @ 2011-07-14 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Yocto discussion list
Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven:
> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not.
>
> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that
> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that
> you are talking about the common use case, and not something
> more exotic :)
I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?
2011-07-14 13:40 ` Koen Kooi
@ 2011-07-14 13:56 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-07-14 16:20 ` Kumar Gala
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-07-14 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Koen Kooi; +Cc: Yocto discussion list
On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not.
>>
>> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that
>> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that
>> you are talking about the common use case, and not something
>> more exotic :)
>
>
> I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :)
Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally,
but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts!
Cheers,
Bruce
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?
2011-07-14 13:56 ` Bruce Ashfield
@ 2011-07-14 16:20 ` Kumar Gala
2011-07-14 16:21 ` Koen Kooi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2011-07-14 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Yocto discussion list
On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not.
>>>
>>> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that
>>> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that
>>> you are talking about the common use case, and not something
>>> more exotic :)
>>
>>
>> I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :)
>
> Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally,
> but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
>
What's the IMAGE_FSTYPE for a normal uImage ?
- k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?
2011-07-14 16:20 ` Kumar Gala
@ 2011-07-14 16:21 ` Koen Kooi
2011-07-14 16:24 ` Bruce Ashfield
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Koen Kooi @ 2011-07-14 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kumar Gala; +Cc: Yocto discussion list
Op 14 jul 2011, om 18:20 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven:
>
> On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>> On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>
>>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>>> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that
>>>> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that
>>>> you are talking about the common use case, and not something
>>>> more exotic :)
>>>
>>>
>>> I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :)
>>
>> Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally,
>> but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>
> What's the IMAGE_FSTYPE for a normal uImage ?
None, it's built by the kernel class, not the rootfs class.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?
2011-07-14 16:21 ` Koen Kooi
@ 2011-07-14 16:24 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-07-14 16:34 ` Kumar Gala
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-07-14 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Koen Kooi; +Cc: Yocto discussion list
On 07/14/11 12:21, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 14 jul 2011, om 18:20 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven:
>
>>
>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven:
>>>>
>>>>> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that
>>>>> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that
>>>>> you are talking about the common use case, and not something
>>>>> more exotic :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :)
>>>
>>> Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally,
>>> but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>
>> What's the IMAGE_FSTYPE for a normal uImage ?
>
> None, it's built by the kernel class, not the rootfs class.
and to expand a bit, the machine conf would have:
KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "uImage"
So the kernel class will build and produce a uImage for deployment.
Cheers,
Bruce
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?
2011-07-14 16:24 ` Bruce Ashfield
@ 2011-07-14 16:34 ` Kumar Gala
2011-07-14 20:56 ` Bruce Ashfield
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2011-07-14 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Yocto discussion list
On Jul 14, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 07/14/11 12:21, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 18:20 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>>>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that
>>>>>> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that
>>>>>> you are talking about the common use case, and not something
>>>>>> more exotic :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :)
>>>>
>>>> Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally,
>>>> but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts!
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Bruce
>>>>
>>>
>>> What's the IMAGE_FSTYPE for a normal uImage ?
>>
>> None, it's built by the kernel class, not the rootfs class.
>
> and to expand a bit, the machine conf would have:
>
> KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "uImage"
>
> So the kernel class will build and produce a uImage for deployment.
Ah, so there isnt support for getting a ramdisk wrapped via mkimage.
- k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?
2011-07-14 16:34 ` Kumar Gala
@ 2011-07-14 20:56 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-07-14 21:24 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-07-14 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kumar Gala; +Cc: Yocto discussion list
On 07/14/11 12:34, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>> On 07/14/11 12:21, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>
>>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 18:20 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>>>>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that
>>>>>>> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that
>>>>>>> you are talking about the common use case, and not something
>>>>>>> more exotic :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally,
>>>>> but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts!
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What's the IMAGE_FSTYPE for a normal uImage ?
>>>
>>> None, it's built by the kernel class, not the rootfs class.
>>
>> and to expand a bit, the machine conf would have:
>>
>> KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "uImage"
>>
>> So the kernel class will build and produce a uImage for deployment.
>
> Ah, so there isnt support for getting a ramdisk wrapped via mkimage.
Correct, or at least not that I've used out of the box, and
this is what Koen was commenting on.
Cheers,
Bruce
>
> - k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?
2011-07-14 20:56 ` Bruce Ashfield
@ 2011-07-14 21:24 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2011-07-14 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Yocto discussion list
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 16:56 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 07/14/11 12:34, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 14, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/14/11 12:21, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 18:20 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that
> >>>>>>> uImages are supported and work nicely. Assuming that
> >>>>>>> you are talking about the common use case, and not something
> >>>>>>> more exotic :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think he means partitioned uimages where you have a kernel + initrd in a single uimage. We don't support that *yet*, but all the needed blocks are there. And we finally get a usecase for having the loadadresses in the machine.conf files :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yah, that's what I wondered as well. I've done this locally,
> >>>>> but nothing out of the box .. so I had nagging doubts!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bruce
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> What's the IMAGE_FSTYPE for a normal uImage ?
> >>>
> >>> None, it's built by the kernel class, not the rootfs class.
> >>
> >> and to expand a bit, the machine conf would have:
> >>
> >> KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "uImage"
> >>
> >> So the kernel class will build and produce a uImage for deployment.
> >
> > Ah, so there isnt support for getting a ramdisk wrapped via mkimage.
>
> Correct, or at least not that I've used out of the box, and
> this is what Koen was commenting on.
I think we have all the pieces there but someone would have to connect
them up...
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-14 21:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-14 13:05 IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported? Kumar Gala
2011-07-14 13:13 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-07-14 13:40 ` Koen Kooi
2011-07-14 13:56 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-07-14 16:20 ` Kumar Gala
2011-07-14 16:21 ` Koen Kooi
2011-07-14 16:24 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-07-14 16:34 ` Kumar Gala
2011-07-14 20:56 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-07-14 21:24 ` Richard Purdie
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.