From: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
To: Koen Beel <koen.beel.barco@gmail.com>
Cc: "Wolfram Sang" <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, "Shawn Guo" <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
shijie8@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Lothar Waßmann" <LW@karo-electronics.de>
Subject: Re: GPMI-NAND Status?
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:18:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E40ED4B.6030302@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHMSPgPzVordYOn5wgp0OZLGbAqkSGKJxDre8bvRpTyAz85udw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Koen:
thanks for your test.
> Hi,
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Huang Shijie<b32955@freescale.com> wrote:
>> Hi Koen:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Huang Shijie<b32955@freescale.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>> On my target, the mxs-dma is working for sdio until the gpmi-nand
>>>>> gives a timeout. After that the dma for sdio is *not fully* working
>>>>> anymore.
>>>>>
>>>> We need more log in following aspects:
>>>> [1] apbh-dma registers
>>>> [2] clk registers
>>>> [3] gpmi registers
>>>>
>>>> Please git-apply the patch in the attachment.
>>>> It will print out more DMA information WHEN dma-timeout occur.
>>> Don't get it. What exactly are you trying to dump?
>>> This patch dumps CTRL0, CTRL1, CTRL2, DEVSEL but also some registers
>>> of APBH channel0 which is reserved....
>> sorry, I intended to print out the channel 4(NAND_DEVICE0).
>>
>> I want to know that:
>> When the dma timeout occurs, whether it caused by the GPMI or by the DMA
>> itself.
> Ok, I was a little confused about the addresses, but it seems like you
> are using mx28 (and corresponding addresses). APBH dma for mx23 has
> different address according to the datasheet.
> So I adjusted the patch a little for mx23, see attachment.
>
you are right. My address was wrong.
> Here is the log with some comments added on the dma.
>
> # ubiformat /dev/mtd1
> ubiformat: mtd1 (nand), size 20971520 bytes (20.0 MiB), 40 eraseblocks
> of 524288 bytes (512.0 KiB), min. I/O size 4096 bytes
> libscan: scanning eraseblock 0 -- 2 % complete [ 86.720000] [
> start_dma_without_bch_irq : 393 ] DMA timeout, last DMA :1
> [ 86.720000] ------------------------DMA DUMP BEGIN ----------
> [ 86.730000] APBH REG :0 : 30000000 // -> HW_APBH_CTRL0:
> AHB_BURST8_EN, APB_BURST4_EN
> [ 86.730000] APBH REG :10 : 00FF0000 // -> HW_APBH_CTRL1:
> CHX_CMDCMPLT_IRQ_EN, no cmdcmplt_irq
> [ 86.740000] APBH REG :20 : 00000000 // -> HW_APBH_CTRL2: no error_irq
> [ 86.740000] APBH REG :30 : 00000000 // -> HW_APBH_DEVSEL: "N/A
> for apbh bridge dma."
> [ 86.750000] APBH CH4 REG :200 : 418D7098 // executing last dma
> command of command chain (see below)
> [ 86.750000] APBH CH4 REG :210 : 00000000 // no next command, ok
> [ 86.750000] APBH CH4 REG :220 : 000001C8 // HW_APBH_CH4_CMD:
> COMMAND = NO DMA TRANSFER, IRQONCMPLT, WAIT4ENDCMD, SEMAPHORE,
> HALTONTERMINATE
> [ 86.760000] APBH CH4 REG :230 : 00000000 // HW_APBH_CH4_BAR:
> "Address of system memory buffer to be read or written over the AHB
> bus." -> strange value ...
> [ 86.760000] APBH CH4 REG :240 : 00010000 // HW_APBH_CH4_SEMA:
> semaphore counter is 1
> [ 86.770000] APBH CH4 REG :250 : 03A00015 // HW_APBH_CH4_DEBUG1:
> LOCK, NEXTCMDADDRVALID, RD_FIFO_EMPTY, WR_FIFO_EMPTY, STATEMACHINE =
> "WAIT_END = 0x15 When the Wait for Command End bit is set, the state
> machine enters this state until the DMA device indicates that the
> command is complete."
> [ 86.770000] APBH CH4 REG :260 : 00000000 // -> HW_APBH_CH4_DEBUG2:
> no apb of ahb bytes remaining for transfer
> [ 86.780000] [ 0 ] : ME : 418d7000, next : 418d704c, bits :
> 00002304, bytes : 00000000, buf : 00000000
> [ 86.790000] [ 0 ] PIO[0] : 03800000
> [ 86.790000] [ 0 ] PIO[1] : 00000000
> [ 86.800000] [ 0 ] PIO[2] : 00000000
> [ 86.800000] [ 1 ] : ME : 418d704c, next : 418d7098, bits :
> 00006304, bytes : 00000001, buf : 4181b000
> [ 86.810000] [ 1 ] PIO[0] : 018010da
> [ 86.810000] [ 1 ] PIO[1] : 00000000
> [ 86.820000] [ 1 ] PIO[2] : 000011ff
> [ 86.820000] [ 2 ] : ME : 418d7098, next : 00000000, bits :
It hungs here.
> 000023c8, bytes : 00000000, buf : 00000000
> [ 86.830000] [ 2 ] PIO[0] : 038010da
> [ 86.840000] [ 2 ] PIO[1] : 00000000
> [ 86.840000] [ 2 ] PIO[2] : 00000000
> [ 86.840000] ------------------------DMA DUMP END ------------
> [ 86.850000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 076 ] -------------- Show GPMI
> registers ----------
> [ 86.860000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x000 : 0x238010da
> [ 86.870000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x010 : 0x00000000
> [ 86.870000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x020 : 0x000011ff
> [ 86.880000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x030 : 0x000010da
> [ 86.890000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x040 : 0x40f0c480
> [ 86.890000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x050 : 0x40f09000
> [ 86.900000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x060 : 0x0004000c
> [ 86.910000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x070 : 0x00010203
> [ 86.910000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x080 : 0x05000000
> [ 86.920000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x090 : 0x09020101
> [ 86.920000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x0a0 : 0x00000030
> [ 86.930000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x0b0 : 0x80000010
> [ 86.940000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x0c0 : 0x100000ba
> [ 86.940000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x0d0 : 0x03000000
> [ 86.950000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 081 ] -------------- Show GPMI
> registers end ----------
> [ 86.960000] Kernel panic - not syncing: -----------DMA
> FAILED------------------
Please post the functions-calling stack when the panic occurs.
I also want to know where the code is running when the time-out occur.
My gmail is shijie8@gmail.com
We may talk more on the gtalk.
Best Regards
Huang Shijie
> Br,
> Koen
>
>>
>> Please try the new patch.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Huang Shijie
>>> Then it prints some debug info on channel 1 (ssp1) and then alle
>>> channel 2 register except the debug register (ssp2 = not used here).
>>>
>>> What info do you need?
>>>
>>> Br,
>>> Koen
>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> Huang Shijie
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>
>>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b32955@freescale.com (Huang Shijie)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: GPMI-NAND Status?
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:18:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E40ED4B.6030302@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHMSPgPzVordYOn5wgp0OZLGbAqkSGKJxDre8bvRpTyAz85udw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Koen:
thanks for your test.
> Hi,
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Huang Shijie<b32955@freescale.com> wrote:
>> Hi Koen:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Huang Shijie<b32955@freescale.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>> On my target, the mxs-dma is working for sdio until the gpmi-nand
>>>>> gives a timeout. After that the dma for sdio is *not fully* working
>>>>> anymore.
>>>>>
>>>> We need more log in following aspects:
>>>> [1] apbh-dma registers
>>>> [2] clk registers
>>>> [3] gpmi registers
>>>>
>>>> Please git-apply the patch in the attachment.
>>>> It will print out more DMA information WHEN dma-timeout occur.
>>> Don't get it. What exactly are you trying to dump?
>>> This patch dumps CTRL0, CTRL1, CTRL2, DEVSEL but also some registers
>>> of APBH channel0 which is reserved....
>> sorry, I intended to print out the channel 4(NAND_DEVICE0).
>>
>> I want to know that:
>> When the dma timeout occurs, whether it caused by the GPMI or by the DMA
>> itself.
> Ok, I was a little confused about the addresses, but it seems like you
> are using mx28 (and corresponding addresses). APBH dma for mx23 has
> different address according to the datasheet.
> So I adjusted the patch a little for mx23, see attachment.
>
you are right. My address was wrong.
> Here is the log with some comments added on the dma.
>
> # ubiformat /dev/mtd1
> ubiformat: mtd1 (nand), size 20971520 bytes (20.0 MiB), 40 eraseblocks
> of 524288 bytes (512.0 KiB), min. I/O size 4096 bytes
> libscan: scanning eraseblock 0 -- 2 % complete [ 86.720000] [
> start_dma_without_bch_irq : 393 ] DMA timeout, last DMA :1
> [ 86.720000] ------------------------DMA DUMP BEGIN ----------
> [ 86.730000] APBH REG :0 : 30000000 // -> HW_APBH_CTRL0:
> AHB_BURST8_EN, APB_BURST4_EN
> [ 86.730000] APBH REG :10 : 00FF0000 // -> HW_APBH_CTRL1:
> CHX_CMDCMPLT_IRQ_EN, no cmdcmplt_irq
> [ 86.740000] APBH REG :20 : 00000000 // -> HW_APBH_CTRL2: no error_irq
> [ 86.740000] APBH REG :30 : 00000000 // -> HW_APBH_DEVSEL: "N/A
> for apbh bridge dma."
> [ 86.750000] APBH CH4 REG :200 : 418D7098 // executing last dma
> command of command chain (see below)
> [ 86.750000] APBH CH4 REG :210 : 00000000 // no next command, ok
> [ 86.750000] APBH CH4 REG :220 : 000001C8 // HW_APBH_CH4_CMD:
> COMMAND = NO DMA TRANSFER, IRQONCMPLT, WAIT4ENDCMD, SEMAPHORE,
> HALTONTERMINATE
> [ 86.760000] APBH CH4 REG :230 : 00000000 // HW_APBH_CH4_BAR:
> "Address of system memory buffer to be read or written over the AHB
> bus." -> strange value ...
> [ 86.760000] APBH CH4 REG :240 : 00010000 // HW_APBH_CH4_SEMA:
> semaphore counter is 1
> [ 86.770000] APBH CH4 REG :250 : 03A00015 // HW_APBH_CH4_DEBUG1:
> LOCK, NEXTCMDADDRVALID, RD_FIFO_EMPTY, WR_FIFO_EMPTY, STATEMACHINE =
> "WAIT_END = 0x15 When the Wait for Command End bit is set, the state
> machine enters this state until the DMA device indicates that the
> command is complete."
> [ 86.770000] APBH CH4 REG :260 : 00000000 // -> HW_APBH_CH4_DEBUG2:
> no apb of ahb bytes remaining for transfer
> [ 86.780000] [ 0 ] : ME : 418d7000, next : 418d704c, bits :
> 00002304, bytes : 00000000, buf : 00000000
> [ 86.790000] [ 0 ] PIO[0] : 03800000
> [ 86.790000] [ 0 ] PIO[1] : 00000000
> [ 86.800000] [ 0 ] PIO[2] : 00000000
> [ 86.800000] [ 1 ] : ME : 418d704c, next : 418d7098, bits :
> 00006304, bytes : 00000001, buf : 4181b000
> [ 86.810000] [ 1 ] PIO[0] : 018010da
> [ 86.810000] [ 1 ] PIO[1] : 00000000
> [ 86.820000] [ 1 ] PIO[2] : 000011ff
> [ 86.820000] [ 2 ] : ME : 418d7098, next : 00000000, bits :
It hungs here.
> 000023c8, bytes : 00000000, buf : 00000000
> [ 86.830000] [ 2 ] PIO[0] : 038010da
> [ 86.840000] [ 2 ] PIO[1] : 00000000
> [ 86.840000] [ 2 ] PIO[2] : 00000000
> [ 86.840000] ------------------------DMA DUMP END ------------
> [ 86.850000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 076 ] -------------- Show GPMI
> registers ----------
> [ 86.860000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x000 : 0x238010da
> [ 86.870000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x010 : 0x00000000
> [ 86.870000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x020 : 0x000011ff
> [ 86.880000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x030 : 0x000010da
> [ 86.890000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x040 : 0x40f0c480
> [ 86.890000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x050 : 0x40f09000
> [ 86.900000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x060 : 0x0004000c
> [ 86.910000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x070 : 0x00010203
> [ 86.910000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x080 : 0x05000000
> [ 86.920000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x090 : 0x09020101
> [ 86.920000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x0a0 : 0x00000030
> [ 86.930000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x0b0 : 0x80000010
> [ 86.940000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x0c0 : 0x100000ba
> [ 86.940000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 079 ] offset 0x0d0 : 0x03000000
> [ 86.950000] [ gpmi_show_regs : 081 ] -------------- Show GPMI
> registers end ----------
> [ 86.960000] Kernel panic - not syncing: -----------DMA
> FAILED------------------
Please post the functions-calling stack when the panic occurs.
I also want to know where the code is running when the time-out occur.
My gmail is shijie8 at gmail.com
We may talk more on the gtalk.
Best Regards
Huang Shijie
> Br,
> Koen
>
>>
>> Please try the new patch.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Huang Shijie
>>> Then it prints some debug info on channel 1 (ssp1) and then alle
>>> channel 2 register except the debug register (ssp2 = not used here).
>>>
>>> What info do you need?
>>>
>>> Br,
>>> Koen
>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> Huang Shijie
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-09 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-05 13:51 GPMI-NAND Status? Wolfram Sang
2011-08-05 13:51 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-08 6:21 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-08 6:21 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-08 9:19 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-08 9:19 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-08 10:37 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-08 10:37 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-08 12:42 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-08 12:42 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-09 6:36 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 6:36 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 7:58 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-09 7:58 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-09 8:18 ` Huang Shijie [this message]
2011-08-09 8:18 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 8:25 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-09 8:25 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-09 5:11 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 5:11 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 6:25 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-09 6:25 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-09 6:40 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 6:40 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 9:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-09 9:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-09 9:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-09 9:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-09 10:54 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 10:54 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 20:42 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-09 20:42 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-08 9:12 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-08 9:12 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 9:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-09 9:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-09 10:41 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 10:41 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 11:36 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-08-09 11:36 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-08-14 8:11 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-14 8:11 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-14 18:31 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-14 18:31 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-15 5:41 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-08-15 5:41 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-08-15 6:30 ` Lin Tony-B19295
2011-08-15 6:30 ` Lin Tony-B19295
2011-08-15 8:41 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-15 8:41 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-15 8:29 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-15 8:29 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-15 9:31 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-08-15 9:31 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-08-15 12:54 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-15 12:54 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-15 13:37 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-08-15 13:37 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-08-15 16:34 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-15 16:34 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-15 16:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-15 16:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-15 16:22 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-15 16:22 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-15 16:57 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-15 16:57 ` Ivan Djelic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E40ED4B.6030302@freescale.com \
--to=b32955@freescale.com \
--cc=LW@karo-electronics.de \
--cc=koen.beel.barco@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=shijie8@gmail.com \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.