From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, TeLeMan <geleman@gmail.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL] slirp: Fix issues with -mms-bitfields
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:19:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E564BE7.3030700@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E564AD6.7040307@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1087 bytes --]
On 2011-08-25 15:15, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 04:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 08/25/2011 08:02 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 08/25/2011 03:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> What a mess. Do we really have to go through all 257 packed data
>>>> structs
>>>> >> in QEMU and add these MS compat bits to all potentially affected
>>>> ones?
>>>> > I prefer to detect -mms-bitfields and remove it in configure.
>>>
>>> Can use -mno-ms-bitfields later to override it.
>>
>> No, we can't do that.
>>
>> The reason glib uses -mms-bitfields is that you need to use it in
>> order to call Windows APIs which is does. We will eventually need to
>> do it anyway.
>
> I meant, just for our own objects. As long as there are no glib APIs
> which use bitfields, it should work.
>
> However, I don't like it either, and prefer the
> __attribute__(((((((gcc_fields)))))) as well.
Could someone with a Windows environment test if that (or (packed,
gcc_fields)?) makes
struct {
unsigned char a;
unsigned int b;
};
truly packed again?
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-25 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-15 6:39 [Qemu-devel] [PULL] slirp: Fix issues with -mms-bitfields Jan Kiszka
2011-08-20 20:00 ` Stefan Weil
2011-08-23 10:49 ` TeLeMan
2011-08-24 9:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 1:14 ` TeLeMan
2011-08-25 11:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 12:02 ` TeLeMan
2011-08-25 12:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 13:02 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 13:07 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-25 13:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 13:17 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 13:15 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 13:19 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-08-25 13:21 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 13:06 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-25 13:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 13:22 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 13:36 ` Peter Maydell
2011-08-25 13:39 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 13:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-25 13:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 14:03 ` Stefan Weil
2011-08-25 14:23 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-25 17:15 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-21 19:49 ` Blue Swirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E564BE7.3030700@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=geleman@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.