Re: [PATCH 6/6] Input: elantech - add v3 hardware support

[Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>]

On 08/18/2011 01:34 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Wanlong Gao<gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>  wrote:
>> On 08/18/2011 01:26 PM, JJ Ding wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Wanlong Gao,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:01:52 +0800, Wanlong Gao<gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/18/2011 09:57 AM, JJ Ding wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> v3 hardware's packet format is almost identical to v2 (one/three finger
>>>>> touch),
>>>>> except when sensing two finger touch, the hardware sends 12 bytes of
>>>>> data.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: JJ Ding<jj_ding@emc.com.tw>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    Documentation/input/elantech.txt |  104 ++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>    drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c   |  218
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>>    drivers/input/mouse/elantech.h   |   11 ++
>>>>>    3 files changed, 303 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> +static int determine_packet_v3(struct psmouse *psmouse)
>>>>
>>>> elantech_check_parity_v1
>>>> packet_simple_check_v2
>>>> determine_packet_v3
>>>>
>>>> Why not consistent them?
>>>
>>> OK, how do these names sound to you?
>>>
>>> elantech_check_parity_v1
>>> elantech_packet_check_v2
>>> elantech_packet_check_v3
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> jj
>>
>> Yeah, sounds perfectly.
>
> Or just:
>
> elantech_packet_check_v1
> elantech_packet_check_v2
> elantech_packet_check_v3
>
> :)

Hmm... maybe they can go into an elantech_packet_check()?
like:
case 1:
	...
case 2:
	...
What do you think? ;)

Thanks
-Wanlong Gao
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>