All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" <manjugk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
	<devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 09/14] dt: omap: prepare hwmod to support dt
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:06:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E42C8AD.8000609@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC63_iSX0cjauOj=CcTABqgSWAgYRE_G7Qio5y2BrpeRnkhEWQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On 8/10/2011 8:03 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>  wrote:
>> On 8/10/2011 6:28 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:51:47PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Manju,
>>>>
>>>> On 8/9/2011 4:10 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The omap dt requires new omap hwmod api to be added for in order
>>>>> to support omap dt.
>>>>
>>>> Both the subject and the changelog are misleading. You are not doing
>>>> any hwmod stuff in it.
>>>> You are just passing an "of_node" pointer during omap_device_build_ss.
>>>>
>>>> The subject should start with OMAP: omap_device: because it does not
>>>> belong to the DT subsystem.
>>>> The same comment apply to most patches in that series.
>>>
>>> The goal of this patch is to make omap-hwmod ready for dt adaptation hence
>>> I used the title "dt: omap: prepare hwmod to support dt" and "of_node"
>>> pointer
>>> is passed from dt and it is required for dt build.
>>
>> I think that the goal of this patch is to update the omap_device_build_ss
>> API in order to provide a device tree node pointer to pdev. For the moment
>> there is nothing related to hwmod.
> yes. it is to update  *_ss api with device node pointer and introduce new
> api exported for dt builds.  I can update with this description.
>>
>>> And as you mentioned, patch does not do anything related to omap_device.
>>
>> You meant omap_hwmod?
>
> Yes. It should be "omap: omap_hwmod: add device node pointer"

... "OMAP: omap_device: Add device tree node pointer"

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 09/14] dt: omap: prepare hwmod to support dt
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:06:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E42C8AD.8000609@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC63_iSX0cjauOj=CcTABqgSWAgYRE_G7Qio5y2BrpeRnkhEWQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 8/10/2011 8:03 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson@ti.com>  wrote:
>> On 8/10/2011 6:28 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:51:47PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Manju,
>>>>
>>>> On 8/9/2011 4:10 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The omap dt requires new omap hwmod api to be added for in order
>>>>> to support omap dt.
>>>>
>>>> Both the subject and the changelog are misleading. You are not doing
>>>> any hwmod stuff in it.
>>>> You are just passing an "of_node" pointer during omap_device_build_ss.
>>>>
>>>> The subject should start with OMAP: omap_device: because it does not
>>>> belong to the DT subsystem.
>>>> The same comment apply to most patches in that series.
>>>
>>> The goal of this patch is to make omap-hwmod ready for dt adaptation hence
>>> I used the title "dt: omap: prepare hwmod to support dt" and "of_node"
>>> pointer
>>> is passed from dt and it is required for dt build.
>>
>> I think that the goal of this patch is to update the omap_device_build_ss
>> API in order to provide a device tree node pointer to pdev. For the moment
>> there is nothing related to hwmod.
> yes. it is to update  *_ss api with device node pointer and introduce new
> api exported for dt builds.  I can update with this description.
>>
>>> And as you mentioned, patch does not do anything related to omap_device.
>>
>> You meant omap_hwmod?
>
> Yes. It should be "omap: omap_hwmod: add device node pointer"

... "OMAP: omap_device: Add device tree node pointer"

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-10 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-09 14:10 [RFC/PATCH 00/14] dt: omap hwmod-dt binding and omap3 i2c1 dt support G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 01/14] OMAP: omap_device: replace _find_by_pdev() with to_omap_device() G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 02/14] OMAP: omap_device: replace debug/warning/error prints with dev_* macros G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 03/14] OMAP3: beagle: don't touch omap_device internals G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 04/14] OMAP: McBSP: use existing macros for converting between devices G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10  7:07   ` Jarkko Nikula
2011-08-10  7:07     ` Jarkko Nikula
2011-08-10 10:15     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 10:15       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 16:05       ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10 16:05         ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 05/14] OMAP: omap_device: remove internal functions from omap_device.h G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 06/14] OMAP: omap_device: when building return platform_device instead of omap_device G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 07/14] ARM: platform_device: pdev_archdata: add omap_device pointer G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 08/14] omap2+: Use Kconfig symbol in Makefile instead of obj-y G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 09/14] dt: omap: prepare hwmod to support dt G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10 11:51   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 11:51     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 16:28     ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10 16:28       ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10 17:11       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 17:11         ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 18:03         ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10 18:03           ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
     [not found]           ` <CAC63_iSX0cjauOj=CcTABqgSWAgYRE_G7Qio5y2BrpeRnkhEWQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-10 18:06             ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2011-08-10 18:06               ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-16 15:02       ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-16 15:02         ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 10/14] dt: Add pd_size to AUXDATA structure G, Manjunath Kondaiah
     [not found]   ` <1312897232-4792-11-git-send-email-manjugk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-10 11:57     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 11:57       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 13:16       ` Grant Likely
2011-08-10 13:16         ` Grant Likely
2011-08-10 16:02         ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10 16:02           ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 11/14] dt: omap3: add soc file for handling i2c controllers G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10 12:36   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 12:36     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 16:57     ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10 16:57       ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10 17:45       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 17:45         ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-16  6:32         ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-16  6:32           ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 12/14] dt: omap3: beagle board: set clock freq for i2c devices G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10 12:42   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 12:42     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 16:45     ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10 16:45       ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 13/14] dt: omap3: add generic board file for dt support G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-09 14:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 14/14] dt: omap3: enable dt support for i2c1 controller G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10 12:57   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-10 12:57     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-16 18:44     ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-16 18:44       ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10  5:26 ` [RFC/PATCH 00/14] dt: omap hwmod-dt binding and omap3 i2c1 dt support Rajendra Nayak
2011-08-10  5:26   ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-08-10  5:30   ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10  5:30     ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10  5:39     ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-08-10  5:39       ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-08-10  6:28       ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-08-10  6:28         ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E42C8AD.8000609@ti.com \
    --to=b-cousson-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=manjugk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.